Anonymous wrote:i imagine the charter schools make it really hard for DCPS to plan. a charter can pop up at any time and move or close at any time. this has to wreak havoc for the planning process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is any of this new news? DCPS has been working on consolidating facilities and closing underused schools since at least Janey's tenure.
Because it's a big deal to the people who live in neighborhoods near closed schools. Neighbors are upset at losing their school (which they may have attended or where they may regularly volunteer). Receiving schools must be chosen for displaced kids. And a plan needs to be formulated for the now-vacant buildings.
If you're in-boundary for a school that's significantly over-enrolled, the process probably won't affect you. For everyone else, it's a huge deal.
Anonymous wrote:And as pp above
4. If Banneker is a diamond in the wrong setting, it seems your solution is to smash the 'diamond' to smithereens...
Anonymous wrote:17:29, you way the options but the love affair of Banneker and Howard is platonic. Merely, because if it was so viable then Howard would have not invested into their own charter-school.
Again, if all schools are about academics then why can't the two shall mix; if they serve an application only population? You can't even compare the SWW/GW relationship with a Howard/Banneker relationship talking about apples and oranges. A history lesson will show what Banneker started out to be and what it has ended up to be are at two different spectrums. Plainly put it is a diamond in the wrong setting.
Just imagine if the 100 incoming freshmen that were destined for Banneker returned to their neighborhood schools, it would start a renaissance movement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is the article on the Mayor's hiring of a consulting firm on capacity issues
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-commissions-a-schools-analysis/2011/08/17/gIQAwqJdOJ_story.html?wprss=rss_local
Bill Turque basically says not when but how much
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-schools-insider/post/school-closings-not-a-question-of-if-but-how-big/2011/09/29/gIQAzC7N7K_blog.html
Thanks for the link. Turque's article make me hopeful that our Charter, which is in a temporary space, may actually be able to secure a great new home.
Anonymous wrote:17:29, you way the options but the love affair of Banneker and Howard is platonic. Merely, because if it was so viable then Howard would have not invested into their own charter-school.
Again, if all schools are about academics then why can't the two shall mix; if they serve an application only population? You can't even compare the SWW/GW relationship with a Howard/Banneker relationship talking about apples and oranges. A history lesson will show what Banneker started out to be and what it has ended up to be are at two different spectrums. Plainly put it is a diamond in the wrong setting.
Just imagine if the 100 incoming freshmen that were destined for Banneker returned to their neighborhood schools, it would start a renaissance movement.
Anonymous wrote:Here is the article on the Mayor's hiring of a consulting firm on capacity issues
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dc-commissions-a-schools-analysis/2011/08/17/gIQAwqJdOJ_story.html?wprss=rss_local
Bill Turque basically says not when but how much
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-schools-insider/post/school-closings-not-a-question-of-if-but-how-big/2011/09/29/gIQAzC7N7K_blog.html
Anonymous wrote:Mom and pop charter schools are on this list too. They are not exempt from a round of closing. I am just flabber-gasted that OSSE has chosen this outside group to come in and have the last say-so.
We have created 13 k thru 8 schools and I guess we are about to close them or return them to traditional middle schools. Yet, the most recent survey reveals [hypothetically] that our middle schools should all be located on the campus of St. Elizabeth.
As for the high-schools let's see whose on the chopping block e.g., Elllington, Roosevelt, Spingarn, Coolidge and Banneker. These schools are not on the get rid off but a retooling or relocation of the student populaton is on the horizon. Case in point Banneker students could definitely be merged into McKinley. Banneker property alone is worth about zillion dollars for Howard University.