Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll play. K. Happy with our current school so I only lotteried for true reaches that I'd actually leave I for: Ross and Ludlow-Taylor.
Those seem to be really odd choices. Ludlow is not worth a commute.
Anonymous wrote:5th:
Oyster
Mundo Verde Cook
Basis
Mundo Verde Calle 8
Would probably not move after the school year starts.
Anonymous wrote:OP here with a clarification: I am ONLY taking into account historical data, an average of the past five years.
Things I am NOT taking into account:
Trends
Housing prices
Changes to feeder patterns
Budgets
Projected enrollments
Modernizations
Private schools
Seats offered for this year (I am not aware of how that data is made available at this stage).
I would have to factor in DCI feeder rights if I had a person with DCI on their 6th grade list but I'd have to learn about it first![]()
If someone has comments about any of the above factors, or any other factors, for any specific lists, feel free to respond to my responses with that info and how you'd adjust the chances based on that.
Now - back to predictions!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh please. Claude could never. Has OP considered the impact of upcoming renovations and feeder pattern changes? Improvements in middle schools leading to elementary lottery interest? Different patterns for Montessori vs not? DCI feeder allocations?
Personally I would not go back 5 years. This landscape has changed a lot and it would probably be more accurate to use just the last 4 years.
OP is just trying to have some fun on a Friday and you're over here making feature requests.
But I agree, Claude could never.
Claude code does all the front end I never bothered to learn, it’s pretty good for stuff like this if you know the analyses you want to do.
Not so good at telling you which analyses to perform, I’ll say.
If you can't do it without Claude, how are you able to assess if the outputs are actually any good?
Front end is interface/UI. I test the product like I would any other, unit tests on up with deterministic outputs. For me it’s just a fancy wrapper for analyses I’d normally have in a script.
Anonymous wrote:6th
Hardy
Deal
No pref
Move is a possibility
Anonymous wrote:I'll play. K. Happy with our current school so I only lotteried for true reaches that I'd actually leave I for: Ross and Ludlow-Taylor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh please. Claude could never. Has OP considered the impact of upcoming renovations and feeder pattern changes? Improvements in middle schools leading to elementary lottery interest? Different patterns for Montessori vs not? DCI feeder allocations?
Personally I would not go back 5 years. This landscape has changed a lot and it would probably be more accurate to use just the last 4 years.
OP is just trying to have some fun on a Friday and you're over here making feature requests.
But I agree, Claude could never.
Claude code does all the front end I never bothered to learn, it’s pretty good for stuff like this if you know the analyses you want to do.
Not so good at telling you which analyses to perform, I’ll say.
If you can't do it without Claude, how are you able to assess if the outputs are actually any good?
Anonymous wrote:If the Claude-boosters want a project, how about scraping data from dcpsbudget.com? Calculate the projected enrollment increase for each school relative to last year, for each grade. Produce a table that lists only the grades expecting an increase or decrease of 5 or more students, organized by school.
Anonymous wrote:Claude could totally.