Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to pay even more for a sh%tty school system that threatens to ruin staff summer vacation plans with four months notice as part of some stupid game TT thinks he can play, or refuses to offer any sort of meaningful acceleration for gifted students before middle school.
+1. MCPS is a monster. At some point we have to starve the monster if we're going to bring it to heel. It's not like we're actually getting anything for our money anyway. A cut here and a cut there isn't going to change the quality what we get so long as we're still paying Niki Hazel $250K a year to ruin the school system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Thanks so much for sharing. And it will probably be worse than this, because this list only goes up to $90M in cuts but it looks like Council is planning on cutting $108M.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to pay even more for a sh%tty school system that threatens to ruin staff summer vacation plans with four months notice as part of some stupid game TT thinks he can play, or refuses to offer any sort of meaningful acceleration for gifted students before middle school.
+1. MCPS is a monster. At some point we have to starve the monster if we're going to bring it to heel. It's not like we're actually getting anything for our money anyway. A cut here and a cut there isn't going to change the quality what we get so long as we're still paying Niki Hazel $250K a year to ruin the school system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Thanks so much for sharing. And it will probably be worse than this, because this list only goes up to $90M in cuts but it looks like Council is planning on cutting $108M.
$180M
It could theoretically be up to $180M, but Council staff has recommended cutting "only" $108M so that is probably the ceiling. This document covers how MCPS would absorb $90M in cuts (laying off 850 staff plus cutting everyone's COLAs) but they would need to do more to cover an $108M cut.
It's not a cut. MCPS will get an increased budget next year despite decreasing enrollment.
Ah, you're one of those pedants who pretends that inflation doesn't exist, I take it? Yes, technically it is not a cut in straight dollars. But practically speaking, it is a very large cut.
LOL. No cut to the party budget or the personal credit cards! No cut to the embezzler diesel school bus company! They are getting a massive increase!
$180M is nothing in a $3.74B budget.
Oh shut up. It's idiots like you that lead to hundreds of layoffs and our school system being underfunded. This is absolutely a panic-worthy situation. Even if there was enough in waste to cut to plug this hole (there's not), Central Office wouldn't do anyway and the Board of Ed wouldn't make them, so either way there's going to be tons of cuts unless County Council changes course.
Sorry, not a BOE member.
How does pointing out massive waste lead to layoffs? Please explain.
It wasn't panic-worthy when the Maryland State Board of Education declared the $168,000,000 EV bus contract to have been illegally awarded and the CESO AUDIT paid for by the BOE said the MCPS Transportation Department was near collapse financially? But now suddenly panic!!!!!!!!
How is it you say CO and the BOE won't cut any waste and so now the cuts come from only the Council? How does MCPS Central Office and BOE get a pass on your crisis?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Thanks so much for sharing. And it will probably be worse than this, because this list only goes up to $90M in cuts but it looks like Council is planning on cutting $108M.
$180M
It could theoretically be up to $180M, but Council staff has recommended cutting "only" $108M so that is probably the ceiling. This document covers how MCPS would absorb $90M in cuts (laying off 850 staff plus cutting everyone's COLAs) but they would need to do more to cover an $108M cut.
It's not a cut. MCPS will get an increased budget next year despite decreasing enrollment.
Ah, you're one of those pedants who pretends that inflation doesn't exist, I take it? Yes, technically it is not a cut in straight dollars. But practically speaking, it is a very large cut.
LOL. No cut to the party budget or the personal credit cards! No cut to the embezzler diesel school bus company! They are getting a massive increase!
$180M is nothing in a $3.74B budget.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Thanks so much for sharing. And it will probably be worse than this, because this list only goes up to $90M in cuts but it looks like Council is planning on cutting $108M.
$180M
It could theoretically be up to $180M, but Council staff has recommended cutting "only" $108M so that is probably the ceiling. This document covers how MCPS would absorb $90M in cuts (laying off 850 staff plus cutting everyone's COLAs) but they would need to do more to cover an $108M cut.
It's not a cut. MCPS will get an increased budget next year despite decreasing enrollment.
Ah, you're one of those pedants who pretends that inflation doesn't exist, I take it? Yes, technically it is not a cut in straight dollars. But practically speaking, it is a very large cut.
LOL. No cut to the party budget or the personal credit cards! No cut to the embezzler diesel school bus company! They are getting a massive increase!
$180M is nothing in a $3.74B budget.
Oh shut up. It's idiots like you that lead to hundreds of layoffs and our school system being underfunded. This is absolutely a panic-worthy situation. Even if there was enough in waste to cut to plug this hole (there's not), Central Office wouldn't do anyway and the Board of Ed wouldn't make them, so either way there's going to be tons of cuts unless County Council changes course.
Anonymous wrote:Why are there budget cuts? I moved here 5 years ago. My taxes keep going up and all I hear is the public schools is why. I don't even send my kids to the publics because it seems like a chromebook hellscape staffed by people so insistent that preschoolers read trans books against parental consent that they went to the supreme court. Now there are budget cuts? Am I going to be told my taxes are going up again as a result??
Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants to pay even more for a sh%tty school system that threatens to ruin staff summer vacation plans with four months notice as part of some stupid game TT thinks he can play, or refuses to offer any sort of meaningful acceleration for gifted students before middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Adam Pagnucco with the e-mails and links: https://montgomeryperspective.com/2026/05/12/taylor-to-council-please-dont-do-this/
Anonymous wrote:Why are there budget cuts? I moved here 5 years ago. My taxes keep going up and all I hear is the public schools is why. I don't even send my kids to the publics because it seems like a chromebook hellscape staffed by people so insistent that preschoolers read trans books against parental consent that they went to the supreme court. Now there are budget cuts? Am I going to be told my taxes are going up again as a result??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Thanks so much for sharing. And it will probably be worse than this, because this list only goes up to $90M in cuts but it looks like Council is planning on cutting $108M.
$180M
It could theoretically be up to $180M, but Council staff has recommended cutting "only" $108M so that is probably the ceiling. This document covers how MCPS would absorb $90M in cuts (laying off 850 staff plus cutting everyone's COLAs) but they would need to do more to cover an $108M cut.
It's not a cut. MCPS will get an increased budget next year despite decreasing enrollment.
Ah, you're one of those pedants who pretends that inflation doesn't exist, I take it? Yes, technically it is not a cut in straight dollars. But practically speaking, it is a very large cut.
LOL. No cut to the party budget or the personal credit cards! No cut to the embezzler diesel school bus company! They are getting a massive increase!
$180M is nothing in a $3.74B budget.
only if you ignore enrollment declinesAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Thanks so much for sharing. And it will probably be worse than this, because this list only goes up to $90M in cuts but it looks like Council is planning on cutting $108M.
$180M
It could theoretically be up to $180M, but Council staff has recommended cutting "only" $108M so that is probably the ceiling. This document covers how MCPS would absorb $90M in cuts (laying off 850 staff plus cutting everyone's COLAs) but they would need to do more to cover an $108M cut.
It's not a cut. MCPS will get an increased budget next year despite decreasing enrollment.
Ah, you're one of those pedants who pretends that inflation doesn't exist, I take it? Yes, technically it is not a cut in straight dollars. But practically speaking, it is a very large cut.
Nope. Under state law the Council must approve a budget that meets "maintenance of effort" which means per pupil spending is maintained after accounting for inflation. MCPS is asking for a massive amount over that minimum.
It is not a cut. You can argue they need the massive funding INCREASE they are requesting if you want.
MOE does not account for inflation.
Also MCPS is not asking for a massive amount over last year, it is asking for 5% more. County Council is considering giving them 0-2% more than last year. Inflation is 3.8% over the last year. So it is absolutely a cut in real terms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty much public: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OA8HANnsPlM7-xyvfma4H_0nRLQRYaKo/view
Thanks so much for sharing. And it will probably be worse than this, because this list only goes up to $90M in cuts but it looks like Council is planning on cutting $108M.
$180M
It could theoretically be up to $180M, but Council staff has recommended cutting "only" $108M so that is probably the ceiling. This document covers how MCPS would absorb $90M in cuts (laying off 850 staff plus cutting everyone's COLAs) but they would need to do more to cover an $108M cut.
It's not a cut. MCPS will get an increased budget next year despite decreasing enrollment.
Ah, you're one of those pedants who pretends that inflation doesn't exist, I take it? Yes, technically it is not a cut in straight dollars. But practically speaking, it is a very large cut.