Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My office is part time and hiring. We are getting a lot of overqualified people who were RIF'd from much higher, full time positions. So yes, people are desperate for anything.
Or they want part time? I'm a fed and would LOVE to be part time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how many agencies are hiring lately and apparently have gotten applicants. How is that possible after the year of abuse — RIFs, doge, cancellation of TW and CBAs, low or zero pay raises, 5 bullets, criticism and insults, etc etc.
If any private company did something like that, they’d never get away with it — nobody would apply to work there for a long time. So how does the federal government get away with it?
Because, look around, people are desperate to work!
I do look around. All I see our McMansions and fancy private schools and cars abd restaurants. Doesn’t seem very desperate to me. Maybe some people like abuse. Daddy issues?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amazing how many agencies are hiring lately and apparently have gotten applicants. How is that possible after the year of abuse — RIFs, doge, cancellation of TW and CBAs, low or zero pay raises, 5 bullets, criticism and insults, etc etc.
If any private company did something like that, they’d never get away with it — nobody would apply to work there for a long time. So how does the federal government get away with it?
Because, look around, people are desperate to work!
Anonymous wrote:Amazing how many agencies are hiring lately and apparently have gotten applicants. How is that possible after the year of abuse — RIFs, doge, cancellation of TW and CBAs, low or zero pay raises, 5 bullets, criticism and insults, etc etc.
If any private company did something like that, they’d never get away with it — nobody would apply to work there for a long time. So how does the federal government get away with it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are many “boomerangs” at Meta and Amazon and other companies who are known for continually laying people off. I work in tech and got laid off recently, and I'm now in another job where it may happen again because that is the culture in these companies. I guess the main difference here is that until last year the government was not known for that. But I wouldn’t be surprised if many former employees reapplied because if they liked their jobs before and they have unique skills suited to these roles, it makes sense for them to put the hurt aside and go back to it.
I left and what's keeping me away isn't that they hurt me, it's that most of the reasons I left still apply. It's still a bad place to work.
Not every role has a good private equivalent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are many “boomerangs” at Meta and Amazon and other companies who are known for continually laying people off. I work in tech and got laid off recently, and I'm now in another job where it may happen again because that is the culture in these companies. I guess the main difference here is that until last year the government was not known for that. But I wouldn’t be surprised if many former employees reapplied because if they liked their jobs before and they have unique skills suited to these roles, it makes sense for them to put the hurt aside and go back to it.
I left and what's keeping me away isn't that they hurt me, it's that most of the reasons I left still apply. It's still a bad place to work.
Anonymous wrote:Shame on you. Many jobs in the federal government are highly specific to their agencies and departments and do not exist anywhere else. The people who were laid off probably had difficulty finding work that matches their specific skillset. Of course they're going to try to return. Now DOGE has disappeared, job security is a little more guaranteed. And most agencies are apolitical.
A lot of friends who were laid off are re-applying.
Anonymous wrote:There are many “boomerangs” at Meta and Amazon and other companies who are known for continually laying people off. I work in tech and got laid off recently, and I'm now in another job where it may happen again because that is the culture in these companies. I guess the main difference here is that until last year the government was not known for that. But I wouldn’t be surprised if many former employees reapplied because if they liked their jobs before and they have unique skills suited to these roles, it makes sense for them to put the hurt aside and go back to it.
Anonymous wrote:My office is part time and hiring. We are getting a lot of overqualified people who were RIF'd from much higher, full time positions. So yes, people are desperate for anything.
Anonymous wrote:Folks are playing the long game. A federal career is still a good investment, and in a few years, things will change considerably. I'm a fed and miserable - but this to shall pass. I'm can't retire, and I'm not going to throw it all away. I can survive for two more years. I can totally see why someone would apply with the same perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Amazing how many agencies are hiring lately and apparently have gotten applicants. How is that possible after the year of abuse — RIFs, doge, cancellation of TW and CBAs, low or zero pay raises, 5 bullets, criticism and insults, etc etc.
If any private company did something like that, they’d never get away with it — nobody would apply to work there for a long time. So how does the federal government get away with it?