Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One looks for introverts and one looks for extroverts.
Certain kids want a quintessential college experience complete with sports!
That’s right. Despite what DCUM boards will tell you, sports do A LOT for universities. Vanderbilt is a great case study in this. Awful sports for many (most) years. Finally they’ve invested in them. With that, comes more eyeballs. The school has leaned into it with better branding, uniforms, apparel, and all of the things that put eyes on their logo. Incredibly smart. Duke has had great basketball for years, and been great in some other smaller market sports, too. But, they picked it up in football the last few years and have leaned into that opportunity, too.
Anonymous wrote:What do you mean Duke ascending? I went in the 90s and it was ranked 3-5 in USNWR while I was there. I am not a huge Rah Rah Duke person but among that list, Duke was usually ranked higher. But who cares, they are all great schools. No one is going to hire a Duke v. UChicago grad just based on the name of the undergrad. All of those schools buy the same ticket.
Anonymous wrote:Duke is the gold standard of collegiate experience
Anonymous wrote:Duke is the gold standard of collegiate experience
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Couldn't be just about a protest, weather or basketball, could it? The protest was shortlived, and the weather and basketball were always there, so why they suddenly more popular now?
None of that is a valid assessment of the quality of the students.
Duke is a stable T10 no rise or decline: solidly in the T10, only one year in the last 10 has been outside of it, and has the SAT scores (pre-TO) that rival the top-4 ivies and MIT.
Columbia is in a decline: falsified data led to a fake "T3" spot, and never reported SAT scores on the CDS, due to lower than the top 4 ivies with the large pool of GS students, then they had the extensive issues with the protests and now a gated campus. It remains a top school T11-15, it could go back up to T10 (And bump down JHU with its 2 rounds of ED) but not likely in the next 5 years.
UChicago: Stable but not really a T10, though not declining fro those that understand where it really sits. Like Columbia they never reported CDS, and have been TO for a while. Furthermore they have ED1 ED2 and EA and RD, now an ED0. They game the system too much to be T10, period. They are a stable T15 That gets ranked USN T10 due to gimmicks.
Vanderbilt: used to have one of the Top-7 SAT ranges in the country, now they take tons of TO, take hundreds in sophomore transfers, all TO and many quite low (1350s). They are not ascending they are moving from what used to be T12-15 to T18-22. Their fit over the USN rankings drop was illustrative. Act like you belong, don't whine. WashU has become more prestigious as far as talent of the student body than Vanderbilt.
Anonymous wrote:I don't thinks it's an issue of prestige but rather an issue of desirability and fit. Duke and Vanderbilt tick a lot of boxes for super smart, social kids who want a fun collegiate experience with academics, sports, greek and mild weather. Unfortunately, too many top kids at our private think the same. So instead, my kid applied early to any ivy which is pretty social and had better predicted ed results vs duke/vandy. Funny enough, I went to columbia and dh went to chicago. My kid had absolutely no interest in those schools. I do think columbia's protest campus disruptions turned them off and they didn't like the restrictive core curriculum. Regarding chicago, they were turned off by the quarter system and grind reputation. Fit is equally or more important than prestige.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Couldn't be just about a protest, weather or basketball, could it? The protest was shortlived, and the weather and basketball were always there, so why they suddenly more popular now?
Chicago used to be a central hub for railroads, industrial manufacturing, and trade. The region has declined significantly.
The marketing materials we received from Chicago include comic drawings. The brand identity has changed from an academic behemoth to something else.
Who asked? And who are you to draw conclusions about an entire university based on comics and mail?