Anonymous wrote:People made an assumption about him due to the image he projects. Just because you have curly hair, a French name, and show up in artsy films does not mean that you are deep or intellectual individual, people just assumed he was. He probably is kind of just bro-y which is fine but I think people had a different concept of him.

Great take. If Jake Paul had made the same comment, no one would have cared or taken notice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He just said what most people are thinking.

Not only that but I see it more as a warning of where film is headed (or is already there, to some extent— just look at how many films lost money in the box office).

People seemed to miss the point entirely.

The writing has been on the wall for a while.

Anonymous wrote:He just said what most people are thinking.

Not only that but I see it more as a warning of where film is headed (or is already there, to some extent— just look at how many films lost money in the box office).

People seemed to miss the point entirely.

This is a publicity stunt and it is working. Look at all the press he’s getting. Next he’ll redeem himself by enrolling in a ballet class at ABT and doing a Netflix show about it.

Anonymous wrote:People made an assumption about him due to the image he projects. Just because you have curly hair, a French name, and show up in artsy films does not mean that you are deep or intellectual individual, people just assumed he was. He probably is kind of just bro-y which is fine but I think people had a different concept of him.

Good analysis. If he was deep or intellectual, he would probably have different taste in women.

People made an assumption about him due to the image he projects. Just because you have curly hair, a French name, and show up in artsy films does not mean that you are deep or intellectual individual, people just assumed he was. He probably is kind of just bro-y which is fine but I think people had a different concept of him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His choice of partner is problematic and indicative of a lack of taste, depth and values. So, I'm not surprised.

The way Kylie is hated for simply existing is horrible. As a girlfriend, she has kept herself incredibly low-key. However, people will go crazy if she does the most basic thing, like accompany him to an awards show. Gross.

Goes to show the stupidity of social media and frankly most people online: ultra sensitive about some things, while gleefully slut shaming a monogamous mom of two with a discreet love life just for having fake boobs and lips.

The way he brought this on himself is really too bad. I don't think he would have won in any case, but if he had just campaigned differently, I think he would have maintained and earned even more industry goodwill. But he's probably too stupid to see that, so he got what he deserved.

Anonymous wrote:His choice of partner is problematic and indicative of a lack of taste, depth and values. So, I'm not surprised.

The way Kylie is hated for simply existing is horrible. As a girlfriend, she has kept herself incredibly low-key. However, people will go crazy if she does the most basic thing, like accompany him to an awards show. Gross.

He just said what most people are thinking.

Anonymous wrote:His choice of partner is problematic and indicative of a lack of taste, depth and values. So, I'm not surprised.

The recent "girlfriend" he was with before Jenner was also a teen mom adult entertainment performer with the huge fake tatas and Insta face. It's a choice. On the one hand, whatever maybe they are lovely people, but it does come across as very base and out of line with the persona he seems to want to project otherwise.

I like him in many of his roles. I think he’s a good actor. He’s just not a very likable person.

Anonymous wrote:His choice of partner is problematic and indicative of a lack of taste, depth and values. So, I'm not surprised.

I think that's a sexist and weird thing to say. She was born into that family and had zero choice in terms of fame, has kids, a job, and has had two long term partners including Chalamet and mostly stays out of the public eye. Most ladies on the red carpet have had as much work done if not more. Leonardo Di Caprio is a much trashier person.

Anonymous wrote:I think it was less about the comment itself and more about the overall dismissive and superior attitude i.e. "I just lost 14 cents in viewership."

And of course the understanding that what performers do in ballet and opera is only 100 million times harder and more impressive than anything he can do.

Yes, all of this. It was also a completely gratuitous comment. Had he stuck with a discussion focused on cinema — and stayed more in his own professional lane, he wouldn’t have earned such negative attention. As it is, we get to make comparisons between Chalamet with his accomplishments and ego, and multi-talented, accomplished professionals like Tom Holland.

His choice of partner is problematic and indicative of a lack of taste, depth and values. So, I'm not surprised.