Anonymous wrote: I'd love to know why (budget, most likely).
Anonymous wrote:Yes, yes. It's very important not to discuss changes in how the schools operate. That's the best way to improve the schools and prevent bad ideas from being replicated in other classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is in third grade at Lafayette. This year, two of the other third grade classes have merged and are being "co-taught" by two teachers. They removed the partitions between the classrooms and each teacher is taking turns teaching 50 kids at a time. Needless to say, some parents are freaking out. The school and the two very highly thought of teachers insist it will be great. Anyone ever heard of thus type of thing before? Maybe if it has worked well at another school these parents will be reassured. I am glad my child s in a different class.
Why post this on DCUM?
1) The information is not completely accurate
2) You haven't talked to the teachers or the principal about it
3) Your kid is not in the class
Anonymous wrote:When one teacher is with the 50 kids, what will the other teacher be doing? Working with small groups/individuals or doing prep work? The former strikes me as a justifiable approach, the latter not at all.
We need more info before the collective wisdom of this forum can render a verdict
Anonymous wrote:My child is in this class and I am not freaking out. First, whoever said "lazy ass teachers" has no idea what they're talking about. The two teachers involved here are two of the absolute best teachers in the entire school. I am withholding judgment on how it will be until after BTS night (which I am looking forward to for entertainment value if nothing else). While it seems like a lot of kids in one large room, they still will do things separately. Also, one of the teachers is pregnant and will take leave in December, I think this gives the kids a sense of continuity that they would not have had when the teacher leaves for 2 months. I don't always love everything at Lafayette, but I am hopeful that these teachers (both very experienced) would not have wanted to do this if they did not absolutely believe it was a good thing. As for class size, I definitely think teachers make the difference as does the composition of the class.
Anonymous wrote:My DC is in third grade at Lafayette. This year, two of the other third grade classes have merged and are being "co-taught" by two teachers. They removed the partitions between the classrooms and each teacher is taking turns teaching 50 kids at a time. Needless to say, some parents are freaking out. The school and the two very highly thought of teachers insist it will be great. Anyone ever heard of thus type of thing before? Maybe if it has worked well at another school these parents will be reassured. I am glad my child s in a different class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are getting this information 2nd hand so I don't beleive that the OPs information is totally correct and I don't really understand OPs reasoning for coming to this board.
It is still two full-time teachers, teaching 50 kids. We don't know the specifics and really shouldn't be commenting on a 2nd regurgitation of the facts. Unless parents who are actually in the class choose to comment - it's dumb to form an opinion on 2nd hand info.
I know the parent of a child in the class, and op's description is what I have heard, as well.
The thing that amazed me was that the kids were told the first day that there wouldn't be enough seats for all 50, so they should arrive early each day or they would have to sit on the floor. Not sure if this was a temporary thing. If not, that would upset me more than the large class. If you are going to experiment, make sure you are properly equipped.
Still again second hand info. If everyone is so concerned about it, talk to Ms Main for goodness sake. Why is this being discussed here?
Anonymous wrote:I am the OP. I wasn't complaining, just asking if anyone had heard of this sort of thing before. One of the teachers will be going on maternity leave in a few months so perhaps this is a way of making sure the kids have at least one good teacher if the substitute is a dud.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: 11:08 here. I don't beleive this was a higher up decision though. It was driven by the teachers. Beyond that I don't know the details of how the class will be run and neither does OP so there is no point debating this without the facts.
Lazy-ass teachers!! This means that they are doing only half the work they are being paid to do. Otherwise, what's the point?
This is a bit harsh, don't you think? I highly doubt teachers would have that much power in the public system (i.e "teacher driven?")