Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A friend just post that 4 people (2 men, 2 women) are welcoming a baby. One of women is carrying the baby and the babies last name is man1-man2.
I'm like...what? I don't understand...
A few years ago she posted that her and the two guys bought a house together but no mention of the other girl.
Any thoughts on what that's all about?
Unconventional and unhealthy dynamics but whatever people need to survive. There is undoubtedly a leader in this small cult and rest are lost souls.
+100. My bet is the non-carrier woman will be the first one to snap out of it and escape the Manson family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A friend just post that 4 people (2 men, 2 women) are welcoming a baby. One of women is carrying the baby and the babies last name is man1-man2.
I'm like...what? I don't understand...
A few years ago she posted that her and the two guys bought a house together but no mention of the other girl.
Any thoughts on what that's all about?
Unconventional and unhealthy dynamics but whatever people need to survive. There is undoubtedly a leader in this small cult and rest are lost souls.
Anonymous wrote:The more people welcome a baby, the better, OP. Who cares about who loves who? They support each other, that's clear. It's heart-warming to see. Your job is to express congratulations, wish the birthing mother a swift recovery, and send a baby gift if you're close to these 4 people.
Anonymous wrote:I think the part that seems hard to understand is at least 2 people have no genetic or legal ties to the child. So is it fair to have everyone pitching in? Is it truly equal?
Anonymous wrote:A friend just post that 4 people (2 men, 2 women) are welcoming a baby. One of women is carrying the baby and the babies last name is man1-man2.
I'm like...what? I don't understand...
A few years ago she posted that her and the two guys bought a house together but no mention of the other girl.
Any thoughts on what that's all about?