Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're single, North Face.
I've found the guys who were dorks in high school/college but grew up to be successful and hot LOVE women in North Face. It reminds them of all the girls that rejected them in school, back when we all wore North Face jackets, Lululemon leggings, and UGGs.
Seek help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're single, North Face.
I've found the guys who were dorks in high school/college but grew up to be successful and hot LOVE women in North Face. It reminds them of all the girls that rejected them in school, back when we all wore North Face jackets, Lululemon leggings, and UGGs.
Seek help.
Anonymous wrote:I miss the LL Bean store that was at the Tyson's mall. The one at Pike and Rose is so small and doesn't have much for outdoor equipment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Patagonia sizing is a joke. I'm 5 ft 9, 165 pounds, athletic trim build, mens dress shirts 16/32. A medium is skin tight on me.
Size up?
IMO Patagonia is like any other brand in that fit differs from item to item and year to year. Tops used to run short and wide and now lean toward longer and trimmer torso. They actually fit me now, but I wear a size larger there than other places for shoulder and arm comfort. DH is 5’11” and 160 with short torso, long legs. He can no longer wear their base layers; they are just too long.
Anonymous wrote:Who has the better snow apparel? Boots, bibs, gloves. Etc.?
Anonymous wrote:If you're single, North Face.
I've found the guys who were dorks in high school/college but grew up to be successful and hot LOVE women in North Face. It reminds them of all the girls that rejected them in school, back when we all wore North Face jackets, Lululemon leggings, and UGGs.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like Patagonia.
This is the answer. Direct from the source or vintage.
Anonymous wrote:Patagonia sizing is a joke. I'm 5 ft 9, 165 pounds, athletic trim build, mens dress shirts 16/32. A medium is skin tight on me.