Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Non working options.
Diet changes 10 percent at best.
Not necessarily. I changed mine quite a bit more than that by losing weight and changing how I eat. I think for people who are obese, like I was, the results can be much greater. Either way, there is absolutely zero reason not to change how you eat even if it is only 10 percent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"I have an obese friend who is on statins and she said it isn’t high enough for med"
Your friend is wrong.
+1
Why does your friend think their cholesterol level is the bar for meds???
Over 200 is considered high.
If you have diabetes, doctors will probably want you on a statin with high cholesterol because the two conditions together exponentially increase heart risk.
more important is the LDL/HDL. Still, if this is not your typical cholesterol level, I suspect your doctor will mention meds.
I don't like statins, personally. I've had lightheadedness with two of them now; but supposedly insurance wants you to work through all the statins before they cover a non-statin option. I don't know if that's true, just what my doctor explained to me when I asked for a non-statin alternative.
What is a non-statin option? I honestly don't know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You honestly need to talk to your doc. Do not crowd source your health. You know it's bad. What do you want from us?
Yes. Even if an expert were here, there's no way to know the appropriate behavioral or medical approach without knowing more details about the test (HDL/LDL etc.), your sex, your other medical conditions, weight, current diet and exercise, family history, etc.
And even if you wanted to do some general research before talking to your doctor, you'd be better off talking to AI for background. There will be various answers here and you have no way to know which are informed and reasonable and which are just people spouting off. (I, of course, am informed and reasonable.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate the kneejerk reaction for statins.
+1 The guidance now is not automatic statins for over 200.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Mine shot up at menopause. It's now 229 and I'm fit and exercise plenty. My cardiologist said that more important than the overall number is the ratio between good and bad. My ratio is fine. Also important is that my calcium score is zero. So no statins for me yet.
Anonymous wrote:I hate the kneejerk reaction for statins.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Mine shot up at menopause. It's now 229 and I'm fit and exercise plenty. My cardiologist said that more important than the overall number is the ratio between good and bad. My ratio is fine. Also important is that my calcium score is zero. So no statins for me yet.
Anonymous wrote:That seems pretty high. I am 42 and my cholesterol is about 195 with the good cholesterol (is that HDL?) higher than the bad cholesterol.
Anonymous wrote:I am 50 and not really in great shape, and mine is 150. Yes, you need to see a Dr. next week. Do you not get annual checkups? How's your blood pressure? If you are male, I would be concerned about having a widow maker heart attack.