Anonymous wrote:Alabama and Ole Miss should be up there along with Tennessee
Anonymous wrote:Alabama and Ole Miss should be up there along with Tennessee
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UC Merced is considered a top 20 public school by US News.
and yet we all know that it isn't
It’s 25 due to USNWR reliance on social mobility as a factor. 86-87% of Merced’s students are racial or ethnic minorities
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UC Merced is considered a top 20 public school by US News.
and yet we all know that it isn't
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UCB, UMICH, UVA, UNC, UT, UF, UCLA, W&M, UIUC, GT
W&M? Not per USNWR 2026
This is a good list. Though if you include Florida should probably also include Georgia.
USNWR has a particular methodology that works against W&M (like no longer valuing small class size). W&M definitely belongs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is enlightening because it is such a stark reminder of how incapable people here are of evaluating universities. OP asks a rather strange question but then the discussion immediately descends into whether standardized tests are required and ED practices. Nothing on professor or department quality, unique programming, career and grad school outcomes, or the like. Nope. Entirely focused on admissions practices.
Because student quality matters the most. A Nobel laureate cannot teach a lottery student who needs remedial math.
Anonymous wrote:UC Merced is considered a top 20 public school by US News.
Anonymous wrote:UC Merced is considered a top 20 public school by US News.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there really a rank? Aren't they all flagships which exist to educate predominantly the students of that state? When someone refers to a T10 public "ranking", is it for grad programs or for undergrad?
There are rankings. Five are in CA ….UCB, UCLA, UCSD, UCD and UCI. Are in the 1-9 spots.
Give me a huge break. UC schools are a total mess right now for undergraduate education. You can thank the Board of Regents for that. No school that is 100% test blind should be top anything. I know you are referring to the USNWR rankings, but do you realize they rely heavily on the social mobility score? This is why the UCs are in the top 10. They have more poor people and FGLI (Pell grant recipients) than most schools. Is that commendable? Yes, but it doesn’t make it a top public university. I say this as a proud graduate of the UC system. No way UCD or UCI belong in the top 10. Maybe UCSD?
I agree…I am in CA and I see some of these kids going to the UCs and I promise they are not Top 10 school material….