Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Your child should have been diligently pursuing a couple of interests outside of school since middle school. Colleges don't care what the activity is, they care about commitment, dedication, and reaching a high level of proficiency after years of effort. They're not interested in students who just sign up for a wide array of clubs in high school and then don't develop their interest in any other way.
When I mean years of effort, I'm talking about development in sports and music specifically. It takes so much time to be good at these things! You can win science competitions or develop great writing skills and be a yearbook editor with a couple of years of intense prep. But you can't plonk yourself down with a violin in 9th grade and expect to be musical, or be among the first at track without years of muscular exercise.
Ask your kid what they're interested in and orient them to pursuits they can realistically do in the short time they have.
My kid does play two sports at the varsity level and was selected at the district level for their instrument. I don't feel like that is sufficient.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only like 40 colleges care about ECs. It doesn’t sound like your kid is destined for one, so don’t get so worked up about it.
Rude! Feeling good about yourself now?
I honestly don’t think OP is somehow now trying to get her kid to do ECs to get into one of these schools…but thinks all colleges expect it.
Trying to clear up the misconception.
Op. 1. I'm not ruling my kid out for top 50 yet. 2. Is it really that only t50 care about ECs?! I find that hard to believe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Your child should have been diligently pursuing a couple of interests outside of school since middle school. Colleges don't care what the activity is, they care about commitment, dedication, and reaching a high level of proficiency after years of effort. They're not interested in students who just sign up for a wide array of clubs in high school and then don't develop their interest in any other way.
When I mean years of effort, I'm talking about development in sports and music specifically. It takes so much time to be good at these things! You can win science competitions or develop great writing skills and be a yearbook editor with a couple of years of intense prep. But you can't plonk yourself down with a violin in 9th grade and expect to be musical, or be among the first at track without years of muscular exercise.
Ask your kid what they're interested in and orient them to pursuits they can realistically do in the short time they have.
My kid does play two sports at the varsity level and was selected at the district level for their instrument. I don't feel like that is sufficient.
You’ve got to be kidding me. Those are good ECs. You made it sound like he had none. You sound intense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Your child should have been diligently pursuing a couple of interests outside of school since middle school. Colleges don't care what the activity is, they care about commitment, dedication, and reaching a high level of proficiency after years of effort. They're not interested in students who just sign up for a wide array of clubs in high school and then don't develop their interest in any other way.
When I mean years of effort, I'm talking about development in sports and music specifically. It takes so much time to be good at these things! You can win science competitions or develop great writing skills and be a yearbook editor with a couple of years of intense prep. But you can't plonk yourself down with a violin in 9th grade and expect to be musical, or be among the first at track without years of muscular exercise.
Ask your kid what they're interested in and orient them to pursuits they can realistically do in the short time they have.
My kid does play two sports at the varsity level and was selected at the district level for their instrument. I don't feel like that is sufficient.
Those ARE extra-curriculars. Why did you lie?
I didn't lie. I was hoping he would pursue more academic ECs. There are conflicting messages on all the boards about how sports are/are not valued. Most of dcum threads say sports don't count for anything. So I didn't count them. Music is done at school so I don't consider that EC.
Did you ask for activities "that counted"? No. You asked for activities, because supposedly your child was not persuaded that they mattered - even though he's doing them as we speak! Pants on fire, OP.
Whether or not you "count" an activity has less to do with what it is than how good your child is at that activity - don't you understand that?
Why are you all so nasty to people who are obviously new to all of this. "Don't you understand that?" is so obnoxious. No, that is not obvious to people who are new to the college application scene.
You're not new to the scene. You cite DCUM and have obviously read up on the subject. I do not appreciate that you deliberately misled us in your original post, OP. That's disrespectful.
Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Your child should have been diligently pursuing a couple of interests outside of school since middle school. Colleges don't care what the activity is, they care about commitment, dedication, and reaching a high level of proficiency after years of effort. They're not interested in students who just sign up for a wide array of clubs in high school and then don't develop their interest in any other way.
When I mean years of effort, I'm talking about development in sports and music specifically. It takes so much time to be good at these things! You can win science competitions or develop great writing skills and be a yearbook editor with a couple of years of intense prep. But you can't plonk yourself down with a violin in 9th grade and expect to be musical, or be among the first at track without years of muscular exercise.
Ask your kid what they're interested in and orient them to pursuits they can realistically do in the short time they have.
My kid does play two sports at the varsity level and was selected at the district level for their instrument. I don't feel like that is sufficient.
You’ve got to be kidding me. Those are good ECs. You made it sound like he had none. You sound intense.
Agree, I fell for it too and thought the OP had no EC'S. An instrument and sport is just fine for most of the T30 and flagships such as UVA, Michigan. The only schools that want deep, impactful EC's on top of that are T20/ivy types. Your kid 100% will not fit in at those from what you wrote. Almost all who are there did not need to be told to find something to care about and make a difference. You underestimate today's highest achieving high schoolers if you think moms and dads pushed most of them. Most who get in (unhooked) have highly tuned motivation and discipline from a young age, well beyond the average high school graduate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Your child should have been diligently pursuing a couple of interests outside of school since middle school. Colleges don't care what the activity is, they care about commitment, dedication, and reaching a high level of proficiency after years of effort. They're not interested in students who just sign up for a wide array of clubs in high school and then don't develop their interest in any other way.
When I mean years of effort, I'm talking about development in sports and music specifically. It takes so much time to be good at these things! You can win science competitions or develop great writing skills and be a yearbook editor with a couple of years of intense prep. But you can't plonk yourself down with a violin in 9th grade and expect to be musical, or be among the first at track without years of muscular exercise.
Ask your kid what they're interested in and orient them to pursuits they can realistically do in the short time they have.
My kid does play two sports at the varsity level and was selected at the district level for their instrument. I don't feel like that is sufficient.
You’ve got to be kidding me. Those are good ECs. You made it sound like he had none. You sound intense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Your child should have been diligently pursuing a couple of interests outside of school since middle school. Colleges don't care what the activity is, they care about commitment, dedication, and reaching a high level of proficiency after years of effort. They're not interested in students who just sign up for a wide array of clubs in high school and then don't develop their interest in any other way.
When I mean years of effort, I'm talking about development in sports and music specifically. It takes so much time to be good at these things! You can win science competitions or develop great writing skills and be a yearbook editor with a couple of years of intense prep. But you can't plonk yourself down with a violin in 9th grade and expect to be musical, or be among the first at track without years of muscular exercise.
Ask your kid what they're interested in and orient them to pursuits they can realistically do in the short time they have.
My kid does play two sports at the varsity level and was selected at the district level for their instrument. I don't feel like that is sufficient.
Those ARE extra-curriculars. Why did you lie?
I didn't lie. I was hoping he would pursue more academic ECs. There are conflicting messages on all the boards about how sports are/are not valued. Most of dcum threads say sports don't count for anything. So I didn't count them. Music is done at school so I don't consider that EC.
Did you ask for activities "that counted"? No. You asked for activities, because supposedly your child was not persuaded that they mattered - even though he's doing them as we speak! Pants on fire, OP.
Whether or not you "count" an activity has less to do with what it is than how good your child is at that activity - don't you understand that?
Why are you all so nasty to people who are obviously new to all of this. "Don't you understand that?" is so obnoxious. No, that is not obvious to people who are new to the college application scene.
You're not new to the scene. You cite DCUM and have obviously read up on the subject. I do not appreciate that you deliberately misled us in your original post, OP. That's disrespectful.
Op. I did not write the above, but where did I say he did no ECs?
Anonymous wrote:Only like 40 colleges care about ECs. It doesn’t sound like your kid is destined for one, so don’t get so worked up about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er... unless you're the particularly forward-thinking parent of an elementary schooler, your question makes me think it's already too late for your kid, OP.
Your child should have been diligently pursuing a couple of interests outside of school since middle school. Colleges don't care what the activity is, they care about commitment, dedication, and reaching a high level of proficiency after years of effort. They're not interested in students who just sign up for a wide array of clubs in high school and then don't develop their interest in any other way.
When I mean years of effort, I'm talking about development in sports and music specifically. It takes so much time to be good at these things! You can win science competitions or develop great writing skills and be a yearbook editor with a couple of years of intense prep. But you can't plonk yourself down with a violin in 9th grade and expect to be musical, or be among the first at track without years of muscular exercise.
Ask your kid what they're interested in and orient them to pursuits they can realistically do in the short time they have.
My kid does play two sports at the varsity level and was selected at the district level for their instrument. I don't feel like that is sufficient.
Those ARE extra-curriculars. Why did you lie?
I didn't lie. I was hoping he would pursue more academic ECs. There are conflicting messages on all the boards about how sports are/are not valued. Most of dcum threads say sports don't count for anything. So I didn't count them. Music is done at school so I don't consider that EC.
Did you ask for activities "that counted"? No. You asked for activities, because supposedly your child was not persuaded that they mattered - even though he's doing them as we speak! Pants on fire, OP.
Whether or not you "count" an activity has less to do with what it is than how good your child is at that activity - don't you understand that?
Why are you all so nasty to people who are obviously new to all of this. "Don't you understand that?" is so obnoxious. No, that is not obvious to people who are new to the college application scene.
You're not new to the scene. You cite DCUM and have obviously read up on the subject. I do not appreciate that you deliberately misled us in your original post, OP. That's disrespectful.