Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This market is going to seem a meaningful correction soon. At some point, the math has to work.
What makes you think "the math" doesn't "work"? You finding it shocking or wrong that homes are this expensive in this area doesn't mean anything. Willing buyer/willing seller. Sometimes I think this forum is full of people who still have the 1985 purchasing power of 1M in their heads, who can't accept that 1M isn't what it used to be.
The gap between the income level and pricing level has gotten far too wide. Ultimately, the buy universe gets thinner and thinner and eventually you get a reversion to the mean with a bunch of late buyers caught in the “prices only go up euphoria” holding the bag. Very similar to the dynamics you often see at the tail end of an overbought financial market. At the end of the day, just my humble opinion — I had this same opinion back in late 2006 / early 2007. Time will tell if I’m right or wrong…
I think there are too many rich lawyers, plus people whose stock investments have done well. We'll need biglaw layoffs plus a stock market correction. The stock market correction may have begun, which means that the layoffs may not be far behind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This market is going to seem a meaningful correction soon. At some point, the math has to work.
What makes you think "the math" doesn't "work"? You finding it shocking or wrong that homes are this expensive in this area doesn't mean anything. Willing buyer/willing seller. Sometimes I think this forum is full of people who still have the 1985 purchasing power of 1M in their heads, who can't accept that 1M isn't what it used to be.
The gap between the income level and pricing level has gotten far too wide. Ultimately, the buy universe gets thinner and thinner and eventually you get a reversion to the mean with a bunch of late buyers caught in the “prices only go up euphoria” holding the bag. Very similar to the dynamics you often see at the tail end of an overbought financial market. At the end of the day, just my humble opinion — I had this same opinion back in late 2006 / early 2007. Time will tell if I’m right or wrong…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This market is going to seem a meaningful correction soon. At some point, the math has to work.
What makes you think "the math" doesn't "work"? You finding it shocking or wrong that homes are this expensive in this area doesn't mean anything. Willing buyer/willing seller. Sometimes I think this forum is full of people who still have the 1985 purchasing power of 1M in their heads, who can't accept that 1M isn't what it used to be.
Anonymous wrote:This market is going to seem a meaningful correction soon. At some point, the math has to work.
Anonymous wrote:The Walton's house (really Hamner house) in Schuyler was more architecturally cohesive than the one in the URL. More livable floor plan, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is one of the better ones. Come to Arlington and see what we’re building here and you’ll come to appreciate moco and NW DC new builds more.
The "best" parts of Arlington are probably more expensive per SF than MoCo and some of NWDC. I agree, the quality isn't there, but people are paying for location and the schools. It is what it is. I'll move somewhere else for ambiance eventually.
Untrue. Just go into Zillow and compare the most expensive houses in Bethesda vs the most expensive in N Arlington. Bethesda is more expensive at the high end, even if you do the "per SF" calculation. I like N Arlington, but I think Bethesda is nicer and more established.
As for the house OP posted, it is really nice and well done. Check out the thread on Stephen Miller's house if you want to see something that is truly hideous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure OP is just jealous bc he lives in some Home Alone wannabe 90s style tacky all brick dump in Fort Hunt, barely scraping by on his “vp of government affairs” salary at some obsolete trade group
Oh, I would love that Home Alone house and would take it any day over this house. This new style is going to be so dated soon, whereas the Home Alone House is a classic style that is never off trend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure OP is just jealous bc he lives in some Home Alone wannabe 90s style tacky all brick dump in Fort Hunt, barely scraping by on his “vp of government affairs” salary at some obsolete trade group
Oh, I would love that Home Alone house and would take it any day over this house. This new style is going to be so dated soon, whereas the Home Alone House is a classic style that is never off trend.