Anonymous wrote:There are no design rules for websites! That's the beauty of websites. ADA rules are fine but this website fits not violate them. There is a program you can run to determine this or you can request an evaluation. This site is fine.
I have tried both on my phone and my computer and the website is easy to read and navigable. I think you just don't like change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So scanning the website for ADA compliance, it fails all over. Which means it could be sued for not meeting the law. It actually has a tremendous number of flaws so if anyone wants to litigate you could make some great money.
This site now violates so many of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards to ensure compliance.
This tells me this was not a true web designer that they hired.
It actually doesn't fail any of the compliance directives. You may THINK it does with your "calibrated eye" but it does not.
Anonymous wrote:There are no design rules for websites! That's the beauty of websites. ADA rules are fine but this website fits not violate them. There is a program you can run to determine this or you can request an evaluation. This site is fine.
I have tried both on my phone and my computer and the website is easy to read and navigable. I think you just don't like change.
Anonymous wrote:It's using iframes which aren't mobile friendly. - Professional website designer
Anonymous wrote:
So scanning the website for ADA compliance, it fails all over. Which means it could be sued for not meeting the law. It actually has a tremendous number of flaws so if anyone wants to litigate you could make some great money.
This site now violates so many of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards to ensure compliance.
This tells me this was not a true web designer that they hired.
Anonymous wrote:
Link?
Anonymous wrote:So the new site is pretty bad and violates a number of design principles. Anyone know why? What is the story?
It is impossible to find anything on the site now which was always the strength of PVS before. It has the feel of a cheap scam site now.
Anonymous wrote:So the new site is pretty bad and violates a number of design principles. Anyone know why? What is the story?
It is impossible to find anything on the site now which was always the strength of PVS before. It has the feel of a cheap scam site now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So scanning the website for ADA compliance, it fails all over. Which means it could be sued for not meeting the law. It actually has a tremendous number of flaws so if anyone wants to litigate you could make some great money.
This site now violates so many of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards to ensure compliance.
This tells me this was not a true web designer that they hired.
In this environment???? good luck with that.
Anonymous wrote:
So scanning the website for ADA compliance, it fails all over. Which means it could be sued for not meeting the law. It actually has a tremendous number of flaws so if anyone wants to litigate you could make some great money.
This site now violates so many of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards to ensure compliance.
This tells me this was not a true web designer that they hired.
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The web version if pretty hard on the eyes. I don't think it was designed by a true web designer since it violates some basic principles of design. I assume that the web developer is not a professional if they are just a swim parent with a full time job and doing this as gig work.
PVS probably lacks the money to hire a real web developer, which is unfortunate. They should have realized that the site they designed is not mobile friendly and since the majority of users access the site on their phone it is very short sighted.
They would do better to spend the extra money and hire a professional.
The site not unit violates design principles, it may not be ADA Compliant either.
The site not *only violates design principles, it may not be ADA Compliant either
Not an expert, please explain the ADA compliant comment?
Anonymous wrote:The real question is: Why did they need to change the site at all? It was linear and easy to use before, along with meeting universal design principles and being ADA Compliant.