Anonymous wrote:Love these people who cancel their subscription to the Post, and then want to know what they can read instead. This is like burning down the Smithsonian museums and then being like "what other museums in DC can I go to instead?"
Anonymous wrote:Washington City Paper, Washington Informer, Capitol Hill Corner, Hey DC, the 51st, WAMU, WPFW, WTOP, all the ANC listserves, etc. I've been having to cobble things together for a while since the Post's Metro coverage started it's slide years ago.
Didn't cancel before but there will not be anything I care to read. They already have a health section, which is ok. Their national and food sections are not as good as NYT. Losing the book section. They will have to create a business section out of whole cloth since they basically already did away with it. Not much left for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love these people who claim to care about politics and public policy but won't subscribe to the Post. Apparently you don't care that much!
DP. I subscribe to the WSJ, Post and NYTimes. (and Bloomberg!). If the Post doesn’t have decent local news then there is truly no reason for me to keep my subscription. The only thing I will miss is Capitol Weather Gang but I guess I will just follow Matthew Capucci’s socials.
+1 there are tons of options. Democracy won’t die in darkness. I’m not subscribing because it used to be good.
There's only a handful of news organizations in the entire world that can match the Post.
And I subscribe to every one of these. Instead of the Post. Because the WP is not the paper of yore.
The Washington Nationals are not the Washington Nationals of yore either, but still we support them.
Anonymous wrote:Love these people who claim to care about politics and public policy but won't subscribe to the Post. Apparently you don't care that much!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:51st.news has the local coverage feel that I'm looking for
The 51st is good for obsequious coverage of the DC government. If you want your local coverage to sound a bit like a press release, the 51st is for you.
The 51st is the best news outlet for people who think NPR is reactionary and also people who say "wypipo" unironically.
You live in a weird little bubble. I don't know what the first means and the second sounds kind of racist but I also don't know what you mean.
If you don't understand the first and have never met anyone who's said the second, consider the possibility that it is you who lives in a bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that all these people are canceling their subscriptions to the Post to protest Bezos, but those same people would never ever cancel their subscription to Amazon. Bezos doesn't make a dime from the Post. It's been losing money for years.
Cancel your subscription to Amazon, p*ssies. Don't take it out on the reporters who are just trying to tell you what is happening in your world.
Newspapers aren’t a charity. I subscribed to the post for local, NY times for national and international and WSJ for business. That’s already too much to consume. If you take away the reason for my subscription, I’m not going to spend my money. And given the new editorial slant of the Post, I’ll take the Nytimes over the Post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love these people who claim to care about politics and public policy but won't subscribe to the Post. Apparently you don't care that much!
DP. I subscribe to the WSJ, Post and NYTimes. (and Bloomberg!). If the Post doesn’t have decent local news then there is truly no reason for me to keep my subscription. The only thing I will miss is Capitol Weather Gang but I guess I will just follow Matthew Capucci’s socials.
+1 there are tons of options. Democracy won’t die in darkness. I’m not subscribing because it used to be good.
There's only a handful of news organizations in the entire world that can match the Post.
And I subscribe to every one of these. Instead of the Post. Because the WP is not the paper of yore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that all these people are canceling their subscriptions to the Post to protest Bezos, but those same people would never ever cancel their subscription to Amazon. Bezos doesn't make a dime from the Post. It's been losing money for years.
Cancel your subscription to Amazon, p*ssies. Don't take it out on the reporters who are just trying to tell you what is happening in your world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love these people who claim to care about politics and public policy but won't subscribe to the Post. Apparently you don't care that much!
DP. I subscribe to the WSJ, Post and NYTimes. (and Bloomberg!). If the Post doesn’t have decent local news then there is truly no reason for me to keep my subscription. The only thing I will miss is Capitol Weather Gang but I guess I will just follow Matthew Capucci’s socials.
+1 there are tons of options. Democracy won’t die in darkness. I’m not subscribing because it used to be good.
There's only a handful of news organizations in the entire world that can match the Post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love these people who cancel their subscription to the Post, and then want to know what they can read instead. This is like burning down the Smithsonian museums and then being like "what other museums in DC can I go to instead?"
Sure, if the Smithsonian was part of the nazi reich. Bezos got Trump elected. F the post. The employees lost their chance to strike or wield their power months ago. Now they’re just holding on until they find another paying gig which is hard for journalists these days.
Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that all these people are canceling their subscriptions to the Post to protest Bezos, but those same people would never ever cancel their subscription to Amazon. Bezos doesn't make a dime from the Post. It's been losing money for years.
Anonymous wrote:Love these people who cancel their subscription to the Post, and then want to know what they can read instead. This is like burning down the Smithsonian museums and then being like "what other museums in DC can I go to instead?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:51st.news has the local coverage feel that I'm looking for
The 51st is good for obsequious coverage of the DC government. If you want your local coverage to sound a bit like a press release, the 51st is for you.
The 51st is the best news outlet for people who think NPR is reactionary and also people who say "wypipo" unironically.
You live in a weird little bubble. I don't know what the first means and the second sounds kind of racist but I also don't know what you mean.