Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess in the Epstein era it makes sense that people want to celebrate another pedophile. SMH
As the kids say it’s not that deep. I don’t know where you’re pulling “celebrating” from. Odd choice of words. It’s a movie. Fantasy. Entertainment.
Anonymous wrote:I guess in the Epstein era it makes sense that people want to celebrate another pedophile. SMH
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reviews are hysterical - it is supposed to be awful.
It’s actually supposed to be fantastic. But what reviewer is going to say that?? Are you kidding. No one is going to publish a fawning movie about an accused pedophile.
It has the sheen of a generic biopic. What about it screams "fantastic" to you? lol
Admittedly I haven’t seen it but I curious as to how they explained testifying under oath on MJs behalf and waiting four years after his acquittal and an additional ten years after his death to create the doc? And why then follow up with a 400M lawsuit?Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe people are still denying that MJ sexually abused children. Did you see Leaving Neverland? It was incredibly powerful and really just made it impossible to deny what happened to those poor men. Yes he made great music, and go ahead and listen to it if you want, but it's just cruel and delusional to pretend like what happened to them didn't happen.
Of course, you can't see Leaving Neverland now b/c the Jackson estate sued HBO and made them take it down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Michael Jackson is the ultimate (contemporary) conflict of values for me:
- he was accused of and probably did some very messed up stuff
- I love his music!
And to learn that the movie brushes over the scandalous parts of his story… I don’t know if this is right.
(Actually, Bill Cosby is worse and therefore sadly I cannot support him by watching his shows anymore.)
+1. It’s not right but typical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No interest in seeing a movie about a drug addict pedo.
Culkin and other celeb kids say he never acted inappropriately. After all, they don’t need his money.
Or, you know, predators know not to go after high profile targets who can ruin them.
Honestly!!! People are so naive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No interest in seeing a movie about a drug addict pedo.
Culkin and other celeb kids say he never acted inappropriately. After all, they don’t need his money.
Or, you know, predators know not to go after high profile targets who can ruin them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think he was just odd (who isn't when growing up from such a young age and at the mercy of being a money making machine for adults) and while he might have been obsessed with hanging out with kids, I don't believe he did se*ually inappropriate things. But maybe that's just me not wanting to believe. But being odd and not well-adjusted is different from being a pedo.
I agree with this.
Anonymous wrote:I think he was just odd (who isn't when growing up from such a young age and at the mercy of being a money making machine for adults) and while he might have been obsessed with hanging out with kids, I don't believe he did se*ually inappropriate things. But maybe that's just me not wanting to believe. But being odd and not well-adjusted is different from being a pedo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reviews are hysterical - it is supposed to be awful.
Which reviews are you looking at? On Rotten Tomatoes it currently has 39% favorable reviews from critics and 95% favorable audience reviews. People are raving about the music and Jaafar Jackson's portrayal of his uncle. Not surprising that the critics are out of touch with what people actually like.
Most people have terrible taste, so this isn't the serve you think!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No interest in seeing a movie about a drug addict pedo.
Culkin and other celeb kids say he never acted inappropriately. After all, they don’t need his money.
Or, you know, predators know not to go after high profile targets who can ruin them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reviews are hysterical - it is supposed to be awful.
Which reviews are you looking at? On Rotten Tomatoes it currently has 39% favorable reviews from critics and 95% favorable audience reviews. People are raving about the music and Jaafar Jackson's portrayal of his uncle. Not surprising that the critics are out of touch with what people actually like.