Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree with this and think about it a lot. It's like, some parents decide to quit jobs/tone down responsibility to give the kids everything time- and opportunity-wise, but they give up what THEIR parent did for them, right? I often think - ok, I'm 33, and my parents paid for my education, etc. So if I quit work to raise kids (and this is NOT meant to bash SAHM's), and give them everything, will they just do the same thing? And if so, why am I doing it? Hope this makes sense to someone, I know it's a bit convoluted.
I know exactly what you mean...you can go around in circles for hours with this thought process. I eventually broke out - this is my thinking: Unless you're Steve Jobs or Oprah Winfrey (to give a female example, although she has no husband/kids), when you die there aren't groups of strangers assessing your life's accomplishments. Even if they name a conference room or a scholarship after you when you die, what good does that do you? I've decided that life is really just a compilation of days and what's important is you are happy day-to-day, so I chose to do what I think will make me the most happy on a daily basis. Before anyone accuses me of being selfish, one of the things that makes me the most happy is happy kids and spending quality family time. I also like earning an income at a job with reasonable hours and nice people. So that's what I'm doing. I used to earn six figures and have a prestigious career but I wasn't happy.
This is an interesting discussion. I always find it interesting when people use the "when you die, your kids won't care about how much time you spent in the office" or groups of strangers or coworkers won't assess yur life's accomplishments and if they do what good does it do you? I always wonder because you're already gone so whichever path you took, it really doesn't do you any good anyway. Kwim?
We women really have touch decisions to make - it's not easy.
Anonymous wrote:In all of this discussion, what I find strange are the SAHMs who are ignoring the very obvious fact that BECAUSE they choose to SAHM, their husbands - the fathers of their children - very likely feel much more pressure to succeed and likely spend much less time with their kids.
So why is this so admirable? My mother SAH with me and my siblings. And that was fine. But it meant I never saw my father. Perhaps I would have preferred her to work at least part time so some of the pressure was off my dad...
Anonymous wrote:PP here and I do the EXACT same thing.
I do admit that I find it kind of ironic when SAHM's push for their daughters to be in the BEST activities, go to the BEST schools, etc. What do you want for them that you didn't want for yourself? I know we all have choices to make, but it seems like it's worth discussion.
Anonymous wrote:
So, is this a thinly veiled post for Steve Jobs -bashers? I know plenty of idiots who can't pay attention and raise their kids on a good day. What about them, OP?
Really, Jobs contributed to our society in a way the bashers NEVER will. Just because he didn't find the cure for cancer doesn't mean he did not have a tremendous contribution to our society. You don't have to be a fanboy/girl to know he was a true innovator.
He was press savvy and chose his words wisely, as any good business owner does. So what? Let it go people, and worry about your own inept parenting. Stop picking on people who are so obviously out of your league, Steve Jobs or not.
Anonymous wrote:Steve Jobs knew he was dying but only quit work 6 weeks ago. If I was his kid, I'd be pretty resentful about that.
I would be thinking, my dad cared far more about his job than he did with me and he gave his life to the company and old quit when he couldn't physically do it anymore, instead of maybe quitting 6 months ago and spending more quality time with me before he died.
But, I'm a pessimist.
You should probably ask the daughter (Lisa Ann Brennan Jobs) whose paternity he tried to deny whether or not she would have liked more time with him. The guy came by his issues honestly but it seems he was pretty much of a disaster in his personal life.Anonymous wrote:Every time a conversation regarding SAHM vs. WOHM, the behavior we model for our children, etc comes up, there seems to be an unspoken but agreed upon assumption that the big decisions we make as parents will impact who our children will be as adults. In some respects that is a give: of course who we our as parents will influence our children's lives. But we never discuss the crucial component of FREE WILL. The biggest determinant of our children's future is our children themselves. They will be the ones to decide whether they want to go to college, grad school, what kind of career to pursue, whether to SAH, etc...And most of those decisions will be made based on their fundamental personalities--something we don't have any control over.
I guess my point is that a Steve or Stephanie Jobs is not made--they're born--and unless you're a parent guilty of abuse/neglect, there's not much you can do to prevent any child from becoming who their personality destines them to be.