Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[size=18] Still, though, I'm having a hard time not hearing this as RH parents saying they just don't want any more poor children. These children are not to blame for the fact that their parents were laid off or single parenting or whatever. My child goes to a school with a significantly higher FARMS rate than 22% and I have to say -- unless you are making assumptions about ethnicities -- you can't tell who gets FARMS by looking.
It's not that RH parents don't want any more poor children. The issues are first equity of resources for all the children and second preservation of Rosemary Hills Primary School and its surrounding community as a model of successful integration, both in the school and community. This is probably the only neighborhood that isn't homogenous in the whole BCC cluster. It's successful because the mini-cluster brought up the elementary school and encouraged more families from different races to move in, including whites.
We still have most of the poverty here, and that's okay - currently 19% compared to single digit poverty in the three schools we share the mini-cluster with. We chose to live here because we like the racial and socioeconomic diversity. But the Superintendent's rationale for kicking Paddington kids out of Bethesda Elementary so East Bethesda kids can go there says he favors geography over demographics. If that's his philosophy, similar decisions will follow. When does it stop? The NAACP says that the argument for "neighborhood schools" is an argument for re-segregation. I'm sure a lot of people support segregation, but I'm not one of them and I don't think the majority of families in the BCC cluster are.
NP here. Given the fact that Paddington is literally right across the street from RHPS, I do not myself understand why they should have to ride the bus over to BE. Has anybody asked the Paddington residents what they prefer? No, because we'll all sit here and talk about what they should think and do. Paddington is also a pretty small apartment complex. Are there really that many kids preventing your school from continuing "as a model of successful integration?" Sorry, poster, but I have to call BS on your logic. Not to mention the fact that 19% FARMS is way way WAY under the MCPS average for elem schools. The rate at my kids' school is much higher and everybody seems to do just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[size=18] Still, though, I'm having a hard time not hearing this as RH parents saying they just don't want any more poor children. These children are not to blame for the fact that their parents were laid off or single parenting or whatever. My child goes to a school with a significantly higher FARMS rate than 22% and I have to say -- unless you are making assumptions about ethnicities -- you can't tell who gets FARMS by looking.
It's not that RH parents don't want any more poor children. The issues are first equity of resources for all the children and second preservation of Rosemary Hills Primary School and its surrounding community as a model of successful integration, both in the school and community. This is probably the only neighborhood that isn't homogenous in the whole BCC cluster. It's successful because the mini-cluster brought up the elementary school and encouraged more families from different races to move in, including whites.
We still have most of the poverty here, and that's okay - currently 19% compared to single digit poverty in the three schools we share the mini-cluster with. We chose to live here because we like the racial and socioeconomic diversity. But the Superintendent's rationale for kicking Paddington kids out of Bethesda Elementary so East Bethesda kids can go there says he favors geography over demographics. If that's his philosophy, similar decisions will follow. When does it stop? The NAACP says that the argument for "neighborhood schools" is an argument for re-segregation. I'm sure a lot of people support segregation, but I'm not one of them and I don't think the majority of families in the BCC cluster are.
Anonymous wrote:If I understand some of these posts correctly, us on the East, are being accused of not embracing the very same FARMS and ESOL students being kicked out of the West as a result of this? How is it then that we end up with a more homogenous East Bethesda, a good social network as quoted previously and manage to cut the rate of Esol or Farms in half in Bethesda? If that section of the cluster does not have issues with FARMS and ESOL, why are they ending up reducing these rates in the entire West of the cluster?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are prime candidates for white flight, but I don't think a shift from 19 percent to 22 percent is going to be the tipping point.
But is it fair to add 4% poverty to a high minority school, bringing them up to 22%, while you're simultaneously reducing poverty at a wealthy white school from 6% to 3%? The end game is 3% poverty in one school and 22% poverty in another, nearby school. It moves us in the wrong direction, and it could just be the first step. Why wouldn't all Chevy Chase residents wage a similar fight to go to their closest school (CCES or even Somerset) instead of the RHPS/NCC pairing?
We didn't even discuss the poverty shift at NCC, which will double under Option 5.
Anonymous wrote:We are prime candidates for white flight, but I don't think a shift from 19 percent to 22 percent is going to be the tipping point.