Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Strong language instruction emanates from two-way/dual immersion, not one-way immersion. The DCPSCB doesn't support dual immersion, claiming that federal charter law doesn't permit the practice (untrue, a number of states have passed charter laws supporting dual immersion charter programs without federal interference). They up beat on LAMB's admins on a regular basis for trying to offer dual immersion by courting Spanish speaking families. Until this changes, DCI can't offer serious language studies. Oyster can, DCI can't. [/quote
I wouldn't hold Oyster as an example for anything positive. That school is a mess.
We only lotteried for Oyster. Is it any worse than MV and DCI?
I'm an IB Oyster parent, and the school is wonderful! We are happy with the education our children are receiving, and they both LOVE the school. It's not perfect, but no place is faultless. That said, I really wish people would leave Oyster out of discussions concerning other immersion schools--especially when trying to bash said schools. Inevitably, Oyster's good name gets dragged into a fight that is not its own.
Come on. PP simply noted that Oyster offers dual immersion (best practices per immersion studies) while DCI doesn't because of the way the DC charter law is written and DCPSCB practices.
I would not send my kid to Oyster. If you say anymore, you will be shouted down by Oyster parents. I would visit the school and see for yourself. Try to go during a time other than an open house. It's eye opening. I would strongly advise pretty much any other school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Strong language instruction emanates from two-way/dual immersion, not one-way immersion. The DCPSCB doesn't support dual immersion, claiming that federal charter law doesn't permit the practice (untrue, a number of states have passed charter laws supporting dual immersion charter programs without federal interference). They up beat on LAMB's admins on a regular basis for trying to offer dual immersion by courting Spanish speaking families. Until this changes, DCI can't offer serious language studies. Oyster can, DCI can't. [/quote
I wouldn't hold Oyster as an example for anything positive. That school is a mess.
We only lotteried for Oyster. Is it any worse than MV and DCI?
I'm an IB Oyster parent, and the school is wonderful! We are happy with the education our children are receiving, and they both LOVE the school. It's not perfect, but no place is faultless. That said, I really wish people would leave Oyster out of discussions concerning other immersion schools--especially when trying to bash said schools. Inevitably, Oyster's good name gets dragged into a fight that is not its own.
Come on. PP simply noted that Oyster offers dual immersion (best practices per immersion studies) while DCI doesn't because of the way the DC charter law is written and DCPSCB practices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Strong language instruction emanates from two-way/dual immersion, not one-way immersion. The DCPSCB doesn't support dual immersion, claiming that federal charter law doesn't permit the practice (untrue, a number of states have passed charter laws supporting dual immersion charter programs without federal interference). They up beat on LAMB's admins on a regular basis for trying to offer dual immersion by courting Spanish speaking families. Until this changes, DCI can't offer serious language studies. Oyster can, DCI can't. [/quote
I wouldn't hold Oyster as an example for anything positive. That school is a mess.
We only lotteried for Oyster. Is it any worse than MV and DCI?
I'm an IB Oyster parent, and the school is wonderful! We are happy with the education our children are receiving, and they both LOVE the school. It's not perfect, but no place is faultless. That said, I really wish people would leave Oyster out of discussions concerning other immersion schools--especially when trying to bash said schools. Inevitably, Oyster's good name gets dragged into a fight that is not its own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Strong language instruction emanates from two-way/dual immersion, not one-way immersion. The DCPSCB doesn't support dual immersion, claiming that federal charter law doesn't permit the practice (untrue, a number of states have passed charter laws supporting dual immersion charter programs without federal interference). They up beat on LAMB's admins on a regular basis for trying to offer dual immersion by courting Spanish speaking families. Until this changes, DCI can't offer serious language studies. Oyster can, DCI can't. [/quote
I wouldn't hold Oyster as an example for anything positive. That school is a mess.
We only lotteried for Oyster. Is it any worse than MV and DCI?
Anonymous wrote:Strong language instruction emanates from two-way/dual immersion, not one-way immersion. The DCPSCB doesn't support dual immersion, claiming that federal charter law doesn't permit the practice (untrue, a number of states have passed charter laws supporting dual immersion charter programs without federal interference). They up beat on LAMB's admins on a regular basis for trying to offer dual immersion by courting Spanish speaking families. Until this changes, DCI can't offer serious language studies. Oyster can, DCI can't. [/quote
I wouldn't hold Oyster as an example for anything positive. That school is a mess.
Anonymous wrote:We can all pretend that DCI is a strong school offering serious language instruction. But it isn't so. It's just OK. Not sure why one thread after another explores the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're a Chinese speaker in a good position to judge? If yes, here's a suggestion: please go speak to the Chinese teachers at DCI (in Chinese, and in private). Ask them how many students there are in the DCI student body who speak Chinese at home in a dialect-speaking family. You'll get your answer in under a minute. Zilch. Zip. Nada. What a joke.
Since I know 2 families at DCI who fit that exact description and I don't even have kids enrolled there, I call BS on your post right away. And check this out: you don't have to actually speak Chinese yourself to have friends who are both native Chinese speakers and who have kids. Imagine that!
Anonymous wrote:You're a Chinese speaker in a good position to judge? If yes, here's a suggestion: please go speak to the Chinese teachers at DCI (in Chinese, and in private). Ask them how many students there are in the DCI student body who speak Chinese at home in a dialect-speaking family. You'll get your answer in under a minute. Zilch. Zip. Nada. What a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Come on, posters don't hate YY. But there's an element of the ridiculous about their brand of immersion that gets pointed out. To sum it up:
School leadership (admins and parents) doesn't speak Chinese, year after year.
Chinese works to keep out the poors, but doesn't work to attract Chinese-speaking students.
Every kid gets good grades for speaking, but few speak well unless parents pay to supplement extensively. Nobody minds.
The next step, DCI, attracts no Chinese-speaking students.