Anonymous wrote:My dad was like this. The week after he died it was like my mom won the lottery. Brand new car (had never had one in her life), booked tons of travel, planned a big addition on her house. It’s gross.

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

It's her family, that makes it her business.

And she's not telling anyone what to do, just expressing that it's too bad that her IL's frugality has led to them not enjoying their money, which I think is an empathetic take.

I understand because I have similar feelings about my MIL. My FIL was very controlling when he was alive and wouldn't allow them to do a lot of things they could afford to do. Now that he's gone MIL is doing some of those things but she also often expresses that she feels guilty when she does them, like she shouldn't be spending the money (HER money, fully half of it is from her pension and savings, she worked for 30 years). DH and I both strongly encourage her to spend it without guilt and remind her she deserves to enjoy her life. But it is sad to me that it's so hard for her to do so, in part because FIL really criticized/restricted spending money on anything that wasn't completely necessary, and she still lives in that shadow.

Yes it’s not “her” family. Very few of you on DCUM have earned the right to call your in laws “family.” You’re far too nasty towards them.

OP wishing her ILs had spent *more* of their own hard-earned money is now somehow nasty?

You're an idiot, PP.

Oh cmon. OP hates her in laws. You all do.

DP, what is wrong with you? Maybe you're just projecting because you hate your own inlaws?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

It's her family, that makes it her business.

And she's not telling anyone what to do, just expressing that it's too bad that her IL's frugality has led to them not enjoying their money, which I think is an empathetic take.

I understand because I have similar feelings about my MIL. My FIL was very controlling when he was alive and wouldn't allow them to do a lot of things they could afford to do. Now that he's gone MIL is doing some of those things but she also often expresses that she feels guilty when she does them, like she shouldn't be spending the money (HER money, fully half of it is from her pension and savings, she worked for 30 years). DH and I both strongly encourage her to spend it without guilt and remind her she deserves to enjoy her life. But it is sad to me that it's so hard for her to do so, in part because FIL really criticized/restricted spending money on anything that wasn't completely necessary, and she still lives in that shadow.

Yes it’s not “her” family. Very few of you on DCUM have earned the right to call your in laws “family.” You’re far too nasty towards them.

OP wishing her ILs had spent *more* of their own hard-earned money is now somehow nasty?

You're an idiot, PP.

DP. She said they were cheap and stingy because they lived a financially conservative lifestyle. Yes, that is nasty. I wonder what her DH thinks about that.

Really wish they were able to enjoy the $$ and use the money to make their lives easier - getting a cleaning lady, other help around the house, nicer meals out.

hopefully the MIL decides to live life a bit easier but frugality is hard wired into their brains.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can look at this a couple of different ways. I think you have to take a generous view and think he was more concerned with making sure that his money would last his whole life and his wife would not want for anything after he passed than that he was cheap or stingy. Many older people keep using old appliances that aren't functioning at top performance because using something until it actually dies was just the way things went.

And those appliances will last longer than a new one purchased today, even if not at top performance.

Oh BS.

Not necessarily "BS." DP

Absolutely. My 6 year old Bosch dw died. When I asked the repair person what to buy instead he said 7 years is the life expectancy now.

When we bought and renovated our house, literally the only thing we kept was the refrigerator, which was old (perhaps ancient?) then. It was moved onto the basement, and we figured we'd have to replace it soon. Eleven years later, it is still running fine, and the "new" one is making all sorts of noises. It will likely have to be replaced soon. The light doesn't work in the old one, and some of the shelves are loose, and it's a side-by-side (terrible), but it keeps chugging along.

You know that light is easy to replace, right? You can do it yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

It's her family, that makes it her business.

And she's not telling anyone what to do, just expressing that it's too bad that her IL's frugality has led to them not enjoying their money, which I think is an empathetic take.

I understand because I have similar feelings about my MIL. My FIL was very controlling when he was alive and wouldn't allow them to do a lot of things they could afford to do. Now that he's gone MIL is doing some of those things but she also often expresses that she feels guilty when she does them, like she shouldn't be spending the money (HER money, fully half of it is from her pension and savings, she worked for 30 years). DH and I both strongly encourage her to spend it without guilt and remind her she deserves to enjoy her life. But it is sad to me that it's so hard for her to do so, in part because FIL really criticized/restricted spending money on anything that wasn't completely necessary, and she still lives in that shadow.

Yes it’s not “her” family. Very few of you on DCUM have earned the right to call your in laws “family.” You’re far too nasty towards them.

OP wishing her ILs had spent *more* of their own hard-earned money is now somehow nasty?

You're an idiot, PP.

Oh cmon. OP hates her in laws. You all do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

It's her family, that makes it her business.

And she's not telling anyone what to do, just expressing that it's too bad that her IL's frugality has led to them not enjoying their money, which I think is an empathetic take.

I understand because I have similar feelings about my MIL. My FIL was very controlling when he was alive and wouldn't allow them to do a lot of things they could afford to do. Now that he's gone MIL is doing some of those things but she also often expresses that she feels guilty when she does them, like she shouldn't be spending the money (HER money, fully half of it is from her pension and savings, she worked for 30 years). DH and I both strongly encourage her to spend it without guilt and remind her she deserves to enjoy her life. But it is sad to me that it's so hard for her to do so, in part because FIL really criticized/restricted spending money on anything that wasn't completely necessary, and she still lives in that shadow.

Yes it’s not “her” family. Very few of you on DCUM have earned the right to call your in laws “family.” You’re far too nasty towards them.

OP wishing her ILs had spent *more* of their own hard-earned money is now somehow nasty?

You're an idiot, PP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can look at this a couple of different ways. I think you have to take a generous view and think he was more concerned with making sure that his money would last his whole life and his wife would not want for anything after he passed than that he was cheap or stingy. Many older people keep using old appliances that aren't functioning at top performance because using something until it actually dies was just the way things went.

And those appliances will last longer than a new one purchased today, even if not at top performance.

Oh BS.

Not necessarily "BS." DP

Absolutely. My 6 year old Bosch dw died. When I asked the repair person what to buy instead he said 7 years is the life expectancy now.

When we bought and renovated our house, literally the only thing we kept was the refrigerator, which was old (perhaps ancient?) then. It was moved onto the basement, and we figured we'd have to replace it soon. Eleven years later, it is still running fine, and the "new" one is making all sorts of noises. It will likely have to be replaced soon. The light doesn't work in the old one, and some of the shelves are loose, and it's a side-by-side (terrible), but it keeps chugging along.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

It's her family, that makes it her business.

And she's not telling anyone what to do, just expressing that it's too bad that her IL's frugality has led to them not enjoying their money, which I think is an empathetic take.

I understand because I have similar feelings about my MIL. My FIL was very controlling when he was alive and wouldn't allow them to do a lot of things they could afford to do. Now that he's gone MIL is doing some of those things but she also often expresses that she feels guilty when she does them, like she shouldn't be spending the money (HER money, fully half of it is from her pension and savings, she worked for 30 years). DH and I both strongly encourage her to spend it without guilt and remind her she deserves to enjoy her life. But it is sad to me that it's so hard for her to do so, in part because FIL really criticized/restricted spending money on anything that wasn't completely necessary, and she still lives in that shadow.

Yes it’s not “her” family. Very few of you on DCUM have earned the right to call your in laws “family.” You’re far too nasty towards them.

OP wishing her ILs had spent *more* of their own hard-earned money is now somehow nasty?

You're an idiot, PP.

Oh cmon. OP hates her in laws. You all do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can look at this a couple of different ways. I think you have to take a generous view and think he was more concerned with making sure that his money would last his whole life and his wife would not want for anything after he passed than that he was cheap or stingy. Many older people keep using old appliances that aren't functioning at top performance because using something until it actually dies was just the way things went.

And those appliances will last longer than a new one purchased today, even if not at top performance.

Oh BS.

Not necessarily "BS." DP

Absolutely. My 6 year old Bosch dw died. When I asked the repair person what to buy instead he said 7 years is the life expectancy now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:just a vent to be honest.

the In-Laws live in a modest 55+ community and it took a lot of effort to get them to move about 5 years ago. It was great.
the old house was run down and needed to be updated.

The lived conservatively, nice cars but 10 years old, vacations but nothing flashy. we always worried that they would run out of money.
They wouldn't get a new dishwasher even though the last one was a POS. Mostly due to the FIL who ran the house.

FIL passes away and we find out they have $7mm investment account.

Really wish they were able to enjoy the $$ and use the money to make their lives easier - getting a cleaning lady, other help around the house, nicer meals out.

hopefully the MIL decides to live life a bit easier but frugality is hard wired into their brains.

The bolded probably weighed heavily on them, and are you not glad that the burden of taking care of indigent parents did not fall upon your husband? I wonder if your in-laws grew up poor. I gotta admit, that I am somewhat like your in-laws. I grew up extremely poor wearing handmedowns, thrift store clothing and eating the big block of government cheese. Through hard work and some luck, I have what many wold call the American dream. I worry about running out of money all the time (the little girl in me) and it affects the way I refuse to spend money. Will I have enough for longterm care, if I live that long. Will I have enough to leave DC a decent inheritance. My DC does not have the mental money issues that I have because he has never been without. It is what it is, and if you have never been concerned about your next meal, bus fare, or even a good pair of shoes you have no clue of psychological issues that money has on the psyche longterm.

It is good, PP, that you admit that these are "psychological issues" that can and should be overcome. OP is just wishing that her ILs had recognized that, too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

It's her family, that makes it her business.

And she's not telling anyone what to do, just expressing that it's too bad that her IL's frugality has led to them not enjoying their money, which I think is an empathetic take.

I understand because I have similar feelings about my MIL. My FIL was very controlling when he was alive and wouldn't allow them to do a lot of things they could afford to do. Now that he's gone MIL is doing some of those things but she also often expresses that she feels guilty when she does them, like she shouldn't be spending the money (HER money, fully half of it is from her pension and savings, she worked for 30 years). DH and I both strongly encourage her to spend it without guilt and remind her she deserves to enjoy her life. But it is sad to me that it's so hard for her to do so, in part because FIL really criticized/restricted spending money on anything that wasn't completely necessary, and she still lives in that shadow.

Yes it’s not “her” family. Very few of you on DCUM have earned the right to call your in laws “family.” You’re far too nasty towards them.

OP wishing her ILs had spent *more* of their own hard-earned money is now somehow nasty?

You're an idiot, PP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it's any of your business OP. Are you worried your MIL was "forced" to live like that? I don't see where you come in the picture.

It's her family, that makes it her business.

And she's not telling anyone what to do, just expressing that it's too bad that her IL's frugality has led to them not enjoying their money, which I think is an empathetic take.

I understand because I have similar feelings about my MIL. My FIL was very controlling when he was alive and wouldn't allow them to do a lot of things they could afford to do. Now that he's gone MIL is doing some of those things but she also often expresses that she feels guilty when she does them, like she shouldn't be spending the money (HER money, fully half of it is from her pension and savings, she worked for 30 years). DH and I both strongly encourage her to spend it without guilt and remind her she deserves to enjoy her life. But it is sad to me that it's so hard for her to do so, in part because FIL really criticized/restricted spending money on anything that wasn't completely necessary, and she still lives in that shadow.

Yes it’s not “her” family. Very few of you on DCUM have earned the right to call your in laws “family.” You’re far too nasty towards them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can look at this a couple of different ways. I think you have to take a generous view and think he was more concerned with making sure that his money would last his whole life and his wife would not want for anything after he passed than that he was cheap or stingy. Many older people keep using old appliances that aren't functioning at top performance because using something until it actually dies was just the way things went.

And those appliances will last longer than a new one purchased today, even if not at top performance.

Oh BS.

Not necessarily "BS." DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:just a vent to be honest.

the In-Laws live in a modest 55+ community and it took a lot of effort to get them to move about 5 years ago. It was great.
the old house was run down and needed to be updated.

The lived conservatively, nice cars but 10 years old, vacations but nothing flashy. we always worried that they would run out of money.
They wouldn't get a new dishwasher even though the last one was a POS. Mostly due to the FIL who ran the house.

FIL passes away and we find out they have $7mm investment account.

Really wish they were able to enjoy the $$ and use the money to make their lives easier - getting a cleaning lady, other help around the house, nicer meals out.

hopefully the MIL decides to live life a bit easier but frugality is hard wired into their brains.

The bolded probably weighed heavily on them, and are you not glad that the burden of taking care of indigent parents did not fall upon your husband? I wonder if your in-laws grew up poor. I gotta admit, that I am somewhat like your in-laws. I grew up extremely poor wearing handmedowns, thrift store clothing and eating the big block of government cheese. Through hard work and some luck, I have what many wold call the American dream. I worry about running out of money all the time (the little girl in me) and it affects the way I refuse to spend money. Will I have enough for longterm care, if I live that long. Will I have enough to leave DC a decent inheritance. My DC does not have the mental money issues that I have because he has never been without. It is what it is, and if you have never been concerned about your next meal, bus fare, or even a good pair of shoes you have no clue of psychological issues that money has on the psyche longterm.

It is good, PP, that you admit that these are "psychological issues" that can and should be overcome. OP is just wishing that her ILs had recognized that, too.