Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If these teams/schools (or clubs) contract with a brand like Adidas, for example, the brand gives them an annual merchandise credit for the length of the contract and then renegotiated again when the contract is renewed. The credit value is meaningful. Not enough to outfit a roster, but always enough for gear for HCs and ACs. This is standard.
So what happens with the thousands of dollars raised?
Aren't Boosters parents? Demand to see the books!
What’s probably happening is that the AD is authorizing the fraud mishandling of parents’ monies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If these teams/schools (or clubs) contract with a brand like Adidas, for example, the brand gives them an annual merchandise credit for the length of the contract and then renegotiated again when the contract is renewed. The credit value is meaningful. Not enough to outfit a roster, but always enough for gear for HCs and ACs. This is standard.
So what happens with the thousands of dollars raised?
Aren't Boosters parents? Demand to see the books!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If these teams/schools (or clubs) contract with a brand like Adidas, for example, the brand gives them an annual merchandise credit for the length of the contract and then renegotiated again when the contract is renewed. The credit value is meaningful. Not enough to outfit a roster, but always enough for gear for HCs and ACs. This is standard.
So what happens with the thousands of dollars raised?
Anonymous wrote:There’s a high school coach in Loudoun County who spends most of the teams own funds on custom apparel. Very little of the funds actually go toward the team. A few parents confronted the AD about it in previous seasons but nothing substantial was done about it. It’s occurring again this year with said coach appearing with all new customized apparel for this coach. Many parents help raise and contribute to these funds which are supposed to be for the team. Last year it was requested to have a full transparent accounting of the funds, but it was never provided. The coach stated at a public meeting a total BS answer about where the funds were spent and nobody did anything about it. The school just ignored the complaints but it was evident that the coach was at least partially confronted about the use or it wouldn’t have come out in the meeting. Is this a common practice in Loudoun high school sports? These teams are already poorly funded by the schools and any money raised should be transparent and used for player benefit. Wouldn’t you agree?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this DR?
Yes, with a narcissistic complex and alway caring about looks over genuine knowledge and expertise of the game and the job.
I pity the fools who have to endure his goofy ahh
The guy is the biggest tool - feel sorry for the LR players.
Anonymous wrote:If these teams/schools (or clubs) contract with a brand like Adidas, for example, the brand gives them an annual merchandise credit for the length of the contract and then renegotiated again when the contract is renewed. The credit value is meaningful. Not enough to outfit a roster, but always enough for gear for HCs and ACs. This is standard.
Anonymous wrote:No DR soccer coach anywhere.
I think this is lax.
Anonymous wrote:No DR soccer coach anywhere.
I think this is lax.
Anonymous wrote:There is no DR at Loudoun