Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think to get to a lot of those levels, men and women have to have a certain level of sociopathic/psychopathic behavior. There is a lot behind the scenes that's necessary to get to that level, and you don't get there by being nice and morally right to everyone.
Agree. You have to be ruthless to be a CEO of a large company, for example (in addition to other things, but ruthlessness is pretty much a requirement).
Anonymous wrote:Epstein files are painting a picture that every rich, famous and powerful man is corrupt at minimum and evil on average. In your opinion , what percentage of such men are moral and ethical? [/quote
Probably 100%. Wealth is power and power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Billionaires have absolute power until, and unless we, the hoi poilloi rebel. We are a country founded on a revolution and it's way past time that we took our country back to GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE!
Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of evil, corrupt broke men sitting in basements. They'd be on that island in a minute if they weren't so broke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:99.999%
Came here to say this...and I study these people for a living.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve known 2 men who were billionaires (met thru work/worked with them).
First one was a jerk. Was used to yelling and intimidating everyone to get his way. The first day I met him, he yelled and me and cussed me out for something I had literally nothing to do with (think, like, a bird pooped on his car). Extremely controlling of his wife. I could tell he viewed her more as a possession and beneath him.
Second one was a great, great guy. Extremely chill, kind, strong moral code, absolutely devoted to his wife. I actually felt kind of bad for him, his wife was often pretty mean to him.
Anonymous wrote:
. . .
Famous: Mostly non-evil. Most of the famous are performers or athletes. I'd actually say most of your non-evil rich people are the famous performers. Musicians, famous sports people, your big influencers. Yeah, a decent amount are evil/corrupt, but less than the above categories. Lots of them got to the top honestly. I'd say 30%?
Overall population evil/corrupt: <5%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think to get to a lot of those levels, men and women have to have a certain level of sociopathic/psychopathic behavior. There is a lot behind the scenes that's necessary to get to that level, and you don't get there by being nice and morally right to everyone.
I think this sort of thing is like an addiction. Like, they keep needing more and more (money, sex, drugs) to feel something. And at some point 1-1 relationships seem boring. So, they keep ramping it up because they have everything at their easy access. They need something more extreme to feel something and to feel special/have things others don't have. In no way excusing it, it's horrible, but I don't think these people all start off as bad people. Even look at the first wives and children of some of these folks - seem like normal, decent people. But more recent decisions seem in line with just wanting more, more, more.
Anonymous wrote:I think to get to a lot of those levels, men and women have to have a certain level of sociopathic/psychopathic behavior. There is a lot behind the scenes that's necessary to get to that level, and you don't get there by being nice and morally right to everyone.
Anonymous wrote:I think to get to a lot of those levels, men and women have to have a certain level of sociopathic/psychopathic behavior. There is a lot behind the scenes that's necessary to get to that level, and you don't get there by being nice and morally right to everyone.