Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the many Indian women I have known, the culture breeds a materialism like I have never seen before. Not surprised she is interested in old men with money. Flame away!
Wow. Just wow. I can't believe someone would say something like this about an entire culture, especially one that forms one of the largest populations in the world. Well, based on a lot of what I read on this forums, I'm just going to generalize and say that I think white people are all rich, ignorant morons.
NP of course one can't say every Indian does X because there are many sub cultures and billions of people. But since there are billions it might seems like there are a lot of materialistic people emerging in India based on a western definition (example: donating to charity is unheard of mainly due still to a belief in the caste system or karma and a distrust of people that ask for money). Plus when people move from abject poverty to riches they tend to go overboard buying things they never could once afford.
Anyway, I wouldn't disagree with the idea outright, but I doubt that's why Padma is a gold digger. Some people just don't see a problem with the exchange (money for beauty).
There you go making HUGE generalizations again. Give it up, you are truly ridiculous. The Indians I know are far more charitable than you can even imagine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the many Indian women I have known, the culture breeds a materialism like I have never seen before. Not surprised she is interested in old men with money. Flame away!
Wow. Just wow. I can't believe someone would say something like this about an entire culture, especially one that forms one of the largest populations in the world. Well, based on a lot of what I read on this forums, I'm just going to generalize and say that I think white people are all rich, ignorant morons.
NP of course one can't say every Indian does X because there are many sub cultures and billions of people. But since there are billions it might seems like there are a lot of materialistic people emerging in India based on a western definition (example: donating to charity is unheard of mainly due still to a belief in the caste system or karma and a distrust of people that ask for money). Plus when people move from abject poverty to riches they tend to go overboard buying things they never could once afford.
Anyway, I wouldn't disagree with the idea outright, but I doubt that's why Padma is a gold digger. Some people just don't see a problem with the exchange (money for beauty).
Anonymous wrote:Based on the many Indian women I have known, the culture breeds a materialism like I have never seen before. Not surprised she is interested in old men with money. Flame away!
Anonymous wrote:She actually has several cookbooks and culinary training - http://www.amazon.com/Tangy-Tart-Hot-Sweet-Recipes/dp/1602860068
http://www.amazon.com/Easy-Exotic-Low-Fat-Recipes-Around/dp/0786886129/ref=pd_sim_b_1
I'm beginning to think that she is in on some conspiracy with Dell to gain the fortune of the dead guy. How is it that Dell is willingly allowing her to keep the child from him? No way has the court not ordered her to allow him visitation. How much to do you want to bet that she is back with Dell within the year?
Anonymous wrote:Only in the DC area would a thread like this become a way for DCUM to become racist against Indian people. God, I cannot wait to move out of this hellhole.
Anonymous wrote:Only in the DC area would a thread like this become a way for DCUM to become racist against Indian people. God, I cannot wait to move out of this hellhole.
Anonymous wrote:Based on the many Indian women I have known, the culture breeds a materialism like I have never seen before. Not surprised she is interested in old men with money. Flame away!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ Just because you find it hard to believe doesn't mean it's not true. And Padma was keeping the child from its father, which is why the issue went to court. They both have plenty of resources, so it's not like one has the upper financial hand. Unless you want to argue that Padma had it, because she had the support of her billionaire boyfriend.
Exactly. Go to court. Or are you saying the judge said it was A-OK that she wasn't giving him access?
Anonymous wrote:^ Just because you find it hard to believe doesn't mean it's not true. And Padma was keeping the child from its father, which is why the issue went to court. They both have plenty of resources, so it's not like one has the upper financial hand. Unless you want to argue that Padma had it, because she had the support of her billionaire boyfriend.