Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An LSAT score is the most important factor in law school admissions, although GPA is important, too. Once your child takes the LSAT you’ll have a better sense of things.
Eh… not sure this is the case. You are saying one test has more sway than 4 years of grades? That makes zero sense.
Yes, LSAT is more important than grades. LSAT is the best predictor of success in law school, and law school grades are the best predictor of success on the bar.
OP -- many people on this thread do not know what they are talking about. If your kid's degree is in ME/EE and they can write and communicate well, they will have very good job prospects as long as they do well in law school. It doesn't have to be at a top law school either. There's a market for people like this in the patent world. But your kid should understand that patent law (which is just one area of IP) isn't the only place a tech background can be useful for lawyers. Law & tech is a huge field with many possibilities.
Have you been paying attention to law school admissions this year?
Yes, job prospects will be great but getting into the schools of choice/and or financial aid from the schools is the bigger issue. My KJD dc has a 3.8 and 170s LSAT and is waitlisted everywhere. He is not alone. Work experience will definitely counter this.
Would be patent lawyers don't need T14 or bust, so it's a lot easier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I totally agree that attending a T14 isn’t a necessity. More than 90% of practicing lawyers didn’t go to a T14. If it helps I got into a T14 off the WL. Law schools have relatively small classes and may need to use WLs fairly extensively to manage enrollments.
Is what you did in the past applicable to today's job market?
Yes. Nothing’s changed from what’s said above.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An LSAT score is the most important factor in law school admissions, although GPA is important, too. Once your child takes the LSAT you’ll have a better sense of things.
Eh… not sure this is the case. You are saying one test has more sway than 4 years of grades? That makes zero sense.
Yes, LSAT is more important than grades. LSAT is the best predictor of success in law school, and law school grades are the best predictor of success on the bar.
OP -- many people on this thread do not know what they are talking about. If your kid's degree is in ME/EE and they can write and communicate well, they will have very good job prospects as long as they do well in law school. It doesn't have to be at a top law school either. There's a market for people like this in the patent world. But your kid should understand that patent law (which is just one area of IP) isn't the only place a tech background can be useful for lawyers. Law & tech is a huge field with many possibilities.
Have you been paying attention to law school admissions this year?
Yes, job prospects will be great but getting into the schools of choice/and or financial aid from the schools is the bigger issue. My KJD dc has a 3.8 and 170s LSAT and is waitlisted everywhere. He is not alone. Work experience will definitely counter this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I totally agree that attending a T14 isn’t a necessity. More than 90% of practicing lawyers didn’t go to a T14. If it helps I got into a T14 off the WL. Law schools have relatively small classes and may need to use WLs fairly extensively to manage enrollments.
Is what you did in the past applicable to today's job market?
Anonymous wrote:I totally agree that attending a T14 isn’t a necessity. More than 90% of practicing lawyers didn’t go to a T14. If it helps I got into a T14 off the WL. Law schools have relatively small classes and may need to use WLs fairly extensively to manage enrollments.
Anonymous wrote:I totally agree that attending a T14 isn’t a necessity. More than 90% of practicing lawyers didn’t go to a T14. If it helps I got into a T14 off the WL. Law schools have relatively small classes and may need to use WLs fairly extensively to manage enrollments.
It's all about US News Rankings. That's the whole reason.Anonymous wrote:I think that law schools focus so much on LSAT scores because of ratings and public perceptions. When applicants think about the quality of schools, median LSAT scores are a big factor IMO. Nothing is easier to point to than high median LSAT scores. To a lesser degree the same thing goes on with undergraduate schools and SAT scores. Stupid but true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An LSAT score is the most important factor in law school admissions, although GPA is important, too. Once your child takes the LSAT you’ll have a better sense of things.
Eh… not sure this is the case. You are saying one test has more sway than 4 years of grades? That makes zero sense.
Yes, LSAT is more important than grades. LSAT is the best predictor of success in law school, and law school grades are the best predictor of success on the bar.
OP -- many people on this thread do not know what they are talking about. If your kid's degree is in ME/EE and they can write and communicate well, they will have very good job prospects as long as they do well in law school. It doesn't have to be at a top law school either. There's a market for people like this in the patent world. But your kid should understand that patent law (which is just one area of IP) isn't the only place a tech background can be useful for lawyers. Law & tech is a huge field with many possibilities. [/quote
]
Except it’s not. I had a mediocre LSAT an finished 7th in my class of 250. Law school just made sense to me in a way nothing else ever had. I just got it. I have since successfully passed the bar in more than one state (and in a “hard” state). Personally, I think extreme focus on lsat is stupid but I get it. They need something standard and grades are subjective and heavily inflated these days.