Anonymous wrote:I've heard it said that it might be easier to get in from a school where fewer students are applying to top schools. Is that true?

Anonymous wrote:Wow, so the major criteria on which high schools should be judged (prepping kids for strong college acceptance) shows that basically all MCPS high schools are VERY similar. I'm not totally surprised, but I suspects much angst will be had in certain parts of Bethesda and Potomac.

Anonymous wrote:Here's the link to the corrected data: http://bethesdamagazine.com/College_Chart.pdf

It looks like Blair did better than the Ws for many colleges. Go figure!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The magazine doesn't list matriculation rates, just acceptances (as reported by the schools.) I don't know much about Blair, but I always thought the discrepancy was simply related to the small relative size of the magnets there as compared to the regular student body. I assume (maybe wrongly) that Blair magnet kids do very well in competitive college admission but that the overall student body does less well than other area schools (also maybe a wrong asumption, although the Bethesda mag stats seem to bear it out.)

Also consider that the Bethesda mag stats besides being subject to the vagaries of self reporting, also only include the. Ounty's most competititive HD - the Ws and BCC.

Just an FYI as posted to our school listserve today. Apparently the Sept/October lists are wrong:

Dear MCPS high school principals and counselors:

We at Bethesda Magazine were deeply chagrined to learn today that the headings for our annual college chart were inadvertently switched in our September/October issue. Because of that, the information provided by your schools was listed under the wrong high school. We know how popular this chart is with our readers, and how much effort you all put into providing us with the information. So please accept our deepest apologies.

We'll be putting the corrected chart on our website and rerunning the corrected chart in our November/December print issue.
Again, please accept our apologies.
Best,

Lisa Shroder
Editor
Bethesda Magazine

Anonymous wrote:The magazine doesn't list matriculation rates, just acceptances (as reported by the schools.) I don't know much about Blair, but I always thought the discrepancy was simply related to the small relative size of the magnets there as compared to the regular student body. I assume (maybe wrongly) that Blair magnet kids do very well in competitive college admission but that the overall student body does less well than other area schools (also maybe a wrong asumption, although the Bethesda mag stats seem to bear it out.)

Also consider that the Bethesda mag stats besides being subject to the vagaries of self reporting, also only include the. Ounty's most competititive HD - the Ws and BCC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would imagine there are mroe families at the W schools are are wrapped up in these stats enough to make sure their kids' information gets reported. I can see lots of folks at Blair not bothering to report, because they are not so hung up on these competitive comparisons.

I'm a Whitman parent and I can assure you that this is not the case. I assume this data comes out of Naviance, which is run by the college counseling office. Parents have no role in updating it, reporting it or whatever. The schools know where the applications are going because they send all the transcripts and recommendations.

Do the schools also get notified about which schools end up accepting the students?