Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

I think we already have that rep. MCPS is always in the news for one scandal or another.

Let’s not pretend that the only problem is system itself. Parent attitudes are off-putting as well.

It must be so hard dealing with parents who don't want sexual predators around their kids s/

I don’t think those people are the problem at all. I’m a survivor of CSA. It wasn’t school-related, but I support whatever background checks are rolled out

(Or I should say, I don’t people who really are concerned about predators are a problem. The religious bigots who think having a picture book about a gay uncle’s wedding or a trans kid is p0rn are a problem.)

The problem parents are wasting time and taxpayer money distracting the BOE with other stuff. The people who want to destroy magnets because their kid didn’t get in, for example.

As far as I can tell Thomas Taylor is the main person driving the push to destroy the magnets. Who else is pushing for this? I don't know any parents that want this.

Yep.

Is the PP claiming parents are pushing for the free regional model and that is the source of all MCPS's problems going to explain why they are blatantly making sh&t up?

Trying to shift blame to others is Thomas Taylor's calling card and I would not be remotely surprised if that maga ahole is spending his day posting here instead of trying to get schools open.

He's in the studio, currently filming his latest thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

We've had a revolving door of superintendents since Jerry Weast. Lack of interested candidates has made the search very tough and that will only continue.

Because what capable person in their right right mind would want the job?

It pays very well. Always a draw.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

I think we already have that rep. MCPS is always in the news for one scandal or another.

Let’s not pretend that the only problem is system itself. Parent attitudes are off-putting as well.

It must be so hard dealing with parents who don't want sexual predators around their kids s/

I don’t think those people are the problem at all. I’m a survivor of CSA. It wasn’t school-related, but I support whatever background checks are rolled out

(Or I should say, I don’t people who really are concerned about predators are a problem. The religious bigots who think having a picture book about a gay uncle’s wedding or a trans kid is p0rn are a problem.)

The problem parents are wasting time and taxpayer money distracting the BOE with other stuff. The people who want to destroy magnets because their kid didn’t get in, for example.

As far as I can tell Thomas Taylor is the main person driving the push to destroy the magnets. Who else is pushing for this? I don't know any parents that want this.

Monique Felder did too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

I think we already have that rep. MCPS is always in the news for one scandal or another.

Let’s not pretend that the only problem is system itself. Parent attitudes are off-putting as well.

It must be so hard dealing with parents who don't want sexual predators around their kids s/

I don’t think those people are the problem at all. I’m a survivor of CSA. It wasn’t school-related, but I support whatever background checks are rolled out

(Or I should say, I don’t people who really are concerned about predators are a problem. The religious bigots who think having a picture book about a gay uncle’s wedding or a trans kid is p0rn are a problem.)

The problem parents are wasting time and taxpayer money distracting the BOE with other stuff. The people who want to destroy magnets because their kid didn’t get in, for example.

As far as I can tell Thomas Taylor is the main person driving the push to destroy the magnets. Who else is pushing for this? I don't know any parents that want this.

Then you are very lucky.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

I think we already have that rep. MCPS is always in the news for one scandal or another.

Let’s not pretend that the only problem is system itself. Parent attitudes are off-putting as well.

It must be so hard dealing with parents who don't want sexual predators around their kids s/

I don’t think those people are the problem at all. I’m a survivor of CSA. It wasn’t school-related, but I support whatever background checks are rolled out

(Or I should say, I don’t people who really are concerned about predators are a problem. The religious bigots who think having a picture book about a gay uncle’s wedding or a trans kid is p0rn are a problem.)

The problem parents are wasting time and taxpayer money distracting the BOE with other stuff. The people who want to destroy magnets because their kid didn’t get in, for example.

As far as I can tell Thomas Taylor is the main person driving the push to destroy the magnets. Who else is pushing for this? I don't know any parents that want this.

Yep.

Is the PP claiming parents are pushing for the free regional model and that is the source of all MCPS's problems going to explain why they are blatantly making sh&t up?

Trying to shift blame to others is Thomas Taylor's calling card and I would not be remotely surprised if that maga ahole is spending his day posting here instead of trying to get schools open.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why no one wants the job.

banana republic

Sounds about right.

Grossly over entitled elite that real elites in a functional society don’t see as their equals.

An unstable middle class that is aware the current system doesn’t meet the needs of people like them, but still hope they were be the exception and be upwardly mobile.

A large underclass that is ignored unless they dare ask for change.

🎯 Nailed it!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

I think we already have that rep. MCPS is always in the news for one scandal or another.

Let’s not pretend that the only problem is system itself. Parent attitudes are off-putting as well.

It must be so hard dealing with parents who don't want sexual predators around their kids s/

I don’t think those people are the problem at all. I’m a survivor of CSA. It wasn’t school-related, but I support whatever background checks are rolled out

(Or I should say, I don’t people who really are concerned about predators are a problem. The religious bigots who think having a picture book about a gay uncle’s wedding or a trans kid is p0rn are a problem.)

The problem parents are wasting time and taxpayer money distracting the BOE with other stuff. The people who want to destroy magnets because their kid didn’t get in, for example.

As far as I can tell Thomas Taylor is the main person driving the push to destroy the magnets. Who else is pushing for this? I don't know any parents that want this.

Yep.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

I think we already have that rep. MCPS is always in the news for one scandal or another.

Let’s not pretend that the only problem is system itself. Parent attitudes are off-putting as well.

It must be so hard dealing with parents who don't want sexual predators around their kids s/

I don’t think those people are the problem at all. I’m a survivor of CSA. It wasn’t school-related, but I support whatever background checks are rolled out

(Or I should say, I don’t people who really are concerned about predators are a problem. The religious bigots who think having a picture book about a gay uncle’s wedding or a trans kid is p0rn are a problem.)

The problem parents are wasting time and taxpayer money distracting the BOE with other stuff. The people who want to destroy magnets because their kid didn’t get in, for example.

As far as I can tell Thomas Taylor is the main person driving the push to destroy the magnets. Who else is pushing for this? I don't know any parents that want this.

He's not going anywhere.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

I think we already have that rep. MCPS is always in the news for one scandal or another.

Let’s not pretend that the only problem is system itself. Parent attitudes are off-putting as well.

It must be so hard dealing with parents who don't want sexual predators around their kids s/

I don’t think those people are the problem at all. I’m a survivor of CSA. It wasn’t school-related, but I support whatever background checks are rolled out

(Or I should say, I don’t people who really are concerned about predators are a problem. The religious bigots who think having a picture book about a gay uncle’s wedding or a trans kid is p0rn are a problem.)

The problem parents are wasting time and taxpayer money distracting the BOE with other stuff. The people who want to destroy magnets because their kid didn’t get in, for example.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

We've had a revolving door of superintendents since Jerry Weast. Lack of interested candidates has made the search very tough and that will only continue.

Because what capable person in their right right mind would want the job?

+1

Not worth the stress and inevitable bad press.

This ship can’t be turned. It’s like an aircraft carrier manned by insane people who want to enter the shark infested waters.

A board member? Anyone capable?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

We've had a revolving door of superintendents since Jerry Weast. Lack of interested candidates has made the search very tough and that will only continue.

Because what capable person in their right right mind would want the job?

Hmm....who enjoying making videos was hired. What's next?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thomas Taylor is not going anywhere. He's a white man and has the protection and adoration of the all-female school board.

He'll be gone by September 2027, when his brilliant regional program goes into effect, and the school transportation system collapses immediately.

Hopefully whatever board is assembled post election will plan out a timeline to get rid of him, with a sufficient planning time so that we can attract quality candidates and not have to hire on such a short timeline again.

They never had to hire on a short timeline. That was a choice.

They can find a temporary internal hire who will be the Fall Guy or fall gal

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

We've had a revolving door of superintendents since Jerry Weast. Lack of interested candidates has made the search very tough and that will only continue.

Because what capable person in their right right mind would want the job?