Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 19:55     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
I got a sick and horrible feeling when I read this news.

You can't buy a heart or a liver, you shouldn't be able to pay a woman to gestate a baby.

Everyone should be very worried about this "trend"
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 19:54     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:Mikey Moon? What kind of horrid name is that?


Pretty bad
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 19:53     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:Mikey Moon? What kind of horrid name is that?


Pretty bad
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 19:41     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Why hasn't she fixed that awful nose of hers?
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 17:30     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who the F cares? She never pretended or denied that she used a surrogate. She said it was a decision made with her doctor. People are so weird.


NP. Commercial surrogacy should be disallowed, like nearly all other civilized nations have done. We stand alone in the world in permitting this atrocity.


Agree with this. Altruistic surrogacy is one thing but rent-a-womb is entirely another.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 17:23     Subject: Re:Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never understood why the people who claim we are basically living in A Handmaid’s Tale are okay with this. Children are a gift; we don’t have a right to have children by any means necessary. And I say that as a person who suffered tremendously due to infertility and who doesn’t have the sort of family I always imagined I’d have. Surrogacy is using women for their bodies and is totally gross.


You think commercial surrogacy is similar to the slavery that was portrayed in The Handmaids Tale?


I’m not the PP you are responding to, but I think commercial surrogacy is similar to what is portrayed in the Handmaid’s Tale. I cannot believe it is permitted. It’s ethically and morally deeply wrong.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 17:21     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:surrogacy is exploitive. i think the minimum payment should be a million dollars or a house.

Oh please, these women know what they're signing up for.


It is like sex work. It can be done ethically and with full knowledge / consent and not an exploitation of power and priviledge but most often that isn't the case.


It can never be done ethically because the baby cannot consent to the harms done to them.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 17:20     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:Who the F cares? She never pretended or denied that she used a surrogate. She said it was a decision made with her doctor. People are so weird.


NP. Commercial surrogacy should be disallowed, like nearly all other civilized nations have done. We stand alone in the world in permitting this atrocity.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 17:16     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:Mikey Moon? What kind of horrid name is that?


Awful!!!!
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 16:08     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Or, maybe she couldn't carry a child. Are we all phony if we have kids we didn't give birth to?

She has two she had when she was fat. She literally just wants to stay skinny.


+1 she would have had to get off ozempic.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 15:45     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:surrogacy is exploitive. i think the minimum payment should be a million dollars or a house.

Oh please, these women know what they're signing up for.


It is like sex work. It can be done ethically and with full knowledge / consent and not an exploitation of power and priviledge but most often that isn't the case.


You have got to be delusional if you don’t think it is an exploitation of power and privilege.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 15:19     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:surrogacy is exploitive. i think the minimum payment should be a million dollars or a house.

Oh please, these women know what they're signing up for.


It is like sex work. It can be done ethically and with full knowledge / consent and not an exploitation of power and priviledge but most often that isn't the case.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 14:51     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:surrogacy is exploitive. i think the minimum payment should be a million dollars or a house.

Oh please, these women know what they're signing up for.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 14:50     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Anonymous wrote:Or, maybe she couldn't carry a child. Are we all phony if we have kids we didn't give birth to?

She has two she had when she was fat. She literally just wants to stay skinny.
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2026 14:37     Subject: Meghan Trainor welcome third baby via surrogate
Mikey Moon? What kind of horrid name is that?