Anonymous wrote:You sound very bitter. This thread is for people talking about whether AAP is the right fit their child. Not a thread about the whether the county should have a GT program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:/list]This is why we do not need an entire "center" to challenge the "smart" kids.
Nice to know that the troll is still here. Is this year three for you, troll? Or is it year four?
Anonymous wrote:/list]This is why we do not need an entire "center" to challenge the "smart" kids.
Anonymous wrote:I think each parent knows their child the best and has to decide if this program works for that child. This program is just different and the fast pace won't work for every child and that's ok. We don't need to shove every square peg into a round hole. As for my DC's class, there are lots of parents complaining that the program is moving too fast. For my child the program is still moving too slow. Everyone is different.
As for the prior post I don't think this program should be referred to as a 'gifted' program. It is not. All of these children are not truly gifted. The program is just advanced. And I think that as the years go on and the learning is harder the challenges in the program that a third grader has now may just become bigger.
[/list]This is why we do not need an entire "center" to challenge the "smart" kids. Provide these children what they need at all base schools and stop wasting our tax dollars on special accommodations. If an advanced program was provided in all base schools then children who need advanced learning in everything would be in all advanced classes. Those children who need only some advanced classes could then have the same opportunities afforded to them. This, if done without prejudice, would give all base schools a truly great curriculum, pool of teachers, and a more level playing field for our children. I know this is "I have a Dream" like but come on.
Most of you know the Level IV currently offered at SOME base schools is a joke and level I, II & III are a waste of a child’s time All subjects are mostly taught by one teacher and in many cases parent volunteers!! Hence - why you are fighting so hard for your child to be in the AAP center. It is Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, for these opportunities to be given only to a "select" group. Why can't all of you, and the school system, take a step back and look at giving ALL children the very best education instead of a select few. The county needs to fix this problem and you all need to stop insisting all of your children, a handful who may be off the IQ charts, need a special school.
I am not convinced the blanket assumption that every child who tests into the AAP program in 2ND GRADE should then automatically go into middle and high school advanced classes. Yes, in Fairfax County all children can choose the advanced classes starting in middle school but, if the advanced education is only given to a "select few" in an elementary school "center", then how are the general ed elementary kids going to catch up? Oh and by the way this whole process is called "TRACKING". Same old thing just a different process to get there. Some children will rise above it but Fairfax County will make sure many will not!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd advise kicking back in less rigorous classes while still getting easy As. Then onto a state school on full scholarship and an easy major. Encourage her to spend her down time, which she should have a lot of, pursuing something she likes and sees a need for and to start her own business and build it up. I am 100% serious about this.
This message was brought to you by Bill Gates.
I think this is much more widespread than parents with kids in AAP realize. We are seriously considering pulling our third grader from the program next year and his teacher has told me that we aren't the only parents thinking about that option.
I think that there is a real issue at work here that the county is not acknowledging or addressing. All of our kids take a series of tests that measure critical and creative thinking. All of the tools used to assess their abilities are about what they can achieve, not what they have already learned. And then they are thrown in this hyper-accelerated curriculum that expects them to come in with a set of skills and work habits that I don't think is realistic. Some rise to the occasion, but I think many of them don't.
And for those that don't, there is little to no support. When we got called into the classroom, we were told that the teacher cannot take the time to teach my son to study or to catch him up on his spelling and math (he's "just" at a 3rd grade level so he's behind). So our only choice was to get a tutor and work with him ourselves. If this was a regular classroom, I'd be fine with that. But they tested him, they assessed him and they said he belonged in THIS accelerated program. I actually challenged that way back then and I was assured that I wasn't understanding his potential. And now they are saying he isn't meeting their standards and it's my job to fix it on my own, because they can't take the time. And if that doesn't work, then he should just leave this program, because clearly he is just the wrong fit for the program they said was the right choice for him based on their assessments.
A few years ago they changed the entire program to be an accelerated academic program instead of a gifted and talented program. But they still screen kids using gifted and talented instruments. The time has come to change the screening methods and admit kids who meet the standards of the new model.