Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing personality type into the mix, she is supposed to be an ISTJ. She's trying to make logical choices. she had love affairs along the way but i think she knew better than to try to make that into something serious. It was suppose to make sense that she held out and married a doctor. She didn't bank on him being abusive and nuts. Then from that position she did what she could to make something for herself.
I’m surprised Joan didn’t figure out that the doctor was a loser…she is good at reading people generally. But then again she does make questionable romantic decisions: Roger and having his baby!
Trudy also seems savvy and clever but is married to the turd that is Pete. It does seem to imply the 60s ideal of domesticity was a false bill of goods. Most of the married women end up miserable
Indeed! It’s painful to see these beautiful and smart women married to lackluster men and trapped into the limited roles of wife and home maker. There isn’t one positive romantic relationship portrayed on the show. Well I suppose Henry is a good husband to Betty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing personality type into the mix, she is supposed to be an ISTJ. She's trying to make logical choices. she had love affairs along the way but i think she knew better than to try to make that into something serious. It was suppose to make sense that she held out and married a doctor. She didn't bank on him being abusive and nuts. Then from that position she did what she could to make something for herself.
I’m surprised Joan didn’t figure out that the doctor was a loser…she is good at reading people generally. But then again she does make questionable romantic decisions: Roger and having his baby!
Trudy also seems savvy and clever but is married to the turd that is Pete. It does seem to imply the 60s ideal of domesticity was a false bill of goods. Most of the married women end up miserable
Indeed! It’s painful to see these beautiful and smart women married to lackluster men and trapped into the limited roles of wife and home maker. There isn’t one positive romantic relationship portrayed on the show. Well I suppose Henry is a good husband to Betty.
Oh, idk if this is true. The two other lower level marriages seem okay. Cos grove and Harry? Plus don’t forget Peggy and whatshisname! I don’t know if they get married of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Deep down, she clearly wasn’t cut out to be a suburban wife with an important husband. At the end, she is fulfilled by a career, a company she co-owns with Peggy. Yes, she had a baby along the way, and found surprising joy in that—but her son isn’t her happy ending; he’s part of it.
And it turned out catching the “right” man was very, very wrong for her, and harmful to her, and she had more fun with men on her own terms. Which is kind of what her instincts were telling her all along.
At the end Peggy stays at McCann and Joan is running her own commercial production company.
…the company which she and Peggy started together with writing and development, but OK
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing personality type into the mix, she is supposed to be an ISTJ. She's trying to make logical choices. she had love affairs along the way but i think she knew better than to try to make that into something serious. It was suppose to make sense that she held out and married a doctor. She didn't bank on him being abusive and nuts. Then from that position she did what she could to make something for herself.
I’m surprised Joan didn’t figure out that the doctor was a loser…she is good at reading people generally. But then again she does make questionable romantic decisions: Roger and having his baby!
Trudy also seems savvy and clever but is married to the turd that is Pete. It does seem to imply the 60s ideal of domesticity was a false bill of goods. Most of the married women end up miserable
Indeed! It’s painful to see these beautiful and smart women married to lackluster men and trapped into the limited roles of wife and home maker. There isn’t one positive romantic relationship portrayed on the show. Well I suppose Henry is a good husband to Betty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the class commentary. It’s clear Joan is working class even though exceptionally beautiful and intelligent. Roger likes sleeping with her but never seriously offers her marriage or stability. He does marry Jane though, even though she is a secretary and Don marries Megan. Is it implied that Megan and Jane are higher social class?
I don't think you can think about class as this cleanly delineated on Mad Men. It's NY in the 1960s, not the 1860s. Class structures have already been upended a few times. There is the question of being "from money" but then there are also differences between "old money" and new money. You also have multiple self-made characters who are given a lot of respect (including Don).
Megan's family does not seem to have much money, but Megan's dad is an academic and Megan appears to be well educated. She's also bilingual. This wouldn't impress someone like Pete's mother, who is old money and would view Megan as little better than a prostitute given that she had to work for a living before "marrying up." But it does impress Don and people like Ken and Peggy, who are middle class and not well traveled.
Jane strikes me as a classic gold digger, what Joan would be if she weren't so interesting. She's not from a wealthy background and doesn't seem to have a college degree. She's a bad secretary. But she's stunning, and she (and likely her family) were betting that a year or two as a secretary in some kind of NY firm (could have been a bank, a law firm, advertising, whatever) would land her a wealthy husband. She also sets her sights high from the start -- she doesn't mess around with the more junior men in the office. She knows exactly what she's doing but she's not from a wealthy family. She's looking to move up via marriage.
This.
People are saying Joan is working class but I don't think that's true? We see her mother throughout the series and her mother seems reasonably put together and well spoken. She's not like Peggy's mother, who was definitely a working class Catholic woman of the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing personality type into the mix, she is supposed to be an ISTJ. She's trying to make logical choices. she had love affairs along the way but i think she knew better than to try to make that into something serious. It was suppose to make sense that she held out and married a doctor. She didn't bank on him being abusive and nuts. Then from that position she did what she could to make something for herself.
I’m surprised Joan didn’t figure out that the doctor was a loser…she is good at reading people generally. But then again she does make questionable romantic decisions: Roger and having his baby!
Trudy also seems savvy and clever but is married to the turd that is Pete. It does seem to imply the 60s ideal of domesticity was a false bill of goods. Most of the married women end up miserable
Indeed! It’s painful to see these beautiful and smart women married to lackluster men and trapped into the limited roles of wife and home maker. There isn’t one positive romantic relationship portrayed on the show. Well I suppose Henry is a good husband to Betty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Deep down, she clearly wasn’t cut out to be a suburban wife with an important husband. At the end, she is fulfilled by a career, a company she co-owns with Peggy. Yes, she had a baby along the way, and found surprising joy in that—but her son isn’t her happy ending; he’s part of it.
And it turned out catching the “right” man was very, very wrong for her, and harmful to her, and she had more fun with men on her own terms. Which is kind of what her instincts were telling her all along.
At the end Peggy stays at McCann and Joan is running her own commercial production company.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing personality type into the mix, she is supposed to be an ISTJ. She's trying to make logical choices. she had love affairs along the way but i think she knew better than to try to make that into something serious. It was suppose to make sense that she held out and married a doctor. She didn't bank on him being abusive and nuts. Then from that position she did what she could to make something for herself.
I’m surprised Joan didn’t figure out that the doctor was a loser…she is good at reading people generally. But then again she does make questionable romantic decisions: Roger and having his baby!
Trudy also seems savvy and clever but is married to the turd that is Pete. It does seem to imply the 60s ideal of domesticity was a false bill of goods. Most of the married women end up miserable
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bringing personality type into the mix, she is supposed to be an ISTJ. She's trying to make logical choices. she had love affairs along the way but i think she knew better than to try to make that into something serious. It was suppose to make sense that she held out and married a doctor. She didn't bank on him being abusive and nuts. Then from that position she did what she could to make something for herself.
I’m surprised Joan didn’t figure out that the doctor was a loser…she is good at reading people generally. But then again she does make questionable romantic decisions: Roger and having his baby!
Anonymous wrote:Bringing personality type into the mix, she is supposed to be an ISTJ. She's trying to make logical choices. she had love affairs along the way but i think she knew better than to try to make that into something serious. It was suppose to make sense that she held out and married a doctor. She didn't bank on him being abusive and nuts. Then from that position she did what she could to make something for herself.
Jane is not a winner in this story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the class commentary. It’s clear Joan is working class even though exceptionally beautiful and intelligent. Roger likes sleeping with her but never seriously offers her marriage or stability. He does marry Jane though, even though she is a secretary and Don marries Megan. Is it implied that Megan and Jane are higher social class?
I don't think you can think about class as this cleanly delineated on Mad Men. It's NY in the 1960s, not the 1860s. Class structures have already been upended a few times. There is the question of being "from money" but then there are also differences between "old money" and new money. You also have multiple self-made characters who are given a lot of respect (including Don).
Megan's family does not seem to have much money, but Megan's dad is an academic and Megan appears to be well educated. She's also bilingual. This wouldn't impress someone like Pete's mother, who is old money and would view Megan as little better than a prostitute given that she had to work for a living before "marrying up." But it does impress Don and people like Ken and Peggy, who are middle class and not well traveled.
Jane strikes me as a classic gold digger, what Joan would be if she weren't so interesting. She's not from a wealthy background and doesn't seem to have a college degree. She's a bad secretary. But she's stunning, and she (and likely her family) were betting that a year or two as a secretary in some kind of NY firm (could have been a bank, a law firm, advertising, whatever) would land her a wealthy husband. She also sets her sights high from the start -- she doesn't mess around with the more junior men in the office. She knows exactly what she's doing but she's not from a wealthy family. She's looking to move up via marriage.
I also rewatched Mad Men recently and for some reason I thought Jane was a recent college grad.
You are correct, pp needs to rewatch.