Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 is the UMC flex
1000% if you have the social and financial to support this is the biggest flex in the DMV.
Or…you can just live with 3 and not spend a lot of money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 is the UMC flex
1000% if you have the social and financial to support this is the biggest flex in the DMV.
Anonymous wrote:3 is the UMC flex
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:its popular with female doctors, 3rd one cost me so much of my health...
All the female docs I know have 0-1 kids. But they are in academia so maybe it’s different!
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I feel like I’m hearing more 3rd kids. And actually seeing 1 or 3 kid families instead of 2.
Anonymous wrote:Data is your friend.
In the US, the average number of children per family is less than 2, and is continuing to decline.
You're noticing the larger families more, OP et al, because your mind is used to seeing small families!
What others point out, IVF use in wealthy families, is true - but it's nowhere near enough to reverse the overall trend.
Anonymous wrote:I think having only two kids of the same gender is becoming less common. It's either boy-girl sib set or three plus, and yeah, probably because it's more acceptable now to have a baby at 40+.