Anonymous wrote:I've seen a parent on this website complain on several threads that they were told here not to apply ED to Williams because they weren't hooked. Their kid did and was admitted and the conclusion was that DCUM was wrong.
I always find this amusing because the Williams admissions office tells applicants not to apply ED if they aren't hooked as part of the info session. Odds are actually better in RD at Williams if unhooked. One person getting in early unhooked changes none of this.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, trust the naviance data. Admissions is so school specific. Most of the advice here comes from parents in large public schools with grade inflation and creates an impression that only an unweighted 4.0 is viable anywhere when that is not the case for other schools.
Anonymous wrote:DCUM - don’t ED to WASP unless hooked
Reality - unhooked and got in ED
Kid was exactly what school was looking for; not at all surprised DC was admitted.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure yet as kid is a junior and hasn't applied yet, but I've noticed that Naviance shows him as a likely or at least plausible admit at some schools that DCUM members seem to think are out of range for someone with his stats. That leads me to think that school context matters a lot.
Anonymous wrote:I've seen a parent on this website complain on several threads that they were told here not to apply ED to Williams because they weren't hooked. Their kid did and was admitted and the conclusion was that DCUM was wrong.
I always find this amusing because the Williams admissions office tells applicants not to apply ED if they aren't hooked as part of the info session. Odds are actually better in RD at Williams if unhooked. One person getting in early unhooked changes none of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What was the major difference between your IRL admissions results and what others shared here on DCUM?
Now that the application cycle is over, I can see a lot of differences between IRL and DCUM.
GPA: When I first came here a year ago, I was severely depressed seeing so many 4.0 uw. IRL a 4.0 is not necessary for students from our high school to get into top colleges, not even 3.9 or 3.8. Once the GPA is within range per Naviance, it matters much less. Some 4.0s were rejected, while some lower GPAs were accepted. For some T20 even a T10 colleges, the accepted GPA range can be quite a bit lower than what DCUM would make you believe. This is for unhooked applicants.
Rigor: Rigor matters a ton at our school. Our school does not offer AP classes, but the advanced courses are definitely not easy, even just to earn a B+. Colleges recognized that during application review (signaling).
National awards: No. Definitely not necessary.
I agree with PP here but the issue is you don’t know which lower GPA on Naviance belongs to an athlete or legacy so you can’t be sure what is “within range” for your own unhooked kid.
Anonymous wrote:DCUM - don’t ED to WASP unless hooked
Reality - unhooked and got in ED
Kid was exactly what school was looking for; not at all surprised DC was admitted.
Anonymous wrote:Specific high school context matters more than conventional DCUM wisdom.
At our small high school, the unweighted 3.9-ish crowd with high rigor got into Harvard, Yale, Stanford but the surprise for us was that our DC's friend group (3.6-3.8) got into very good schools (so-called "new Ivies" like Northwestern, Georgetown, Tufts, WashU, so-called Ivy "plus" schools like UChicago). They also did very well at NYU and USC.
DCUM conventional wisdom would not have predicted that. But DCUM wisdom is not high school specific. For our school, it was not helpful at all to read comments.