Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC Got in! Map M- 289 fall and Map R- 245
Got into what program(s)?
It’s sad how Blair focuses exclusively on MAP M. My kid had a 270 MAP M and 262 MAP R and didn’t get in to Blair SMCS despite being a more well-rounded student presumably than the kid above…
It's a very narrow set of criteria. No COGAT, and with most kids who apply for Blair SMCS getting As in STEM class, MAP M is the only thing they review that shows a big range. They don't look at MAP-R at all for the STEM programs. Similarly, they don't look at MAP-M at all for the IB programs.
It's a flawed set of criteria IMHO, but I don't work for MCPS>
My kid had a 269 MAP-M with all As and I figured they had no chance of getting into SMCS, and it turns out I was correct. Unfortunately, the cut-off is pretty high.
Also, just a reminder that in addition to MAP scores and grades, there's also the essay and list of activities/interests, along with consideration of special programs (e.g., IEP, 504, etc.). While I don't know how much weight is placed on those, they do allow for some differentiation beyond just MAP-M.
But with the activities and interests you run into biases and inequities. My kids' relatively wealthy middle school has a math team, but no science team/science bowl. I'm sure other schools have far less. How can you credit a kid for showing "exceptional extracurricular interest in science" when their school offers nothing. So you end up with 100 kids selected for SMCS who have high MAP-M scores. You can prep by enrolling your kid in a MAP course, as many parents do (I never did, but my kid didn't make MAP-M 280, so I guess that was a mistake.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC Got in! Map M- 289 fall and Map R- 245
Got into what program(s)?
It’s sad how Blair focuses exclusively on MAP M. My kid had a 270 MAP M and 262 MAP R and didn’t get in to Blair SMCS despite being a more well-rounded student presumably than the kid above…
It's a very narrow set of criteria. No COGAT, and with most kids who apply for Blair SMCS getting As in STEM class, MAP M is the only thing they review that shows a big range. They don't look at MAP-R at all for the STEM programs. Similarly, they don't look at MAP-M at all for the IB programs.
It's a flawed set of criteria IMHO, but I don't work for MCPS>
My kid had a 269 MAP-M with all As and I figured they had no chance of getting into SMCS, and it turns out I was correct. Unfortunately, the cut-off is pretty high.
Also, just a reminder that in addition to MAP scores and grades, there's also the essay and list of activities/interests, along with consideration of special programs (e.g., IEP, 504, etc.). While I don't know how much weight is placed on those, they do allow for some differentiation beyond just MAP-M.
But with the activities and interests you run into biases and inequities. My kids' relatively wealthy middle school has a math team, but no science team/science bowl. I'm sure other schools have far less. How can you credit a kid for showing "exceptional extracurricular interest in science" when their school offers nothing. So you end up with 100 kids selected for SMCS who have high MAP-M scores. You can prep by enrolling your kid in a MAP course, as many parents do (I never did, but my kid didn't make MAP-M 280, so I guess that was a mistake.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC Got in! Map M- 289 fall and Map R- 245
Got into what program(s)?
It’s sad how Blair focuses exclusively on MAP M. My kid had a 270 MAP M and 262 MAP R and didn’t get in to Blair SMCS despite being a more well-rounded student presumably than the kid above…
It's a very narrow set of criteria. No COGAT, and with most kids who apply for Blair SMCS getting As in STEM class, MAP M is the only thing they review that shows a big range. They don't look at MAP-R at all for the STEM programs. Similarly, they don't look at MAP-M at all for the IB programs.
It's a flawed set of criteria IMHO, but I don't work for MCPS>
My kid had a 269 MAP-M with all As and I figured they had no chance of getting into SMCS, and it turns out I was correct. Unfortunately, the cut-off is pretty high.
Also, just a reminder that in addition to MAP scores and grades, there's also the essay and list of activities/interests, along with consideration of special programs (e.g., IEP, 504, etc.). While I don't know how much weight is placed on those, they do allow for some differentiation beyond just MAP-M.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC Got in! Map M- 289 fall and Map R- 245
Got into what program(s)?
It’s sad how Blair focuses exclusively on MAP M. My kid had a 270 MAP M and 262 MAP R and didn’t get in to Blair SMCS despite being a more well-rounded student presumably than the kid above…
It's a very narrow set of criteria. No COGAT, and with most kids who apply for Blair SMCS getting As in STEM class, MAP M is the only thing they review that shows a big range. They don't look at MAP-R at all for the STEM programs. Similarly, they don't look at MAP-M at all for the IB programs.
It's a flawed set of criteria IMHO, but I don't work for MCPS>
My kid had a 269 MAP-M with all As and I figured they had no chance of getting into SMCS, and it turns out I was correct. Unfortunately, the cut-off is pretty high.
Also, just a reminder that in addition to MAP scores and grades, there's also the essay and list of activities/interests, along with consideration of special programs (e.g., IEP, 504, etc.). While I don't know how much weight is placed on those, they do allow for some differentiation beyond just MAP-M.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC Got in! Map M- 289 fall and Map R- 245
Got into what program(s)?
It’s sad how Blair focuses exclusively on MAP M. My kid had a 270 MAP M and 262 MAP R and didn’t get in to Blair SMCS despite being a more well-rounded student presumably than the kid above…
It's a very narrow set of criteria. No COGAT, and with most kids who apply for Blair SMCS getting As in STEM class, MAP M is the only thing they review that shows a big range. They don't look at MAP-R at all for the STEM programs. Similarly, they don't look at MAP-M at all for the IB programs.
It's a flawed set of criteria IMHO, but I don't work for MCPS>
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC Got in! Map M- 289 fall and Map R- 245
Got into what program(s)?
It’s sad how Blair focuses exclusively on MAP M. My kid had a 270 MAP M and 262 MAP R and didn’t get in to Blair SMCS despite being a more well-rounded student presumably than the kid above…