Anonymous wrote:My guess: Someone internal is getting the role (internal politics) or someone with influence swooped in with a candidate. Anyway, sounds like they did like you, and it’s good practice for your next opportunity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you a woman? And a man got picked?
Op I am a woman but I obviously have no idea who got picked
My last CEO was a man and he hired lots of women in senior roles.
My current CEO is a women and hires nearly all men.
You never know
What does this have to do with the topic at hand, or even the post you’re replying to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you a woman? And a man got picked?
Op I am a woman but I obviously have no idea who got picked
My last CEO was a man and he hired lots of women in senior roles.
My current CEO is a women and hires nearly all men.
You never know
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you a woman? And a man got picked?
Op I am a woman but I obviously have no idea who got picked
Anonymous wrote:OP, I have been in your shoes more times than I can count. Don't be so hard on yourself. It's a numbers game,not something you did or didn't do. At every level, decisions are made in tangible and intangible factors. Easy to take personally.
Anonymous wrote:A PP. The times I've thought things went weird like this, it was an internal candidate.
The person who brought you in twice probably wants to hire you.
I would only look for feedback from the recruiter.
If there is ever a third interview offer, that is the correct time to ask what is different about the new round.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, OP. It's impossible to tell whether there was an actual flaw in your presentation or whether they just preferred someone else, for good or bad reasons. Usually every interview will give the impression it went well, though, because in person, no wants to be rude and social people get caught up in the emotional moment and become extra enthusiastic. So that's not a good measure of how well you did. It means you were decent... but it doesn't always mean you were the best.
The rejection was quite brusque, and I take it to mean that the person writing it knows very well what a warm reception you got during the interview, and is feeling very awkward about having to write such a missive. So they went for sharp break... which says more about them than about you!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, OP. It's impossible to tell whether there was an actual flaw in your presentation or whether they just preferred someone else, for good or bad reasons. Usually every interview will give the impression it went well, though, because in person, no wants to be rude and social people get caught up in the emotional moment and become extra enthusiastic. So that's not a good measure of how well you did. It means you were decent... but it doesn't always mean you were the best.
The rejection was quite brusque, and I take it to mean that the person writing it knows very well what a warm reception you got during the interview, and is feeling very awkward about having to write such a missive. So they went for sharp break... which says more about them than about you!
Op I do fear it was a flaw in my presentation. I was nervous and I think I spoke too quickly, so then I made a joke about too much coffee, which everyone laughed at but clearly wasn't funny. Or the hiring manager mentioned something about her husband that he has in common with my husband so then we were talking about that and I'm sure maybe she felt I was being too familiar for a job interviewer.
Anyway, thank you all for the kind words.
You know damn well for the right candidates a dorky joke or a harmless mention of personal life is not going to make them go from "Wow! We need to bring her on board!" to "Oh my god get her out of here."
Honestly they likely knew before they brought you in that it wouldn't be you and were just being polite. Which is shitty.