Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Level below ECNL RL (see link).
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSa4f_4kVmC/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=c6b88b7f-335c-4188-86ac-756c19f9e512
It's team based not club based, so top teams in each age group will make a playoff next summer combined with mid-level RL teams that don't make the RL playoffs.
No promotion to RL based on performance since that is based on club overall performance (U13-U19). But then in 2027-2028, top teams would compete against each other in a "National" tier.
But the 'National' tier would still be below RL.
Yes
It depends who you ask - there's definitely a believe amongst some clubs that N1 will sit next to RL especially in some regions like the North East where you have some vast disparity between good RL teams and bad ones. Like when you have multiple teams that win 0 games in RL brackets. Most of the clubs looking at N1 by us are not happy to have to play in playoff structures with low level RL teams but if you don't have strong teams across 6 age groups (which with the MLSN expansion is pretty tough now), you don't really have much of a choice now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Level below ECNL RL (see link).
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSa4f_4kVmC/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=c6b88b7f-335c-4188-86ac-756c19f9e512
It's team based not club based, so top teams in each age group will make a playoff next summer combined with mid-level RL teams thast don't make the RL playoffs.
No promotion to RL based on performance since that is based on club overall performance (U13-U19). But then in 2027-2028, top teams woudl compete against each other in a "National" tier.
But the 'National' tier would still be below RL.
Yes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Level below ECNL RL (see link).
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSa4f_4kVmC/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=c6b88b7f-335c-4188-86ac-756c19f9e512
It's team based not club based, so top teams in each age group will make a playoff next summer combined with mid-level RL teams thast don't make the RL playoffs.
No promotion to RL based on performance since that is based on club overall performance (U13-U19). But then in 2027-2028, top teams woudl compete against each other in a "National" tier.
But the 'National' tier would still be below RL.
Anonymous wrote:Level below ECNL RL (see link).
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSa4f_4kVmC/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=c6b88b7f-335c-4188-86ac-756c19f9e512
It's team based not club based, so top teams in each age group will make a playoff next summer combined with mid-level RL teams thast don't make the RL playoffs.
No promotion to RL based on performance since that is based on club overall performance (U13-U19). But then in 2027-2028, top teams woudl compete against each other in a "National" tier.
Anonymous wrote:This will be a mess. There are clubs that have been stuck in no man’s land since EDP1 (USYS NL) fell apart because they didn’t have an MLS Next or ECNL badge. My son’s old club among them. They were definitely stronger than any RL team they played. Now teams like this will be forced to play below RL. The competition in that new league will be extremely lopsided if these independent clubs even stay in business. I think this will kill off his club. It’s a shame because it is a mid-sized club (3 teams an age group) with excellent coaching, a supportive atmosphere and lots of talented players who never wanted to move. But they won’t stick around for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's also going to be available to both ECNL and MSLN clubs - a common tier above the state level but below RL/AD.
Where did you see MLSN clubs would be participating? That's a completely separate eco system.
Anonymous wrote:That document uses the word pathway a lot. What is it a pathway to? If an N1 team beats RL teams in a tournament, don’t they have a pretty good case for being moved up into RL? But ECNL will say no because they aren’t in the right club? And the teams that they beat get to stay in? That seems like a bad look too. What is the incentive to be in N1? It’s ultimately a pathway to nowhere if you are at the top of it.
Anonymous wrote:That document uses the word pathway a lot. What is it a pathway to? If an N1 team beats RL teams in a tournament, don’t they have a pretty good case for being moved up into RL? But ECNL will say no because they aren’t in the right club? And the teams that they beat get to stay in? That seems like a bad look too. What is the incentive to be in N1? It’s ultimately a pathway to nowhere if you are at the top of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In Mid Atlantic, USYS NL is the top level of EDP starting at U13. Before this year, EDP started at Division 3 and Divisions 1 and 2 were administered separately as NL. This year they revamped it so ECP goes up to Regional League and the higher teams are still in NL.
There is relegation/promotion between EDP and NL.
9:06 here, I don't really understand the EDP league as our team has never played in it before, I just know our manager said we were in the top level and man some of the teams are really weak. I'm not sure if they were promoted there or can just sign themselves up for whatever level they choose.