Anonymous wrote:l don’t understand your statement about the worst situation. Don’t retirees 65+ regardless of income get Medicare? If someone chooses to retire early they didn’t “work all their life” - why do you feel bad for them?Anonymous wrote:I know many immigrants who came to the U.S. later in life to be with their adult kids.
They have section 8, SSI and Medicaid. Their adult kids help them with food and other essentials. They manage to save part of their SSI and their kids usually inherit a bunch of cash.
The worst situation is when someone works all their life and gets SS that is too high for Medicaid and other benefits but not enough to get by. I feel bad for Americans who are in this predicament.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everytime I look up what I should have saved up, I get stats on what the average American actually has. And they don’t have much. So what do all these people actually do when they reach their 60s and 70s?
My mom lives on her SS. I know posters will say that's impossible but it isn't. Her house was paid off shortly before she retired. She owes about $5-6k in property taxes on it. She has fairly low expenses since it's just her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will be working until I die. I can't afford to retire. That's for rich people.
Actually, rich people don’t retire, they keep working. People who dream about retirement are poor people with bad jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everytime I look up what I should have saved up, I get stats on what the average American actually has. And they don’t have much. So what do all these people actually do when they reach their 60s and 70s?
They work. I know several 70 year olds that are working jobs.
I’ll probably work until 70. I would like to retire from my “real” job in 5 years, collect small pension and work a part time easier job and hold off on SS until 67.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everytime I look up what I should have saved up, I get stats on what the average American actually has. And they don’t have much. So what do all these people actually do when they reach their 60s and 70s?
They work. I know several 70 year olds that are working jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The one flaw is the average 401k balance theory is people like me to lazy to roll them over. I have seven 401ks and a 457b. I actually rolled four of them. If I did not I would have had 11 401ks.
So if you look at some you say holy shit tgis dude is near retirement and only has 15k.
They need to find a way to consolidate 401ks, IRAs, pensions, 457b by person
I’m guilty of this. I have 401ks strewed across the landscape. I know it’s not wise. It looks like I have little money but I have about 2 million by myself. Not including DH.
Anonymous wrote:The one flaw is the average 401k balance theory is people like me to lazy to roll them over. I have seven 401ks and a 457b. I actually rolled four of them. If I did not I would have had 11 401ks.
So if you look at some you say holy shit tgis dude is near retirement and only has 15k.
They need to find a way to consolidate 401ks, IRAs, pensions, 457b by person
Anonymous wrote:Everytime I look up what I should have saved up, I get stats on what the average American actually has. And they don’t have much. So what do all these people actually do when they reach their 60s and 70s?
Anonymous wrote:Everytime I look up what I should have saved up, I get stats on what the average American actually has. And they don’t have much. So what do all these people actually do when they reach their 60s and 70s?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will be working until I die. I can't afford to retire. That's for rich people.
Actually, rich people don’t retire, they keep working. People who dream about retirement are poor people with bad jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those stats might not be accurate. Average 401k balance doesn’t mean total net worth.
I have a Roth IRA with only $7000 in it and another IRA with 60k. One of my 401k’s has 120k. Total net worth is in the millions.
But why didn't you take advantage of tax free growth for years?
I only directly contributed $2k to my Roth when I was in my mid 20’s and low earning. As soon as I became high earning I’m no longer eligible. I currently do a mega backdoor Roth 401k and contribute 20k a year into that. I could do a normal backdoor conversion to my IRA but I’m too lazy.
So why didn't you do a Roth until you got over the $160K+ and why didn't you do a reg Ira after taxes once Roth wasn't available. I too have a "small Roth" of $40k because it was only a few years i could contribute but I have a $400k+ Ira that is solely from Ira (not any rollover 401k --have about $500k for that and I haven't worked in 25 years (not yet 60)
But I get tax free growth for years by doing so
Income climbed quickly and I couldn’t really spare the few thousand a year back then
Ok, but why no regular Ira? It still grows tax free