Anonymous wrote:Woah, you're pretty much validating this poster's concerns linking the highly gifted centers and social challenges, despite evidence to the contrary (that is, the other posters). Not sure who you are or what you are trying to accomplish, but you're not making yourself look good
What nonsense are you spinning? How did you reach this conclusion?
By the way, while your pea-size brain spins in its thimble, I am not a member of the GT center. My grown children were not part of the GT center therefore there is no conflict of interest or selection bias on my part.
Woah, you're pretty much validating this poster's concerns linking the highly gifted centers and social challenges, despite evidence to the contrary (that is, the other posters). Not sure who you are or what you are trying to accomplish, but you're not making yourself look good
What nonsense are you spinning? How did you reach this conclusion?
Woah, you're pretty much validating this poster's concerns linking the highly gifted centers and social challenges, despite evidence to the contrary (that is, the other posters). Not sure who you are or what you are trying to accomplish, but you're not making yourself look good
Anonymous wrote:Look, it's a legitimate question whether you like it or not. My DC happened to test off the chart on the 2nd grade test and the principal has already approached us about the fact that the school (previous teachers, administrators) have identified DC as an extraordinarily smart student. So, clearly, we will look at the HGC. That said, I have heard feedback that sometimes smart kids who are very socially challenged/odd go to these programs. I happen to have a very socially mature, engaging, smart child. Considering that I believe the social environment is as important as the academics, I will ask the question. Sorry for you that you seem to think that smart equals socially awkward and that socially confident equals dimwitted. You have a very black and white view of things. That belief system usually doesn't work out well.
Typical dcummie lies from an envious mourning mother. Since your child did not get into the program there is no need to disparage those who made the cut and choose to matriculate.
Take your tall tales elsewhere. Your rationalizations are illegitimate.
Look, it's a legitimate question whether you like it or not. My DC happened to test off the chart on the 2nd grade test and the principal has already approached us about the fact that the school (previous teachers, administrators) have identified DC as an extraordinarily smart student. So, clearly, we will look at the HGC. That said, I have heard feedback that sometimes smart kids who are very socially challenged/odd go to these programs. I happen to have a very socially mature, engaging, smart child. Considering that I believe the social environment is as important as the academics, I will ask the question. Sorry for you that you seem to think that smart equals socially awkward and that socially confident equals dimwitted. You have a very black and white view of things. That belief system usually doesn't work out well.
Anonymous wrote:Would you say that most of the kids in the program are just very smart children -- as opposed to the "hall wanderers, "10 minute pencil sharpeners," etc. that have been discussed above. I like the idea of more challenging work for my DC, but I am reluctant to put him in a situation with for lack of a better term "rainman" types (like the kid who is 3 years ahead in math at our school, but mumbles to himself all day and looks shell-shocked all the time). Also, how much is "tons" of homework? It seems that if the program is enriching, studies would suggest homework is much less necessary. Thank you for your input.
Spewed by a jealous and degenerating average mind who has spawned children who are "dimwitted" thinkers and who fail to even meet the low test bar for the GT centers. What do you expect from an envious parent with children that don't make the cut? What will she say when her dull children don't even make the cut for the sports' travel team?
Stay posted.
Would you say that most of the kids in the program are just very smart children -- as opposed to the "hall wanderers, "10 minute pencil sharpeners," etc. that have been discussed above. I like the idea of more challenging work for my DC, but I am reluctant to put him in a situation with for lack of a better term "rainman" types (like the kid who is 3 years ahead in math at our school, but mumbles to himself all day and looks shell-shocked all the time). Also, how much is "tons" of homework? It seems that if the program is enriching, studies would suggest homework is much less necessary. Thank you for your input.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child just started in the program (4th grade). I really think it's mainly the test results that are considered...because the results really show whether the child is of the HGC caliber or not. I'm sure the teacher recommendations help some (it's the 3rd grade teachers, by the time they need to fill out the forms they've already had your child in class for at least 4 months). I wouldn't say you'd have to worry too much about the parent application, I think all we wrote was that our child wasn't challenged by the assignments he was getting at the old school.
That being said, the new school is way different from his old one....tons of homework and projects, all very challenging, but also take a lot of time to complete.
Would you say that most of the kids in the program are just very smart children -- as opposed to the "hall wanderers, "10 minute pencil sharpeners," etc. that have been discussed above. I like the idea of more challenging work for my DC, but I am reluctant to put him in a situation with for lack of a better term "rainman" types (like the kid who is 3 years ahead in math at our school, but mumbles to himself all day and looks shell-shocked all the time). Also, how much is "tons" of homework? It seems that if the program is enriching, studies would suggest homework is much less necessary. Thank you for your input.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child just started in the program (4th grade). I really think it's mainly the test results that are considered...because the results really show whether the child is of the HGC caliber or not. I'm sure the teacher recommendations help some (it's the 3rd grade teachers, by the time they need to fill out the forms they've already had your child in class for at least 4 months). I wouldn't say you'd have to worry too much about the parent application, I think all we wrote was that our child wasn't challenged by the assignments he was getting at the old school.
That being said, the new school is way different from his old one....tons of homework and projects, all very challenging, but also take a lot of time to complete.
Would you say that most of the kids in the program are just very smart children -- as opposed to the "hall wanderers, "10 minute pencil sharpeners," etc. that have been discussed above. I like the idea of more challenging work for my DC, but I am reluctant to put him in a situation with for lack of a better term "rainman" types (like the kid who is 3 years ahead in math at our school, but mumbles to himself all day and looks shell-shocked all the time). Also, how much is "tons" of homework? It seems that if the program is enriching, studies would suggest homework is much less necessary. Thank you for your input.