Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, normal smart kids are getting into Ivy and T30, even from our public. We're not in a district where families game the system - kids are doing their sports and their ECs and enjoying their high school lives. The Ivy and Stanford kids are great students + interesting kids.
Tell this to superstar kids having max scores and national awards that did not get accepted to any ivy league schools but to top stem schools. Ivy schools have a questionable admission process that favors legacies and private school kids. Obviously, there are exceptions but not many.
Cornell still takes smart kids from the burbs. And Princeton will take them for STEM. But otherwise, the Ivies generally don't for the unhooked. My personal feeling is that Ivy admission priorities are dumb and are killing their brand. But, whatever. Their choice to conduct admissions as they do.
But strong students still have a shot at MIT, Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Stanford, Notre Dame, Rice, Duke, Carnegie Mellon, Berkeley, USC, Chicago, Michigan, Johns Hopkins, Georgetown, Georgia Tech, Emory and a lot of other very good schools. That's generally where the talent is these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a junior who has straight As, highest rigor, 1500+ SAT, 2 varsity sports that he should be captain senior year, summer internships, academic clubs and competitions but no national or international recognition in anything.
He is such a hard working kid. I thought a 1500 would be good enough but he is trying to get 1550 on his SAT. Not sure how big of a difference 1510 or 1550 is.
I have seen some superstar kids get rejected from all the top schools and making me nervous.
Sorry for being very direct and maybe harsh: all unhooked well rounded kid from public schools have about 0.1% chances to get into famous schools like Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Stanford.
You should be sorry for being inaccurate. Every year our run-of-the-mill public high school of 2000+ students in a Dallas-Fort Worth suburb has 2-3 unhooked well-rounded kids going to HYPS and 3-5 to the rest of the Ivies/t15. Your "0.1%" is a gross exaggeration and is meaningless without context anyway. And your "public schools are trash" bias is showing.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is similar…but add in some volunteering. My kid got into two T20 and two WASP. Did not apply to any Ivys. We are full pay, so I’m sure that helped.
I’d say the thing to do now is create a story—show things he’s done to support his interests. Helps if he’s done things supporting what he thinks he’s going to major in and/or a big passion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, normal smart kids are getting into Ivy and T30, even from our public. We're not in a district where families game the system - kids are doing their sports and their ECs and enjoying their high school lives. The Ivy and Stanford kids are great students + interesting kids.
Tell this to superstar kids having max scores and national awards that did not get accepted to any ivy league schools but to top stem schools. Ivy schools have a questionable admission process that favors legacies and private school kids. Obviously, there are exceptions but not many.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a junior who has straight As, highest rigor, 1500+ SAT, 2 varsity sports that he should be captain senior year, summer internships, academic clubs and competitions but no national or international recognition in anything.
He is such a hard working kid. I thought a 1500 would be good enough but he is trying to get 1550 on his SAT. Not sure how big of a difference 1510 or 1550 is.
I have seen some superstar kids get rejected from all the top schools and making me nervous.
Sorry for being very direct and maybe harsh: all unhooked well rounded kid from public schools have about 0.1% chances to get into famous schools like Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Stanford.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, normal smart kids are getting into Ivy and T30, even from our public. We're not in a district where families game the system - kids are doing their sports and their ECs and enjoying their high school lives. The Ivy and Stanford kids are great students + interesting kids.
Anonymous wrote:I have a junior who has straight As, highest rigor, 1500+ SAT, 2 varsity sports that he should be captain senior year, summer internships, academic clubs and competitions but no national or international recognition in anything.
He is such a hard working kid. I thought a 1500 would be good enough but he is trying to get 1550 on his SAT. Not sure how big of a difference 1510 or 1550 is.
I have seen some superstar kids get rejected from all the top schools and making me nervous.
Anonymous wrote:I have a junior who has straight As, highest rigor, 1500+ SAT, 2 varsity sports that he should be captain senior year, summer internships, academic clubs and competitions but no national or international recognition in anything.
He is such a hard working kid. I thought a 1500 would be good enough but he is trying to get 1550 on his SAT. Not sure how big of a difference 1510 or 1550 is.
I have seen some superstar kids get rejected from all the top schools and making me nervous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This. I don't know why people keep thinking that there is a distinction between 1500 and 1550. The Harvard lawsuit explained that a 1500+ got the same as a 1600. Getting rejected with a 1500 will not be the reason for the rejection...Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a junior who has straight As, highest rigor, 1500+ SAT, 2 varsity sports that he should be captain senior year, summer internships, academic clubs and competitions but no national or international recognition in anything.
He is such a hard working kid. I thought a 1500 would be good enough but he is trying to get 1550 on his SAT. Not sure how big of a difference 1510 or 1550 is.
I have seen some superstar kids get rejected from all the top schools and making me nervous.
My nephew got into Yale (REA) and Harvard (RD) with a 1520. He had a very high (perfect) GPA and took most rigorous curriculum. I really don't think the SAT score going up 20 points here or there mattered. I think once you hit 1500, you clear a bar and it's about the rest of your application - GPA, recommendations, EC/activities, major, jobs, essay, full pay, etc.
I would put the additional energy into the rest of your son's profile, OP rather than wasting time trying to improve the SAT once you've already reached the 99th percentile.
I’ve heard the cutoff occurs at 1520/1530/1540, depending on the source.
The cutoff is actually much lower to get your application read. Sometimes 1440.
The test score won't make your application - plenty of perfect test scores and 4.0uw aren't even waitlisted.
Now, having a higher test score can help bolster the case of a STEM candidate, but I know of a test-optional humanities applicant admitted to Northwestern this year in RD (private HS).
There is no clear line in the sand.
That cutoff I mentioned was the score below which AOs in top Ivies would think your SAT score is low!
It's all about context and peer group. Look at your high school's college counseling profile - it will list the average.
From West Virginia, a 1400 would be considered amazing to Yale (and they have explicitly mentioned it on their podcast). Always, it's about high school context.