Anonymous wrote:
Dude was blind. They probably said "we'll drop you here" and when he got out he wouldn't have been able to see that it was closed. And he didn't speak English well enough to articulate his distress presumably.
But the ICE people presumably had their senses around them. I hope this man haunts their dreams nightly--how callous can you be to dump a blind old man at a closed coffee shop in the freezing cold.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This situation is tragic. A man died. That is sad. But what makes me angry is how quickly this turns into a narrative where questioning the system is treated as heartless.
I’m a first generation American. My parents came here with nothing. They did not come for support. They came to work, to serve, to build something, and to give back. They paid taxes. They created jobs. They respected the law. In our home, immigration meant contribution. It meant earning your place here through effort and responsibility.
That is the standard I was raised with.
Asylum is supposed to be about urgent protection from persecution. It is not supposed to be a long term entitlement program. If someone enters under humanitarian protection, later commits crimes, serves a sentence, and still remains in the country with ongoing public support and supervision, it is fair to ask whether the system is aligned with contribution and accountability.
Taxpayers are not an unlimited resource. Americans are already struggling with housing costs, healthcare, and inflation. When the immigration system appears to prioritize continued support for individuals who are not integrating, not contributing economically, and not respecting the law, public trust erodes.
This is not about politics. It is not about attacking refugees as people. It is about whether immigration policy should prioritize safety paired with responsibility and contribution. If we stop expecting contribution altogether, we fundamentally change what immigration to America has historically meant.
We can acknowledge tragedy and still say clearly: immigration must be tied to accountability, lawful behavior, and a good faith effort to contribute to the country that offers protection. Without that, the system becomes unsustainable.
One more thing that really needs to be said.
Asylum is supposed to be about immediate safety from persecution. The core idea is protection, not picking a preferred destination.
Myanmar is bordered by Bangladesh, India, Thailand, China, and Laos. Several of those countries already host refugees from Myanmar. If someone is truly fleeing urgent danger, the nearest safe country is where protection should happen. That is the basic logic of asylum.
So it is completely fair to ask: why travel halfway across the world to the United States when there are neighboring countries providing refuge?
When asylum starts looking less like emergency protection and more like selecting the country with the strongest benefits and long term support systems, people are going to question it. That is not heartless. It is rational.
The United States cannot function as the default endpoint for every crisis across the globe simply because it offers more resources. If proximity and immediate safety are no longer the standard, then asylum stops being about protection and starts being about destination choice.
Compassion matters. But policy still has to make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really not sure when we just completely lost our way.
I just don't remember us being so horrible even 10 or 15 years ago. Maybe I had rose colored glasses.
The police all seem like disgusting thugs and ICE are monsters.
It’s a very good question. Americans used to be the good guys. Hard to believe that any person could be this callous - let alone a well-resourced federal official.
There is no bottom to the Trump administration. None.
There’s a very strong argument to be made that Americans have never actually been the good guys. The idea of Americans being heroic is… not reality, and never has been. As my father in law said “if Americans were so great they never would have made black people use separate water fountains. That’s just insane.”
Look at who Americans voted for.
Twice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really not sure when we just completely lost our way.
I just don't remember us being so horrible even 10 or 15 years ago. Maybe I had rose colored glasses.
The police all seem like disgusting thugs and ICE are monsters.
It’s a very good question. Americans used to be the good guys. Hard to believe that any person could be this callous - let alone a well-resourced federal official.
There is no bottom to the Trump administration. None.
Anonymous wrote:These stories make one ask - Where is the humanity and how did the US get to this level of cruelty?
How will it find its way back to humanity, as a country?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can read about it here , there are many countries nearby that can take them in. No need for for fake refugee status to ship them all the way to the us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_people
So you’re good with murdering him?
No one murdered anyone, he was left at a place of his choosing after serving a jail sentence. Why didn't the jail call his family? D
Anonymous wrote:Very misleading he was a criminal and was released from jail on state charges after serving a sentence. Ice offered to drop him off and he chose the coffee shop . If anything ice helped him as local authorities would have released him on the street
Anonymous wrote:I think Democrats need to stop spreading misinformation. ICE is no way involved in this and if you really believe in the stuff that they are posting in Twitter than I am afraid you’re presenting a skill issue during our Golden Age. Ha ha. Stand with ICE.
Anonymous wrote:Very misleading he was a criminal and was released from jail on state charges after serving a sentence. Ice offered to drop him off and he chose the coffee shop . If anything ice helped him as local authorities would have released him on the street
Anonymous wrote:This situation is tragic. A man died. That is sad. But what makes me angry is how quickly this turns into a narrative where questioning the system is treated as heartless.
I’m a first generation American. My parents came here with nothing. They did not come for support. They came to work, to serve, to build something, and to give back. They paid taxes. They created jobs. They respected the law. In our home, immigration meant contribution. It meant earning your place here through effort and responsibility.
That is the standard I was raised with.
Asylum is supposed to be about urgent protection from persecution. It is not supposed to be a long term entitlement program. If someone enters under humanitarian protection, later commits crimes, serves a sentence, and still remains in the country with ongoing public support and supervision, it is fair to ask whether the system is aligned with contribution and accountability.
Taxpayers are not an unlimited resource. Americans are already struggling with housing costs, healthcare, and inflation. When the immigration system appears to prioritize continued support for individuals who are not integrating, not contributing economically, and not respecting the law, public trust erodes.
This is not about politics. It is not about attacking refugees as people. It is about whether immigration policy should prioritize safety paired with responsibility and contribution. If we stop expecting contribution altogether, we fundamentally change what immigration to America has historically meant.
We can acknowledge tragedy and still say clearly: immigration must be tied to accountability, lawful behavior, and a good faith effort to contribute to the country that offers protection. Without that, the system becomes unsustainable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really not sure when we just completely lost our way.
I just don't remember us being so horrible even 10 or 15 years ago. Maybe I had rose colored glasses.
The police all seem like disgusting thugs and ICE are monsters.
It’s a very good question. Americans used to be the good guys. Hard to believe that any person could be this callous - let alone a well-resourced federal official.
There is no bottom to the Trump administration. None.