Anonymous[b wrote:]I think there may be some cultural issues at play here. Are you not White OP? Are you wealthy? I ask this because I have known a few women like this who were wealthy and either Persian or Arab ( I know MANY more women of those ethnicities who are very career minded). [/b]They married partners of the same ethnicity so I think it was understood/ accepted. But still very risky! I think if she and her fiancée have decided that she will definitely support his career and raise the kids, this arrangement kind of makes sense (still risky!). Honestly it is probably less prone to strife than so many other marriages I know where the woman becomes the default caregiver (and either is forced out of the workforce or super stressed by the balancing act) because the dad won’t step up or step back in his career. But this has obvious risks and is not an arrangement I would want for my child. Being entirely financially dependent on a man is not good. How will she have the strength to leave if the marriage is bad? Then again, if you’re wealthy, that might not be an issue.
Anonymous wrote:She’s not working right now, but she does stay busy. She has a lot of hobbies and interests she’s really engaged in, and she’s involved in community volunteering and local events. She’s definitely not just sitting around—she just hasn’t pursued a traditional job path, which is where my concern about long-term independence comes in. -OP
Anonymous wrote:She must be very pretty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is ridiculous. Everyone - even if they marry a billionaire - should be prepared to support themselves, even if they never have to.
Well, that's not true. If she marries a billionaire, she can continue her hobbies social and charitable activities without having to find a career if she prefers that.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. How does she support her lifestyle? Does she pay rent??