Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But what if it’s from Swarthmore?
Excellent if you want to go for careers requiring phD in engineering(R&D): they place into top5 phD regularly
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Names would be nice, ones that aren't MIT and Caltech
Best privates known for rigorous engineering coursework (and not much weedout because getting in is the weedout):
Stanford, CMU, ivies with real engineering(Princeton, Cornell, Penn, Columbia, Harvard, and yes even Yale is now on that list),
Northwestern, JHU, Rice, Duke, WashU, Vanderbilt.
Top publics: UCB, GT, Michigan, UIUC, UWash, Purdue
Some of these are absolute tops for BME others are tops for mechanical or nano, others are strong in every E discipline. You have to look through each department in the Eschool.
Anonymous wrote:But what if it’s from Swarthmore?
Anonymous wrote:But what if it’s from Swarthmore?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one uses US News for engineering rankings.
The only people who say this are those whose favored school is low-ranked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one uses US News for engineering rankings.
The only people who say this are those whose favored school is low-ranked.
Anonymous wrote:First figure out what kind of engineering they’re interested in. Big state schools are often great for engineering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Names would be nice, ones that aren't MIT and Caltech
Best privates known for rigorous engineering coursework (and not much weedout because getting in is the weedout):
Stanford, CMU, ivies with real engineering(Princeton, Cornell, Penn, Columbia, Harvard, and yes even Yale is now on that list),
Northwestern, JHU, Rice, Duke, WashU, Vanderbilt.
Top publics: UCB, GT, Michigan, UIUC, UWash, Purdue
Some of these are absolute tops for BME others are tops for mechanical or nano, others are strong in every E discipline. You have to look through each department in the Eschool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a hiring manager, I do not care much about rankings. Top few might be better, but my experience is that what really matters for on the job performance -- so what I mostly care about when hiring -- are:
Which specific degree?
Which specialty within that degree?
Did the student take the rigorous upper-level in-major courses?
What concrete skills do they bring?
If they did a senior project, what was it?
ABET sets a high floor. In my experience, almost all engineering programs are rigorous. No one accidentally gets an engineering degree. It takes a lot of hard work, even for the bright capable students.
C'mon now. If you work for a major engineering recruiter and I mean a real player, you know darn well there are certain schools that are targeted for recruiting because they produce the best. If you work in the field, you already know this and the schools that are targeted. If you work for just a company that hires engineers and not a real player, then this might not make sense to you. I get that.
Hee hee. Is this a company/firm that hires engineers and pays them? As opposed to...umm...what exactly? Im curious as to an example of a "real player" vs a 'fake player', i guess.
I think if you don't know then you are not one.
This is childish...Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Names would be nice, ones that aren't MIT and Caltech
Best privates known for rigorous engineering coursework (and not much weedout because getting in is the weedout):
Stanford, CMU, ivies with real engineering(Princeton, Cornell, Penn, Columbia, Harvard, and yes even Yale is now on that list),
Northwestern, JHU, Rice, Duke, WashU, Vanderbilt.
Top publics: UCB, GT, Michigan, UIUC, UWash, Purdue
Some of these are absolute tops for BME others are tops for mechanical or nano, others are strong in every E discipline. You have to look through each department in the Eschool.
Almost seems like you're saying don't go to Dartmouth or Brown for engineering!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a hiring manager, I do not care much about rankings. Top few might be better, but my experience is that what really matters for on the job performance -- so what I mostly care about when hiring -- are:
Which specific degree?
Which specialty within that degree?
Did the student take the rigorous upper-level in-major courses?
What concrete skills do they bring?
If they did a senior project, what was it?
ABET sets a high floor. In my experience, almost all engineering programs are rigorous. No one accidentally gets an engineering degree. It takes a lot of hard work, even for the bright capable students.
C'mon now. If you work for a major engineering recruiter and I mean a real player, you know darn well there are certain schools that are targeted for recruiting because they produce the best. If you work in the field, you already know this and the schools that are targeted. If you work for just a company that hires engineers and not a real player, then this might not make sense to you. I get that.
Hee hee. Is this a company/firm that hires engineers and pays them? As opposed to...umm...what exactly? Im curious as to an example of a "real player" vs a 'fake player', i guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Names would be nice, ones that aren't MIT and Caltech
Best privates known for rigorous engineering coursework (and not much weedout because getting in is the weedout):
Stanford, CMU, ivies with real engineering(Princeton, Cornell, Penn, Columbia, Harvard, and yes even Yale is now on that list),
Northwestern, JHU, Rice, Duke, WashU, Vanderbilt.
Top publics: UCB, GT, Michigan, UIUC, UWash, Purdue
Some of these are absolute tops for BME others are tops for mechanical or nano, others are strong in every E discipline. You have to look through each department in the Eschool.