Anonymous wrote:Some “afterschool activity buses, clubs, and sports” are actually covered by federal funds / state funds, so I doubt getting rid of them necessarily would impact the budget.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much could be saved by cutting afterschool activity buses, clubs, and sports in middle schools. Surrounding counties go without those things.
It would be a loss, but it's better to lose after school activities than lose staff that affect the school day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much could be saved by cutting afterschool activity buses, clubs, and sports in middle schools. Surrounding counties go without those things.
It would be a loss, but it's better to lose after school activities than lose staff that affect the school day.
Agreed. Some of these cuts are painful, but necessary.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much could be saved by cutting afterschool activity buses, clubs, and sports in middle schools. Surrounding counties go without those things.
It would be a loss, but it's better to lose after school activities than lose staff that affect the school day.
Anonymous wrote:Middle school is the one place where cuts should never happen. Having more than 20 preteens in a single classroom is a powder keg waiting to blow up in a fury of racism, sexism, and aggression.
Anonymous wrote:my guess is that cutting middle school teachers is part of the idea to consolidate some middle schools so maybe it wont affect much?
Anonymous wrote:my guess is that cutting middle school teachers is part of the idea to consolidate some middle schools so maybe it wont affect much?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle school is the one place where cuts should never happen. Having more than 20 preteens in a single classroom is a powder keg waiting to blow up in a fury of racism, sexism, and aggression.
Yeah, I wonder why they picked middle school for the teacher cuts? Is there something in particular they're looking at for cost savings in middle school? Maybe getting rid of electives?
Getting rid of electives would easily be the dumbest thing they could do. Some kids only go to school because of electives.
The state math minutes mandate is likely going to require them to cut back to one elective per kid-- they should really use those positions to increase the number of math teachers to cover the extra math minutes, but maybe they'll just cut them and increase math class sizes instead?
The state of MD is delusional to think 15 extra minutes of math per daily is more beneficial than the arts and what they do for kids. Everything is falling apart and no one is doing anything about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle school is the one place where cuts should never happen. Having more than 20 preteens in a single classroom is a powder keg waiting to blow up in a fury of racism, sexism, and aggression.
Yeah, I wonder why they picked middle school for the teacher cuts? Is there something in particular they're looking at for cost savings in middle school? Maybe getting rid of electives?
Getting rid of electives would easily be the dumbest thing they could do. Some kids only go to school because of electives.
The state math minutes mandate is likely going to require them to cut back to one elective per kid-- they should really use those positions to increase the number of math teachers to cover the extra math minutes, but maybe they'll just cut them and increase math class sizes instead?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Middle school is the one place where cuts should never happen. Having more than 20 preteens in a single classroom is a powder keg waiting to blow up in a fury of racism, sexism, and aggression.
Yeah, I wonder why they picked middle school for the teacher cuts? Is there something in particular they're looking at for cost savings in middle school? Maybe getting rid of electives?
Getting rid of electives would easily be the dumbest thing they could do. Some kids only go to school because of electives.