Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All that deception, just for a shot at HYP. What a waste. I am sure it works, but at what cost?
Then you go there and have to compete with kids who got in genuinely and are naturally driven. No school is worth this. Its better to use your teens being authentic and figuring out what you really love doing.
Anonymous wrote:All that deception, just for a shot at HYP. What a waste. I am sure it works, but at what cost?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My unhooked kid is at an Ivy and this just sounds so sick.
He just did the things he loved. By Fall of Senior year, you could see a pattern. His “narrative” (even hate that - blah) was easily pieced together.
We never “packaged” our kids or gunned for anything. They were naturally motivated/smart and always got As, top scores without us doing anything. Both were heavily into a sport they were not recruited for as well (did get re ruined for very low academic, tiny schools).
It might very well work, OP. But doing this and telling kids to just change once they are on campus just feels so creepy to me.
same w my two kids at HYP now. unhooked. no spike or barb developed during HS. but quantifiable results in school: elected to school positions, won major debate/MUN/mock trial events on state or national level. They both pieced together unique career interests out of what they had done/read/studied/did a summer thing related to so they would be memorable in a committee meeting: Northern Virginia kid interested in post-nuclear war/low light agriculture. also won state MUN tournament, elected president of 250-member service club, and has a 36 on the ACT.
Anonymous wrote:My unhooked kid is at an Ivy and this just sounds so sick.
He just did the things he loved. By Fall of Senior year, you could see a pattern. His “narrative” (even hate that - blah) was easily pieced together.
We never “packaged” our kids or gunned for anything. They were naturally motivated/smart and always got As, top scores without us doing anything. Both were heavily into a sport they were not recruited for as well (did get re ruined for very low academic, tiny schools).
It might very well work, OP. But doing this and telling kids to just change once they are on campus just feels so creepy to me.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I agree. My DD's barb was on a niche aspect of Chinese Opera music, and making it more accessible to teens in her community. She got into Yale REA this year!
Anonymous wrote:I think this is a rather old strategy: pretending you are interested in less competitive but niche majors to bypass the competition of popular majors. Only works if the kid is mature and smart so they are willing to play the college game following adult’s design.
\Anonymous wrote:This strategy is not hard to map out. I was able to come up with 3-4 very niche ideas for how to expand/scale my DC’s interests over the 4 years of high school into something with measurable community impact and a big spike for college applications. DC refused to play along. Not all kids are as compliant as PP says. It isn’t hard to find or create really unique, interesting ECs in the DC area, but you really need a certain type of kid that is willing to play this game. Mine was not one of them.