Anonymous wrote:I believe in some combination. I think the big bang theory could account for the creation of solid physical matter. But I have a hard time believing that the big bang theory could result in the human soul. (though I do believe it could result in learned and instinctive behavior by animals and humans.) I think that maybe someone - a Creator - started the whole thing off and provided that spark that became the soul. Or that he/she/it could have created the earliest forms of life, which then evolved into later forms.
Anonymous wrote:It is appalling this is a debate. I have zero respect for people who believe in creation - Adam/Eve, ribs, apple, snake and the whole thing. Really?! I don't believe in God but I do think it is possible to believe in God but also believe in something more "plausible" such as God created matter and then things changed on their own - big bang, evolution, etc. But Adam/Eve, etc? No F&*&^% way!
Anonymous wrote:THEY ARE NOT CONFLICTING THEORIES. Big bang & creationism are conflicting. It's ok to 'believe' in both creationism and evolution without having a crisis of faith.
Evolution
Best evidence - the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually vote for seeding by an alien species.
+1
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A combination of both, leaning on the creation side of things. I absolutely believe in God and believe He created the universe but I don't know (or care) about the specifics of how that happened. Really, does it matter?
You're critical thinking is awesome! You must have rocked science in high school & college.
Anonymous wrote:Evolution. I can't believe this is even a debate, on this board or anywhere.