Anonymous wrote:What's the intended major? If you don't want to specify, at least indicate a range. CS, Engineering, Science, social science or humanities can be very different.
Anonymous wrote:Those ECs seem very strong to me. My child had about 1/10 of your child's ECs - a couple of casual clubs, a bit of volunteering, but no jobs, no internships, no sports, no music, no leadership (but strong grades/scores/teacher recs) and applied to Williams/Amherst/Swarthmore and got in to one of the three (and several other top 10 LACs that they also would have been very happy at.)
That was from a DC public, so maybe the expectations for kids at private schools are higher. But I think the counselor might just trying to lower your expectations; it's all a crapshoot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our kid like this ended up at Cornell.
From a private. The essays are critically important ….
Cornell is pretty easy to get into if you work with the right private admissions consultant. Or if you just do your research and understand what each school is looking for — that research shows in the essays.
What do they want?
Anonymous wrote:SLACS!
Anonymous wrote:How's your budget, OP? I would focus on fit over prestige, but I would think a highly-rejective school could be an option if you can commit to the NPC cost and your student applies ED. Again, though, fit over prestige.
To answer your question, my daughter got in to Carleton and W&M (OOS) with similar stats/ECs, but was WL'd from T20s and rejected from Ivies during RD. Enrolled at W&M and it's been excellent.
Also, I wouldn't overindex on the "we hired the counselor too late" sentiment. Many people don't hire counselors at all, and it's 100% in the counselor's interest to be like "well I could have maybe helped you if only you'd come to me earlier; as it is, (sigh) we'll see what we can do". Under that premise, any success your kid sees is the counselor's doing, and any lack of success is your fault. Don't buy it. There will be lots of great options for your kid, even if you don't work with that (or any) counselor.
Anonymous wrote:How's your budget, OP? I would focus on fit over prestige, but I would think a highly-rejective school could be an option if you can commit to the NPC cost and your student applies ED. Again, though, fit over prestige.
To answer your question, my daughter got in to Carleton and W&M (OOS) with similar stats/ECs, but was WL'd from T20s and rejected from Ivies during RD. Enrolled at W&M and it's been excellent.
Also, I wouldn't overindex on the "we hired the counselor too late" sentiment. Many people don't hire counselors at all, and it's 100% in the counselor's interest to be like "well I could have maybe helped you if only you'd come to me earlier; as it is, (sigh) we'll see what we can do". Under that premise, any success your kid sees is the counselor's doing, and any lack of success is your fault. Don't buy it. There will be lots of great options for your kid, even if you don't work with that (or any) counselor.
Anonymous wrote:Should really look at Naviance data, but I can’t imagine OP being rejected by UF or NYU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You will have the best results with slacs, if you are willing to go that route. Anything outside Williams is possible. Otherwise, probably looking at 25-50 in national universities.
There is no difference between Williams and other t10 LACs. Stop trolling.
There is in terms of admission from our private. Anything else is doable for top third of class.
That is only relevant to your private.
Probably not. You are just triggered by Williams for some reason. I, on the other hand, have no connections to the school and am a neutral reporter.
It only says your school is not a feeder to Williams. Ours sends 3-4 each year to Williams but often 0 to Pomona.
No we send kids to Williams but they need to be in top 5 percent of class. Also send kids to Pomona but it’s an easier admit.