Anonymous wrote:Types the anonymous internet poster. There were ways to light rooms before the lightbulb, as well. Candles work fine - Edison wasn't such a big deal.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
People who are as brilliant as he was are a gift to the world. I think it was a selfless act for him to spend his short time on this earth moving mankind forward. He has been compared to people like Thomas Edison -- people whose minds and actions will contribute to society for years to come. How could anyone possibly "regret" that? What, that he missed a few kids baseball games?
I have a hard time comparing Jobs to Edison. Quite a difference between inventing electric light and technology products. Yes, technology has affect society in many great ways, but is it necessary? No. There were other ways to communicate before the internet and computers and cell phones and tablets. People also had more in-person relationships and did more than stare a rectangular screens of various sizes all day.
My point is that it has bothered me for some time how much new coverage the iPod/iPhone has gotten over the past 10 years. Since when does a technology product make national news? It's so odd to me. There are so many more important things to humanity than technology. So much more. And this is from someone who works in IT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did he give most of his money away to charitable causes? That would be good especially when you think how much the few very rich people have and how little the masses of poor people have.
We'll probably see something after his estate is settled. There is no need to leave $6 billion to family.
Says you. And who are you to decide what someone else's "needs" are?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did he give most of his money away to charitable causes? That would be good especially when you think how much the few very rich people have and how little the masses of poor people have.
We'll probably see something after his estate is settled. There is no need to leave $6 billion to family.
Anonymous wrote:Considering that he was an adoptee who was abandoned by his own parents who later married each other and had another child--I'd say he came by some serious rejection and abandonment issues pretty honestly. But sure he wasn't a saint. But overall his impact on the world was positive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
People who are as brilliant as he was are a gift to the world. I think it was a selfless act for him to spend his short time on this earth moving mankind forward. He has been compared to people like Thomas Edison -- people whose minds and actions will contribute to society for years to come. How could anyone possibly "regret" that? What, that he missed a few kids baseball games?
I have a hard time comparing Jobs to Edison. Quite a difference between inventing electric light and technology products. Yes, technology has affect society in many great ways, but is it necessary? No. There were other ways to communicate before the internet and computers and cell phones and tablets. People also had more in-person relationships and did more than stare a rectangular screens of various sizes all day.
My point is that it has bothered me for some time how much new coverage the iPod/iPhone has gotten over the past 10 years. Since when does a technology product make national news? It's so odd to me. There are so many more important things to humanity than technology. So much more. And this is from someone who works in IT.
Electricity is not necessary for survival.
Anonymous wrote:Did he give most of his money away to charitable causes? That would be good especially when you think how much the few very rich people have and how little the masses of poor people have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His poor family. at 56 he still would have had years of innovations ahead of him, that we will never see. Truly, it is the world's loss.
I somehow doubt his family is even remoely poor. Please! His family is grieving but they are not now, nor will they ever be, poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is so, so horrible. Why couldn't it have been Zuckerberg or Page/Brin? Facebook and Google have ruined everything. Job used his powers for good.
Let's not make him a saint, just yet. He denied paternity of his illegitimate child for a very long time. This isn't using your power for good.
Considering that he was an adoptee who was abandoned by his own parents who later married each other and had another child--I'd say he came by some serious rejection and abandonment issues pretty honestly. But sure he wasn't a saint. But overall his impact on the world was positive.
Then his own background should have made him more sensitive to this child. He swore in court that he was sterile. He was a genius with what he did but he was as much a flawed human being as the rest of us and he doesn't appear to have been much of an humanitarian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is so, so horrible. Why couldn't it have been Zuckerberg or Page/Brin? Facebook and Google have ruined everything. Job used his powers for good.
Let's not make him a saint, just yet. He denied paternity of his illegitimate child for a very long time. This isn't using your power for good.
Considering that he was an adoptee who was abandoned by his own parents who later married each other and had another child--I'd say he came by some serious rejection and abandonment issues pretty honestly. But sure he wasn't a saint. But overall his impact on the world was positive.
Anonymous wrote:His poor family. at 56 he still would have had years of innovations ahead of him, that we will never see. Truly, it is the world's loss.