Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at it from the perspective of a full pay applicant.
Georgetown Acceptance rate: 12%
OOS UVA: 9%
It is not just Virginians who want to go to UVA.
Georgetown yield rate is 47%. UVA OOS yield rate is 24%.
This does not show IS and OOS split.
The bar is lower for UVA IS so that is a true backup for many Virginians.
UVA OOS is a harder admit.
24% is the UVA OOS yield rate. Georgetown is not a state school so there is no in-state/OOS split.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at it from the perspective of a full pay applicant.
Georgetown Acceptance rate: 12%
OOS UVA: 9%
It is not just Virginians who want to go to UVA.
Georgetown yield rate is 47%. UVA OOS yield rate is 24%.
This does not show IS and OOS split.
The bar is lower for UVA IS so that is a true backup for many Virginians.
UVA OOS is a harder admit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Instate tuition for Virginians.
This!
Honestly. People are such idiots today. They want to waste everyone’s time here instead of doing a simple google:
UVA: $40,000 a year x 4 = $160,000
Privates; $100k (yes NYU has surpassed the mark and USC is $99,400) = $400,000
$400,000 - $160,000 =$240,000.00
That’s higher if, like most parents, you haven’t saved $240k so are paying in after-tax dollars, so let’s say $300,000 savings x 3 VA kids = $1.2 million in savings.
So, if your kid can get in, bank the difference, let it compound, then pay to grad school or down pain a house.
We did this and were able to send our kid to Oxford and now Stanford Law School
Anonymous wrote:I live in DC and I see VA posters talk about these schools as if they're ivies. Why??? I understand that UVA has a certain mystique as it's VA's only "elite"-approaching school, but, frankly, UVA isn't even Georgetown, nevermind Stanford or Yale.
William and Mary is unique because of its size and also has some level of mystique but, again, I don't understand the commotion. It's essentially a public Wake Forest. Why?
Same story with VT. Even less of a reason to get into a twist because it's just like every other large public school in the nation. It has nice architecture, sure, but...so what?!
Can anyone enlighten me?
Anonymous wrote:W&M is older than several Ivys - founded in 1693, I think.
UVa says founded 1819, but I think classes did not start that year.
VT is much newer, created explicitly to be the land-grant university.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at it from the perspective of a full pay applicant.
Georgetown Acceptance rate: 12%
OOS UVA: 9%
It is not just Virginians who want to go to UVA.
Georgetown yield rate is 47%. UVA OOS yield rate is 24%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at it from the perspective of a full pay applicant.
Georgetown Acceptance rate: 12%
OOS UVA: 9%
It is not just Virginians who want to go to UVA.
Georgetown yield rate is 47%. UVA OOS yield rate is 24%.
Yes. Georgetown better in that important sense.
Here is cross admit result. Parchment is just another bit of data that you can believe or not.
UVA 55%
Georgetown 45%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at it from the perspective of a full pay applicant.
Georgetown Acceptance rate: 12%
OOS UVA: 9%
It is not just Virginians who want to go to UVA.
Georgetown yield rate is 47%. UVA OOS yield rate is 24%.
Anonymous wrote:Look at it from the perspective of a full pay applicant.
Georgetown Acceptance rate: 12%
OOS UVA: 9%
It is not just Virginians who want to go to UVA.
Anonymous wrote:New universities can and should emerge over time. UCLA was the Southern California branch of Berkeley when it was created only a little more than a hundred years ago. In the original limited USNWR ranking in the mid-1980s it was not even included. Recently, it has been at the top among public universities in the country in USNWR.