Anonymous wrote:Maybe IT would consider adding a third class, to break down the numbers?
Anonymous wrote:I have worked in early childhood education for the past 12 years and I have a hard time imagining how it can "work" to have 22-23 three year olds in a class. Regardless of having 3 adults it is just too many children at that particular young age. In order for a program to receive NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children) a class cannot have any more than 18 children as a maximum in a class. See http://www.naeyc.org/files/academy/file/Teacher-Child_Ratio_Chart_9_16_08.pdf
Anonymous wrote:I have worked in early childhood education for the past 12 years and I have a hard time imagining how it can "work" to have 22-23 three year olds in a class. Regardless of having 3 adults it is just too many children at that particular young age. In order for a program to receive NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children) a class cannot have any more than 18 children as a maximum in a class. See http://www.naeyc.org/files/academy/file/Teacher-Child_Ratio_Chart_9_16_08.pdf
Anonymous wrote:I have worked in early childhood education for the past 12 years and I have a hard time imagining how it can "work" to have 22-23 three year olds in a class. Regardless of having 3 adults it is just too many children at that particular young age. In order for a program to receive NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children) a class cannot have any more than 18 children as a maximum in a class. See http://www.naeyc.org/files/academy/file/Teacher-Child_Ratio_Chart_9_16_08.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IT has 3 year old classes with 22 -23 students.
IT parents, is that ratio correct? I'm a PS parent and it certainly doesn't seem like that many kids in the class, though I haven't counted since the 1st day when I think there were 17-18. Plus isn't there a para-professional in the class as well, at least PT?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MV has smaller class sizes, dual language, better ratios. (Esp important for the little ones) http://www.mundoverdepcs.org/our-teaching-team/ IT has 3 year old classes with 22 -23 students.
MV has its act together, family handbook on website, (IT has promised one but nothing has been published yet, and principal's corner has not been updated since July!)
Also with MV all students have FREE breakfast and snack. At IT only breakfast.
Let's not turn this into a war about which school is better. That's silly (and petty). It is apparent that most parents are happy with the school they have chosen whether it be IT or MV. Moreover, they are completely different models and are not in competition with each other for anything other than middle class parents. IMO, either you want dual language or you don't. Both schools are in their infancy and whether or not either school will withstand the test of time, remains to be seen, so put your pom-poms down. Remember, it's just good to have options.
Anonymous wrote:The criteria for location for IT is the same criteria just about every other single charter school in the city has. Nothing is unique about their criteria--The harsh reality is they will be lucky to get ANYTHING that has some of those criteria, and super lucky to get all those criteria. Its not like their are a bunch of appealing, empty, affordable, great locations just waiting to be rented by a charter school. People should recall that charter school funding and facilities has been a major issue in the city for years and was a huge issue in the mayoral race within education circles.