Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is so much wasted time in public schools. There really isn't much true "instructional time" in the course of a school day (kids are ES aged, can't speak for MS or HS).
FCPS tries to be everything to everybody and that just doesn't work. It doesnt.
I have no idea what that last comment even means. It just doesn't make sense. It doesn't.
Anonymous wrote:There is so much wasted time in public schools. There really isn't much true "instructional time" in the course of a school day (kids are ES aged, can't speak for MS or HS).
FCPS tries to be everything to everybody and that just doesn't work. It doesnt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As one of many dedicated and hard-working teachers who is not a public employee and not in a union...I am crushed by the PP's response. You are clearly misinformed and making rash judgements. But now your kid is lucky enough to stay home with you everyday and get brainwashed by your negativity, rather than experiencing the influence of other positive teachers in his life.
+1 another teacher here - couldn't have said it better myself
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As one of many dedicated and hard-working teachers who is not a public employee and not in a union...I am crushed by the PP's response. You are clearly misinformed and making rash judgements. But now your kid is lucky enough to stay home with you everyday and get brainwashed by your negativity, rather than experiencing the influence of other positive teachers in his life.
+1 another teacher here - couldn't have said it better myself
Anonymous wrote:As one of many dedicated and hard-working teachers who is not a public employee and not in a union...I am crushed by the PP's response. You are clearly misinformed and making rash judgements. But now your kid is lucky enough to stay home with you everyday and get brainwashed by your negativity, rather than experiencing the influence of other positive teachers in his life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree there are good reasons to home school and you listed many of them. We moved a lot when I was younger, so my mother would often home school me for the last few months of the year, and it was a wonderful experience. On the other hand, I really don't understand why someone would home school for religious reasons if they are not trying to keep their kids away from the evil world. Can you explain that a little more?
Sure. Here is one specific example that was part of a broader scope of reasons that helped one family I know decide to homeschool.
This particular religious family believes in the scientific theory of evolution, but wanted to be able to explain it to their young child in a way that was compatible to their faith and the Biblical teaching of Creation. In home school science, they talked about how the big bang theory compliments the "Let there be light" passage in the Bible. Out of nothing, came something, so profound and explosive. This compatibility of faith and science could never, in this country, be addressed in a public school setting. As homeschoolers, they could do that. They could study different archeological discoveries like the discovery of ancient twin cities that appear to have been catastrophically destroyed by fire around similar times (I forgot the name but remember seeing the documentary on the History Channel) and compare the discovery to the Biblical tale of Soddom and Gommorah. They were able to research the religious origins of many of our Christmas carols and Rennaisance artwork. They were able to talk about other religions in addition to Christianity, and how faith plays a roll in history. None of these things, important to this religious family, were possible in the public school setting. Homeschooling enabled them to lay a spiritual foundation for their child that a public school would not.
Ok, I get your examples, but couldn't this be supplemental learning outside of school? Maybe there's more than what I can tell, but it seems like this family's religious perspective could compliment public schools, and does not necessarily conflict.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most "teachers" are pathetic overpaid public employees. They whine about the children's behavior. They while about the parents. They whine about all the extra hours for prep time. They want to be revered as the most important professions in our society, but they hide behind their union to secure benefits for even the worst of their kind.
Our kids are our responsibility to raise into educated adults with the right values, and there is no indication that the teachers we've dealt with are up to that challenge.
Besides, what's the downside? Am I going to teach finger-painting wrong?
The kids get lots of socialization through church and sports, etc. but instead of sitting in a room with 30 kids the same age and marching to the sound of a bell every hour, they get to learn in a much more exciting and fulfilling way, taking lots of trips and having lots of spontaneous interactions with people from all walks of life.
Wow. Spoken like someone who has never set foot inside a classroom. I have a teaching degree from a highly regarded program from a highly regarded school. I spent four years teaching at an inner city public high school and let me tell you, the teachers are not the problem. Problems I ran into:
35 kids per class
Absent/uninvolved parents, which led to truancy, gang affiliation and crime.
Being forced to teach to a standardized test rather than teaching interesting and engaging material in an interesting and engaging way.
Being paid for a 30 hour work week but actually working 50-60 hours
Shabby/broken classroom furniture and equipment
$25/student to spend on supplies and only if the student pays the lab fee. I taught at a school where 83% of the student body were FARMs so yeah, good luck getting that money!
You clearly don't know what you're talking about so STFU.
Also, teachers don't get paid for their summer breaks. Our 9 month salaries get split up into 12 month payments.
You sound like the problem. 35 kids is fine if you are an effective teacher who doesn't just sit at the desk but moves around and engages with the class pretty much all the time. Also you can take a dry curriculum and add to it, but that depends on your own creativity and brain power. But maybe you lack that as well as the effectiveness. I expect so.
I'm a guy and I must add that the only time I hear talk like this is between women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most "teachers" are pathetic overpaid public employees. They whine about the children's behavior. They while about the parents. They whine about all the extra hours for prep time. They want to be revered as the most important professions in our society, but they hide behind their union to secure benefits for even the worst of their kind.
Our kids are our responsibility to raise into educated adults with the right values, and there is no indication that the teachers we've dealt with are up to that challenge.
Besides, what's the downside? Am I going to teach finger-painting wrong?
The kids get lots of socialization through church and sports, etc. but instead of sitting in a room with 30 kids the same age and marching to the sound of a bell every hour, they get to learn in a much more exciting and fulfilling way, taking lots of trips and having lots of spontaneous interactions with people from all walks of life.
Wow. Spoken like someone who has never set foot inside a classroom. I have a teaching degree from a highly regarded program from a highly regarded school. I spent four years teaching at an inner city public high school and let me tell you, the teachers are not the problem. Problems I ran into:
35 kids per class
Absent/uninvolved parents, which led to truancy, gang affiliation and crime.
Being forced to teach to a standardized test rather than teaching interesting and engaging material in an interesting and engaging way.
Being paid for a 30 hour work week but actually working 50-60 hours
Shabby/broken classroom furniture and equipment
$25/student to spend on supplies and only if the student pays the lab fee. I taught at a school where 83% of the student body were FARMs so yeah, good luck getting that money!
You clearly don't know what you're talking about so STFU.
Also, teachers don't get paid for their summer breaks. Our 9 month salaries get split up into 12 month payments.
You sound like the problem. 35 kids is fine if you are an effective teacher who doesn't just sit at the desk but moves around and engages with the class pretty much all the time. Also you can take a dry curriculum and add to it, but that depends on your own creativity and brain power. But maybe you lack that as well as the effectiveness. I expect so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most "teachers" are pathetic overpaid public employees. They whine about the children's behavior. They while about the parents. They whine about all the extra hours for prep time. They want to be revered as the most important professions in our society, but they hide behind their union to secure benefits for even the worst of their kind.
Our kids are our responsibility to raise into educated adults with the right values, and there is no indication that the teachers we've dealt with are up to that challenge.
Besides, what's the downside? Am I going to teach finger-painting wrong?
The kids get lots of socialization through church and sports, etc. but instead of sitting in a room with 30 kids the same age and marching to the sound of a bell every hour, they get to learn in a much more exciting and fulfilling way, taking lots of trips and having lots of spontaneous interactions with people from all walks of life.
Wow. Spoken like someone who has never set foot inside a classroom. I have a teaching degree from a highly regarded program from a highly regarded school. I spent four years teaching at an inner city public high school and let me tell you, the teachers are not the problem. Problems I ran into:
35 kids per class
Absent/uninvolved parents, which led to truancy, gang affiliation and crime.
Being forced to teach to a standardized test rather than teaching interesting and engaging material in an interesting and engaging way.
Being paid for a 30 hour work week but actually working 50-60 hours
Shabby/broken classroom furniture and equipment
$25/student to spend on supplies and only if the student pays the lab fee. I taught at a school where 83% of the student body were FARMs so yeah, good luck getting that money!
You clearly don't know what you're talking about so STFU.
Also, teachers don't get paid for their summer breaks. Our 9 month salaries get split up into 12 month payments.
You sound like the problem. 35 kids is fine if you are an effective teacher who doesn't just sit at the desk but moves around and engages with the class pretty much all the time. Also you can take a dry curriculum and add to it, but that depends on your own creativity and brain power. But maybe you lack that as well as the effectiveness. I expect so.