Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congrats to PP for being an anecdotal beneficiary of waitlists…proof that it does happen. That doesn’t change the fact that for 95%+ it is indeed a soft rejection and the notion that “you’re good enough but there just aren’t enough spots” is a bit, of course, silly. Many of these h.schools will literally put 5-10X the number of admitted students and available slots on the waitlists, knowing full well that they will admit, at maximum, fewer than 5.
If a school has 20 slots and admits 30 to account for yield but puts 150 in the waiting pool, they’re just doing everyone a disservice (except, perhaps, for parents who feel better about being on an infinite waitlist rather than simply moving on).
A "Disservice"?
The system is set up and administered by the schools. It's for their benefit. They need to fill their classes and estimating the "yield" is as much an art as a science. They also want to have a range of applicants on the waitlist so they can match the needs of the school to any shortfall that the process has left them with.
This idea of a "soft" rejection is the product of message boards and others that don't understand how the whole thing works.
It is a disservice to put 100+ people on a waitlist that historically has yielded less than 5 spots in a given year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hear waitlists aren’t real- it’s a soft rejection!
Nope, they are a would have accepted, but not enough space for everyone we wanted to accepted. I have been waitlisted and gotten off the next week (as a parent), mid summer (as a kid myself), and not at all. People try to read into it, but you can't. It is luck of the one draw at a time after enough people chose to reject the school you are pinning your hopes on.
I heard maret waitlist moved
Anonymous wrote:This. And sometimes it’s more than 100, including people that the schools know full-well will never be admitted. But, they’d rather drag everyone along than deliver the direct message that the student is rejected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congrats to PP for being an anecdotal beneficiary of waitlists…proof that it does happen. That doesn’t change the fact that for 95%+ it is indeed a soft rejection and the notion that “you’re good enough but there just aren’t enough spots” is a bit, of course, silly. Many of these h.schools will literally put 5-10X the number of admitted students and available slots on the waitlists, knowing full well that they will admit, at maximum, fewer than 5.
If a school has 20 slots and admits 30 to account for yield but puts 150 in the waiting pool, they’re just doing everyone a disservice (except, perhaps, for parents who feel better about being on an infinite waitlist rather than simply moving on).
A "Disservice"?
The system is set up and administered by the schools. It's for their benefit. They need to fill their classes and estimating the "yield" is as much an art as a science. They also want to have a range of applicants on the waitlist so they can match the needs of the school to any shortfall that the process has left them with.
This idea of a "soft" rejection is the product of message boards and others that don't understand how the whole thing works.
It is a disservice to put 100+ people on a waitlist that historically has yielded less than 5 spots in a given year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congrats to PP for being an anecdotal beneficiary of waitlists…proof that it does happen. That doesn’t change the fact that for 95%+ it is indeed a soft rejection and the notion that “you’re good enough but there just aren’t enough spots” is a bit, of course, silly. Many of these h.schools will literally put 5-10X the number of admitted students and available slots on the waitlists, knowing full well that they will admit, at maximum, fewer than 5.
If a school has 20 slots and admits 30 to account for yield but puts 150 in the waiting pool, they’re just doing everyone a disservice (except, perhaps, for parents who feel better about being on an infinite waitlist rather than simply moving on).
A "Disservice"?
The system is set up and administered by the schools. It's for their benefit. They need to fill their classes and estimating the "yield" is as much an art as a science. They also want to have a range of applicants on the waitlist so they can match the needs of the school to any shortfall that the process has left them with.
This idea of a "soft" rejection is the product of message boards and others that don't understand how the whole thing works.
Anonymous wrote:Congrats to PP for being an anecdotal beneficiary of waitlists…proof that it does happen. That doesn’t change the fact that for 95%+ it is indeed a soft rejection and the notion that “you’re good enough but there just aren’t enough spots” is a bit, of course, silly. Many of these h.schools will literally put 5-10X the number of admitted students and available slots on the waitlists, knowing full well that they will admit, at maximum, fewer than 5.
If a school has 20 slots and admits 30 to account for yield but puts 150 in the waiting pool, they’re just doing everyone a disservice (except, perhaps, for parents who feel better about being on an infinite waitlist rather than simply moving on).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hear waitlists aren’t real- it’s a soft rejection!
Nope, they are a would have accepted, but not enough space for everyone we wanted to accepted. I have been waitlisted and gotten off the next week (as a parent), mid summer (as a kid myself), and not at all. People try to read into it, but you can't. It is luck of the one draw at a time after enough people chose to reject the school you are pinning your hopes on.
Anonymous wrote:I hear waitlists aren’t real- it’s a soft rejection!