Anonymous wrote:Thanks for sharing. I was a little surprised to see USC on there. I thought they were better resourced and already popular enough to pull full pay top students.
Anonymous wrote:After working in higher ed for about 15 years, including at a top private DCUM salivates over, I came to the conclusion that, if your state has a decent flagship, that is the only school you should be looking at. Taking out loans to go to a private school that doesn't get money from the government/state lottery is usually a bad idea. At a minimum, the amounts are lower and it is unclear to me whether these are in-state or out-of-state admits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Awful. The Obama Admin tried to do something about Parent Plus but were blocked by HBCU grifters. Glad to see no HBCUs on these lists though.
https://cbc.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=448
So maybe it’s not the HBCU schools that are the “grifters”.
Americans routinely take on enormous debt for medical care and education— things that many countries provide at minimal or no cost — recognizing the importance of having educated, healthy citizens.
That's because most other countries don't have a "college for all" mentality. Student aptitude is tracked early on and funneled towards trade or university accordingly (e.g. Germany) or admission is based on a single exam (e.g. East Asia).
The American college setup contains a social engineering agenda that most other countries do not flirt with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Awful. The Obama Admin tried to do something about Parent Plus but were blocked by HBCU grifters. Glad to see no HBCUs on these lists though.
https://cbc.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=448
Obama is responsible for the student loan crisis and the absurd view that everyone deserves to go to college.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for sharing. I was a little surprised to see USC on there. I thought they were better resourced and already popular enough to pull full pay top students.
Anonymous wrote:The schools on the list largely make sense. The southern schools have all seen massive tuition increases to fund their football-themed, resort level amenities. Touring Clemson and Auburn last year felt more like Disneyland than a serious university. I was surprised (and disappointed) to read about this practice at Jesuit institutions. Seems antithetical to Catholic social teaching.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Awful. The Obama Admin tried to do something about Parent Plus but were blocked by HBCU grifters. Glad to see no HBCUs on these lists though.
https://cbc.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=448
So maybe it’s not the HBCU schools that are the “grifters”.
Americans routinely take on enormous debt for medical care and education— things that many countries provide at minimal or no cost — recognizing the importance of having educated, healthy citizens.
Oh there are definitely grifters at HBCUs of a particular type, although they are certainly not the only ones. And the very modest and sensible 2013 reforms to parent plus were totally derailed specifically by the HBCUs, making it basically radioactive to talk about Parent Plus reforms for a long time.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for sharing. I was a little surprised to see USC on there. I thought they were better resourced and already popular enough to pull full pay top students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Awful. The Obama Admin tried to do something about Parent Plus but were blocked by HBCU grifters. Glad to see no HBCUs on these lists though.
https://cbc.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=448
So maybe it’s not the HBCU schools that are the “grifters”.
Americans routinely take on enormous debt for medical care and education— things that many countries provide at minimal or no cost — recognizing the importance of having educated, healthy citizens.
That's because most other countries don't have a "college for all" mentality. Student aptitude is tracked early on and funneled towards trade or university accordingly (e.g. Germany) or admission is based on a single exam (e.g. East Asia).
The American college setup contains a social engineering agenda that most other countries do not flirt with.[/quote]
_+1. Exactly. Why isn't anyone saying these parents should say no to taking on this debt? What about free agency? If I buy a cadillac that turns out to be a lemona and I can't afford it, that's my fault. Why do we here say "oh bad schools offering a way to pay for American education". Parents can just say "we can't afford it" as my parents did often.
+2 Parents have the responsibility to make financial decisions within their means. College costs are out of control, so our kids need a combination of merit and athletic scholarships. We know that we can't afford the full pay cost of attendance that the colleges claim we can pay.